Precision of 30 guided implants in complex tumour situations.

Implant born prosthetic rehabilitation of tumour patients can be difficult to perform. Challenges in treating such patients include disrupted anatomy with limited mouth opening due to previous ablative surgery as well as free-flaps or simple bone grafts, adjuvant therapy such as radiotherapy and, in general, poorer general health. Combining classical knowledge of ideal prosthesis placement and current virtual planning possibilities the positioning and in consequence the survival of dental implants can be optimised. Since prosthetic rehabilitation has a positive effect on the patients' quality of life and general health, we propose performing such surgeries as early as possible. All patients at our institution receiving pre-planned guided implant reconstruction and postoperative evaluation with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) between 2015 and 2018 were evaluated for inclusion. Eight patients with a total of 30 implants met the inclusion criteria. The planned implant position was compared to the outcome position by fusing the two and deviations in entry-point position, apex-position, angular deviation and depth error were recorded. The mean (SD) discrepancy at entry-point was 2.28 (1.45) mm and 2.89 (1.53) mm at the apex, respectively. Mean (SD) angulation discrepancy was 9.5˚ (4.13˚) and the mean (SD) depth deviation was 1.52 (0.86) mