Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 474, 2024 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355451

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge on hearing aid use and benefit is important to ensure appropriate and effective treatment. We aimed to assess prevalence and predictors of hearing aid use and benefit in Norway, as well as possible birth cohort changes. METHODS: We analyzed two large cross-sectional, population-based hearing surveys of 63,182 adults in 1996-1998 and 2017-2019 (the HUNT study). We used multivariable regression models to examine independent predictors of hearing aid use and benefit, including demography, hearing-related variables, known risk factors for hearing loss and birth cohort. RESULTS: The nationally weighted hearing aid use in the adult population increased from 4.2% in 1997 to 5.8% in 2018. The use among individuals with disabling hearing loss (≥ 35 dB HL) increased from 46.3% to 64.4%. Most users reported some (47%) or great (48%) help from their hearing aids. In addition to the level of hearing loss and birth cohort, factors associated with hearing aid use included lower age, tinnitus, childhood-onset hearing loss, higher education, marriage, having children, being exposed to occupational noise or impulse noise, recurrent ear infections, and head injury. In addition to the level of hearing loss, factors related to hearing aid benefit included younger age, female gender, and higher income. Being bothered by tinnitus reduced the benefit. CONCLUSION: Our study shows an increase in self-reported hearing aid usage over time in Norway, with lower adoption rates and perceived benefits observed among the elderly. The results suggest that having a spouse and children positively influences the adoption of hearing aids. These findings emphasize the necessity of customized strategies to address demographic disparities and the need for innovative enhancements in hearing rehabilitation programs.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva , Acúfeno , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Autoinforme , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva/terapia
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(1): 10-17, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37830428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that noise exposure can accelerate hearing decline after the noise exposure has ceased. We aimed to assess long-term hearing decline in persons with and without prior occupational noise exposure. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal study in Norway using the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) from 1996 to 1998 (baseline) and from 2017 to 2019 (follow-up). The sample included 1648 participants with baseline age ≥55 years (42% men, mean age 60 years) and <5 years occupational noise exposure after baseline. We analyzed the association between occupational noise exposure before baseline and mean hearing decline between 1998 and 2018 (20-year decline) at each frequency, adjusted for age, sex, education, and impulse noise exposure before baseline. RESULTS: Occupational noise exposure before baseline (N = 603) was associated with baseline hearing loss, but not with later accelerated 20-year decline, at any frequency. Noise-exposed persons had less subsequent 20-year decline at 3 kHz than did nonexposed. Restricting the noise-exposed group to persons who also had a baseline Coles notch (hearing thresholds at 3, 4, or 6 kHz of 10 dB or more compared with thresholds at 1 or 2 kHz and 6 or 8 kHz; N = 211), the exposed group showed less 20-year decline at both 3 and 4 kHz, as well as less accelerated 20-year decline at 8 kHz, compared with the nonexposed. CONCLUSION: Our large long-term longitudinal study shows no increased risk of continuing hearing decline after occupational noise exposure has ceased. The finding supports a conclusion that ear damage stops when the noise exposure is ended.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Audición , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología
3.
Int J Audiol ; : 1-8, 2023 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210627

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between occupational noise exposure and tinnitus. Further, to assess whether the association depends on hearing status. DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, tinnitus (>1 h daily) was regressed on job exposure matrix (JEM)-based or self-reported occupational noise exposure, adjusted for confounders. STUDY SAMPLE: The 14,945 participants (42% men, 20-59 years) attended a population-based study in Norway (HUNT4, 2017-2019). RESULTS: JEM-based noise exposure, assessed as equivalent continuous sound level normalised to 8-h working days (LEX 8 h), over the working career or as minimum 5 years ≥85 dB) was not associated with tinnitus. Years of exposure ≥80 dB (minimum one) was not associated with tinnitus. Self-reported high noise exposure (>15 h weekly ≥5 years) was associated with tinnitus overall and among persons with elevated hearing thresholds (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.3, 1.0-1.7), however not statistically significantly among persons with normal thresholds (PR 1.1, 0.8-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our large study showed no association between JEM-based noise exposure and tinnitus. This may to some extent reflect successful use of hearing protection. High self-reported noise exposure was associated with tinnitus, but not among normal hearing persons. This supports that noise-induced tinnitus to a large extent depends on audiometric hearing loss.

4.
Respir Med ; 212: 107221, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37023869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and long-term hearing decline. A further aim was to study sex differences. METHODS: Population-based cohort study in Norway (the HUNT study) with baseline measurements in 1996-1998 and follow-up in 2017-2019. The sample included 12,082 participants (43% men, mean age at follow-up 64 years). We used multiple linear regression to assess the association between COPD (minimum one registered ICD-10 code with emphysema or other COPDs during follow-up) and 20-year hearing decline in the low/mid/high frequency area (0.25-0.5/1-2/3-8 kHz). We adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking, noise exposure, ear infections, hypertension and diabetes. RESULTS: Persons registered with COPD (N = 403) had larger 20-year hearing decline at low frequencies (1.5 dB, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-2.3) and mid frequencies (1.2 dB, 95% CI 0.4-2.1), but not at high frequencies. At high frequencies, the association was stronger and statistically significant only among women (1.9 dB, 95% CI 0.6-3.2). Persons registered with both COPD and respiratory failure (N = 19) had larger 20-year hearing decline at low and mid frequencies: 7.4 dB (95% CI 3.6-11.2) and 4.5 dB (95% CI 0.7-8.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our large cohort study shows an association between COPD and increased long-term hearing decline. Women seem to be more susceptible to COPD-related hearing loss at high frequencies. The findings support that COPD can affect the cochlear function.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Audición , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología
5.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 14(1): 165-172, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396826

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between increased hearing loss and reduced physical performance in older people. METHODS: Cross-sectional population-based study using data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Survey (HUNT4) in Norway. Data were obtained from the subproject HUNT4 Hearing which collected audiometric data of people > 70 years (N = 13,197). Analyses were performed on all participants who had completed audiometry and measured balance using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), which was scored from 0 (worst score) to 12. The hearing threshold was expressed as a pure tone average (PTA). Associations between the hearing threshold for the best and worst ear and physical performance were analyzed by linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Hearing threshold was indicated with steps of 10 dB. RESULTS: Of 13,197 eligible participants, 4101 who completed audiometry and SPPB (52.3% women. mean age 76.3 years) were included. The analyses revealed an association between reduced SPPB and increased hearing threshold in the best ear (b = - 0.296; 95% CI - 0.343 to - 0. 249; P < 0.001) and the worst ear (b = - 0.229; 95% CI - 0.270 to - 0.189; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population study, we found that the increased hearing threshold was associated to reduced physical performance as measured by SPPB. The association seemed to be strongest for the best ear. The association between hearing threshold and physical performance illustrates the importance of assessing physical performance in people with hearing loss to prevent the risk of falls and disability. The underlying causes of the associations between hearing loss and poorer physical performance are not fully understood and should be further investigated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Audición
6.
Int J Audiol ; 62(4): 312-319, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of hearing loss (HL) among employed persons, the association between HL and non-employment, assessing whether this has changed over the last two decades. To identify susceptible groups for HL-related work problems and examine the association between HL and co-worker relations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of working-age participants (20-66 years). HL was defined as the pure-tone average threshold of 0.5-4 kHz in the better hearing ear: 20-34 dB (mild) or ≥35 dB (disabling). Associations were assessed with logistic regression. STUDY SAMPLE: Data from two waves of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT): HUNT2 1996-1998 (N = 38,603), HUNT4 2017-2019 (N = 19,614). RESULTS: The nationally weighted prevalence of HL among employees was 5.8%. HL was associated with non-employment, more strongly in HUNT2 (odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-2.4) than HUNT4 (OR 1.9, CI 1.7-2.1). HL was not associated with poorer co-worker relations. The association between HL and non-optimal work performance was stronger among white-collar workers than blue-collar workers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that HL is common in the employed population. It also indicates a weakened association between HL and non-employment in recent generations. White-collar workers appear to be more vulnerable to HL-related work problems than blue-collar workers.


This paper evaluates employment and work performance among hearing impaired. We show a prevalence of hearing loss (HL) among employed persons of 5.8% and that HL is associated with higher odds of non-employment. Our study indicates that the association between HL and non-employment has weakened in recent generations.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Audición , Audiometría de Tonos Puros
7.
Int J Audiol ; 62(4): 350-356, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341437

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The risk of noise injury from recreational firearm use is well known. Despite preventive measures it is uncertain whether it has become less harmful. We assessed whether the association between recreational firearm use and hearing has changed during the last two decades. DESIGN: We used a repeated cross-sectional design and determined hearing thresholds by pure-tone audiometry. Frequency-specific associations between recreational firearm use and hearing thresholds were assessed by multivariate linear regression stratified by sex and adjusted for age and other covariates. STUDY SAMPLE: Two cross-sectional population-based cohorts 20 years apart (1998 and 2018) comprised 27,580 (53% women, mean age 53 years) and 26,606 individuals (56% women, mean age 54 years), respectively. RESULTS: Recreational firearm use was reported by 28% in 1998 and 30% in 2018. The proportion that reported wearing hearing protection increased. Exposure to recreational firearms was associated with elevated thresholds at 3-6 kHz in both cohorts. The association increased with the number of lifetime shots. The associations increased by age and were substantially smaller in the most recent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of two cohorts revealed a reduction in the association between recreational firearm use and hearing over 20 years, coinciding with the introduction of hearing preservation measures.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Armas de Fuego , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Ruido , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Umbral Auditivo
8.
Front Neurosci ; 17: 1327759, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38260012

RESUMEN

Purpose: To evaluate the associations between hearing status and hearing aid use and performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults in a cross-sectional study in Norway. Methods: This study utilized data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4, 2017-2019). Hearing thresholds at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (or PTA4) in the better hearing ear were used to determine participants' hearing status [normal hearing (PTA4 hearing threshold, ≤ 15 dB), or slight (PTA4, 16-25 dB), mild (PTA4, 26-40 dB), moderate (PTA4, 41-55 dB), or severe (PTA4, ≥ 56 dB) hearing loss]. Both standard scoring and alternate MoCA scoring for people with hearing loss (deleting MoCA items that rely on auditory function) were used in data analysis. The analysis was adjusted for the confounders age, sex, education, and health covariates. Results: The pattern of results for the alternate scoring was similar to that for standard scoring. Compared with the normal-hearing group, only individuals with moderate or severe hearing loss performed worse in the MoCA. In addition, people with slight hearing loss performed better in the MoCA than those with moderate or severe hearing loss. Within the hearing loss group, hearing aid use was associated with better performance in the MoCA. No interaction was observed between hearing aid use and participants' hearing status with performance on the MoCA test. Conclusion: While hearing loss was associated with poorer performance in the MoCA, hearing aid use was found to be associated with better performance in the MoCA. Future randomized control trials are needed to further examine the efficacy of hearing aid use on the MoCA performance. When compared with standard scoring, the alternate MoCA scoring had no effect on the pattern of results.

9.
Int J Audiol ; : 1-9, 2022 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between occupational noise exposure and long-term hearing decline. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study used linear regression to investigate the association between occupational noise exposure and 20-year hearing decline, adjusted for important confounders. STUDY SAMPLE: The Norwegian cohort (N = 4,448) participated in two population-based health studies with pure-tone audiometry; HUNT2 1996-1998 and HUNT4 2017-2019. Exposure assessments included a quantitative job exposure matrix (JEM) and questionnaires. RESULTS: The participants (40.2% men, 20-39 years at baseline) had a mean 20-year decline (3-6 kHz) of 11.3 ± 9.8 decibels (dB). There was a positive association between 20-year logarithmic average noise level (JEM-based, LEX,20y) and 20-year hearing decline among men. Compared with no exposure ≥80 dB during follow-up, minimum 5 years of exposure ≥85 dB (JEM-based) predicted 2.6 dB (95% CI: 0.2-5.0) larger 20-year decline for workers aged 30-39 years at baseline, and -0.2 dB (95% CI: -2.2 to 1.7) for workers aged 20-29 years. Combining JEM information with self-reported noise exposure data resulted in stronger associations. CONCLUSION: This large longitudinal study shows an association between JEM-based noise exposure level and increased 20-year hearing decline among men. Contrary to expectations, the associations were weaker among younger workers, which might reflect a latency period.

10.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 1340, 2022 07 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the association between hearing loss and sick leave or disability pension is to a great extent based on few cross-sectional studies and remains unclear. We aim to assess the associations in a long-term follow-up population study. METHODS: We used baseline data from a large population-based hearing study in Norway, the HUNT Hearing study (1996-1998). The sample included 21 754 adults (48.5% men, mean age at baseline 36.6 years). We used register data on sick leave and disability pension (1996-2011). Cox regression was used to assess the association between hearing loss at baseline (Pure tone average/PTA 0.5-4 kHz > 20 dB) and time to first physician-certified sick leave episode, as well as time to first disability pension payment. RESULTS: Hearing loss at baseline (yes/no) was weakly associated with time to first physician-certified sick leave episode: Hazard ratio (HR) 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.3). Restricting the exposed group to people with both hearing loss and tinnitus, the HR was slightly increased: 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.6). Hearing loss in 1996-1998 was also associated with time to first received disability pension: HR 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.8). Stronger associations were found for disabling hearing loss (PTA > 35). Restricting the exposure to hearing loss and tinnitus, the HR was increased: 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-2.8). CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based cohort study indicates that hearing loss is associated with increased risk of receiving disability pension, especially among younger adults and low educated workers. Hearing loss was weakly associated with sick leave.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Personas con Discapacidad , Pérdida Auditiva , Acúfeno , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pensiones , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Suecia/epidemiología
11.
Front Neurol ; 13: 1094270, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36712418

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aimed to explore the association between hearing loss severity, hearing aid use, and subjective memory complaints in a large cross-sectional study in Norway. Methods: Data were drawn from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4 Hearing, 2017-2019). The hearing threshold was defined as the pure-tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better ear. The participants were divided into five groups: normal hearing or slight/mild/moderate/severe hearing loss. Subjective self-reported short-term and long-term memory complaints were measured by the nine-item Meta-Memory Questionnaire (MMQ). The sample included 20,092 individuals (11,675 women, mean age 58.3 years) who completed both hearing and MMQ tasks. A multivariate analysis of variance (adjusted for covariates of age, sex, education, and health cofounders) was used to evaluate the association between hearing status and hearing aid use (in the hearing-impaired groups) and long-term and short-term subjective memory complaints. Results: A multivariate analysis of variance, followed by univariate ANOVA and pairwise comparisons, showed that hearing loss was associated only with more long-term subjective memory complaints and not with short-term subjective memory complaints. In the hearing-impaired groups, the univariate main effect of hearing aid use was only observed for subjective long-term memory complaints and not for subjective short-term memory complaints. Similarly, the univariate interaction of hearing aid use and hearing status was significant for subjective long-term memory complaints and not for subjective short-term memory complaints. Pairwise comparisons, however, revealed no significant differences between hearing loss groups with respect to subjective long-term complaints. Conclusion: This cross-sectional study indicates an association between hearing loss and subjective long-term memory complaints but not with subjective short-term memory complaints. In addition, an interaction between hearing status and hearing aid use for subjective long-term memory complaints was observed in hearing-impaired groups, which calls for future research to examine the effects of hearing aid use on different memory systems.

12.
Trends Hear ; 25: 23312165211015881, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181492

RESUMEN

It is unclear whether the current average use of personal music players (PMPs) including mobile phones has affected hearing in the general population. The association between the use of PMPs and hearing loss was assessed in a large population cross-sectional and follow-up study with the following distribution: cross-sectional (2018): n = 26,606, 56% women, mean age 54 years and 20-year follow-up (baseline 1998): n = 12,115, 57% women, mean age at baseline 43 years. Hearing threshold was determined as pure-tone average over the frequencies 3, 4, and 6 kHz. We used linear regression to assess relationships between hearing threshold and PMP use (yes), duration (1-2/2-6/>6 h per week), or sound volume (low/medium/high), with nonuse as reference. The PMP use increased from 8% in 1998 to 30% in 2018. Compared with nonusers, neither use nor duration was related to hearing threshold. As to sound volume, listening at low levels was associated with better thresholds (-2.5 dB [-4.1 to -0.8]), while listening at high levels was associated with worse thresholds (1.4 dB [0.1 to 2.8]). We adjusted for age, sex, baseline hearing threshold, education, noise exposure, ear infections, head injury, and daily smoking. The association with sound volume was nearly twice as strong when adjusting for hearing threshold at baseline. Accordingly, the possibility of reverse causality was reduced although not eliminated by the follow-up design. This large population study showed no association between normal PMP use and 20-year progression in hearing; however users listening to high levels increased their hearing threshold.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Reproductor MP3 , Música , Umbral Auditivo , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
13.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 94(5): 1049-1059, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this cohort study were to evaluate possible long-term effects of occupational exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV) in terms of increased tremor. The aims were to evaluate whether exposure during follow-up, baseline hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS), baseline manual dexterity or current medical conditions or life-style habits might be associated with increased tremor. A further aim was to compare two different activation conditions: postural vs rest tremor. METHODS: Forty men (current age: 60.4 years) who had previously worked as manual workers in a specialized engineering and construction company enrolled in the study. Their hand functions had been examined in 1994. At the baseline examination, 27 had been diagnosed with HAVS, while 13 were not exposed. The follow-up examination in 2016-2017 comprised the CATSYS Tremor Pen® for measuring postural and rest tremor and the Grooved Pegboard Test for assessing manual dexterity. Blood samples were taken for assessing biomarkers that might have impact on tremor. RESULTS: Neither cumulative exposure to HAV during follow-up nor HAVS at baseline were associated with increased tremor. A test for manual dexterity at baseline was significantly associated with increased tremor (Tremor Intensity) at follow-up. Blood markers of current medical conditions and tobacco consumption were associated with increased tremor. Rest tremor frequency was higher than postural tremor frequency (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The main findings of this 22-year cohort study were no indications of long-term effects on tremor related to HAV exposure and previous HAVS status. However, baseline manual dexterity was significantly associated with increased tremor at follow-up. Activation conditions (e.g., hand position) are important when testing tremor.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome por Vibración de la Mano y el Brazo/epidemiología , Temblor/epidemiología , Vibración/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Industria de la Construcción , Ingeniería , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional , Fumar/epidemiología , Temblor/sangre
14.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 242, 2021 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The hearing function at a given age seems to have improved in more recent born cohorts in industrialized countries. But the reasons for the improvement have not yet been explained. METHODS: We investigated the extent to which better hearing in Norway is attributed to modifiable risk factors by using representative demographic and audiometric data from two cohorts of the Trøndelag Health Study, HUNT2 (1996-1998) and HUNT4 (2017-2019). We estimated natural indirect effects using causal inference methods in order to assess whether cohort improvement in hearing thresholds (HTs) was mediated by occupational noise exposure, recurrent ear infections, smoking and education. RESULTS: The improvement in HTs from HUNT2 to HUNT4 was 2.8 and 3.0 dB at low respectively high frequencies. Together all risk factors mediated this improvement by 0.8 dB (95% CI 0.7-0.9) and 0.8 dB (95% CI 0.7-0.9) respectively, corresponding to mediated proportions of 27 and 28%. Substantial mediation was specifically found for occupational noise in men and recurrent ear infections in women (mediated proportions of 11 and 17% at high frequencies, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased education, less occupational noise exposure, ear infections and smoking contributed considerably to better hearing in Norway the last two decades.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo , Audiometría , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Masculino , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Noruega/epidemiología
15.
Ear Hear ; 42(1): 42-52, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To obtain updated robust data on a age-specific prevalence of hearing loss in Norway and determine whether more recent birth cohorts have better hearing compared with earlier birth cohorts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyzes of Norwegian representative demographic and audiometric data from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)-HUNT2 Hearing (1996-1998) and HUNT4 Hearing (2017-2019), with the following distribution: HUNT2 Hearing (N=50,277, 53% women, aged 20 to 101 years, mean = 50.1, standard deviation = 16.9); HUNT4 Hearing (N=28,339, 56% women, aged 19 to 100 years, mean = 53.2, standard deviation = 16.9). Pure-tone hearing thresholds were estimated using linear and quantile regressions with age and cohort as explanatory variables. Prevalences were estimated using logistic regression models for different severities of hearing loss averaged over 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better ear (BE PTA4). We also estimated prevalences at the population-level of Norway in 1997 and 2018. RESULTS: Disabling hearing loss (BE PTA4 ≥ 35 dB) was less prevalent in the more recent born cohort at all ages in both men and women (p < 0.0001), with the largest absolute decrease at age 75 in men and at age 85 in women. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of disabling hearing loss was 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.5 to 7.9) and 5.3% (95% CI 5.0 to 5.5) in HUNT2 and HUNT4, respectively. Hearing thresholds were better in the more recent born cohorts at all frequencies for both men and women (p < 0.0001), with the largest improvement at high frequencies in more recent born 60- to 70-year old men (10 to 11 dB at 3 to 4 kHz), and at low frequencies among the oldest. CONCLUSIONS: The age- and sex-specific prevalence of hearing impairment has decreased in Norway from 1996-1998 to 2017-2019.


Asunto(s)
Audición , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Prevalencia
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 189(11): 1342-1347, 2020 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440685

RESUMEN

It has been suggested that the association between self-reported occupational noise exposure and vestibular schwannoma (VS), found in several studies, represents recall bias. Therefore, we aimed to study the relationship in a large case-control study using occupational noise measurements. We performed a case-control study using data from Sweden for 1,913 VS cases diagnosed in 1961-2009 and 9,566 age- and sex-matched population controls. We defined occupational history by linkage to national censuses from 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990. We estimated occupational noise exposure for each case and control using a job-exposure matrix. There was no association between occupational noise exposure and VS. Among subjects assessed as ever exposed to occupational noise levels of ≥85 dB (214 cases and 1,142 controls), the odds ratio for VS per 5 years of exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.17). Workers with noise levels of ≥85 dB for at least 15 years (5-year latency period), showed no increased risk of VS (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.31) compared with those who had never been exposed to noise levels of 75 dB or higher. In summary, our large study does not support an association between occupational noise exposure and VS.


Asunto(s)
Neuroma Acústico/epidemiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Suecia/epidemiología
17.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(6): 535-542, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187713

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A large population study with adequate data on confounders is required to determine whether asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) is associated with occupational noise exposure. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional population study in Norway (the Health Investigation in Nord-Trøndelag: HUNT) with 24 183 participants, using pure-tone audiometry and questionnaires. AHL was defined as a difference in hearing threshold between the right and left ears of greater than or equal to 15 dB for the pure-tone average of 0.5 to 2 or 3 to 6 kHz. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 53 years (range, 19-99); 53% were women. The prevalence of AHL in this general Norwegian population was 6% for the 0.5 to 2 kHz range and 15% for 3 to 6 kHz. In unadjusted regression models, subjects reporting prolonged occupational noise exposure to high-level noise sources (N = 1652) had a higher risk of AHL at 3 to 6 kHz than those reporting no prior exposure (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-2.25). After adjustment for age and sex, OR was 1.08; (95% CI, 0.95-1.24). After additional adjustment for head trauma, ear infections, blasting or shooting (all associated with AHL), smoking, and diabetes, OR was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.87-1.16). No association between occupational noise and right-ear hearing threshold advantage (left-right ear difference) was observed after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that AHL is relatively common in the general population, especially at the high-frequency range in men and elderly subjects. Our study showed no relation between occupational noise exposure and AHL after confounder adjustment.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría de Tonos Puros/estadística & datos numéricos , Umbral Auditivo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Noruega/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Análisis de Regresión , Adulto Joven
18.
Ear Hear ; 41(1): 67-71, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30998545

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The pathogenesis of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) includes complex interactions between microbial, immunologic, and genetic factors. To our knowledge, no study has focused on the association between childhood otitis media, immune regulation, inflammatory conditions, and chronic disease in adulthood. The present study aims to assess whether CSOM in childhood predicts immune-related inflammatory disorders or cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Another aim is to assess the association with oto-vestibular diseases in adulthood. DESIGN: Population cohort study in Norway comprised 51,626 participants (mean age 52 years) who underwent a hearing investigation at 7 to 13 years of age where 189 were diagnosed with CSOM (otorhinolaryngologist diagnose) and 51,437 had normal hearing thresholds (controls). Data on adult disease were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (ICD-10 codes from the specialist health services). We estimated associations with logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The associations between CSOM in childhood and disease in adulthood were as follows: chronic sinusitis (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 8.52); cardiovascular disease (1.38, 1.01 to 1.88); hearing loss (5.58, 3.78 to 8.22); tinnitus (2.62, 1.07 to 6.41). The adult hearing loss among cases with childhood CSOM was most frequently registered as sensorineural. There was no statistically significant increased risk of later asthma (1.84 [0.98 to 3.48]), inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory joint disease, systemic tissue disease, or vestibulopathy. The estimates were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic status, and smoking. CONCLUSION: Our large cohort study, which is the first to focus on the link between otitis media in childhood and immune-related inflammatory disorders later in life, does not confer a clear association. CSOM in childhood was strongly related to adult tinnitus and hearing loss, which was most frequently registered as sensorineural.


Asunto(s)
Otitis Media Supurativa , Otitis Media , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Otitis Media/epidemiología
19.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 139(12)2019 Sep 10.
Artículo en Noruego, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The hospital departments for occupational medicine and the National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI) established a shared, anonymous patient register in 2009. This report describes the diagnoses, occupations and exposure factors that occur most frequently in the youngest patient group. This will reflect exposures in modern working life in particular, and thus produce important knowledge with regard to targeted prevention efforts. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We have undertaken a descriptive analysis of 910 examinations of patients in the age group 20-29 years, performed in occupational medicine departments in Norway during the period 2010-17. RESULTS: Examinations of patients aged 20-29 years accounted for 914 (8 %) of a total of 11 969 recorded patient examinations. We excluded four participants for whom information on their sex was missing. This age group encompassed 498 (55 %) men, compared to 75 % men in the total dataset. The most frequent diagnoses were asthma (187/910, 21 %), contact eczema (184/910, 20 %) and rhinitis (73/910, 8 %). The most frequent exposure factors were irritants/allergens (469/910, 52 %). The most common occupations were hairdresser (159/910, 17 %) and painter/varnisher (46/910, 5 %). Hairdresser was the predominant occupation among women (154/412, 37 %), while painter/varnisher (35/498, 7 %) and electrician (25/498, 5 %) predominated among men. INTERPRETATION: Young patients who are examined in occupational medicine departments in Norway are most frequently registered with asthma or hand eczema. Hairdressers are especially exposed, indicating a special need for primary prevention in this occupation to prevent development of illness. In cases of asthma and hand eczema, doctors should be aware of the possibility that this might be occupationally related.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Peluquería , Dermatitis por Contacto/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Electricidad/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Medicina del Trabajo , Pintura/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Rinitis/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
20.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 168, 2019 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is a global public health problem putting millions of people at risk of experiencing impediments in communication and potentially impaired mental health. Many studies in this field are based on small, cross sectional samples using self-report measures. The present study aims to investigate the association between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and mental health in adult men and women longitudinally in a large cohort with a matched control group, and hearing is measured by pure-tone audiometry. Studies of this kind are virtually non-existing. METHODS: The present study combines data from two large studies; the School Hearing Investigation in Nord-Trøndelag (SHINT) carried out yearly from 1954 to 1986, and the second wave of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2) conducted from 1995 to 1997. The participants were 7, 10 or 13 years during the SHINT, and between 20 and 56 years old during HUNT 2. The total sample consisted of 32,456 participants (of which 32,104 in the reference group). Participants with a sensorineural hearing loss in SHINT of 41 dB or more were classified with moderate-severe hearing loss (N = 66), 26-40 dB as mild (N = 66) and 16-25 dB as slight (N = 220). Mental health in adulthood was measured in HUNT 2 by symptoms of anxiety and depression, subjective well-being, and self-esteem. The association between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and adult mental health was tested by means of ANOVA. RESULTS: There was a significant relation between slight childhood sensorineural hearing loss and lowered subjective well-being in women (B = -.25, p = 0.038). Further investigation of the results revealed a significant association between slight hearing loss and symptoms of anxiety and depression (B = .30, p = 0.054) and between mild hearing loss and lowered self-esteem (B = .63, p = 0.024) among women aged 20-39 years. There were no significant relations between childhood sensorineural hearing loss and any of the three mental health outcomes among men. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that women with slight or mild sensorineural hearing loss from childhood experience elevated levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression, lowered subjective well-being and lowered self-esteem. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to a lack of power in some analyses.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...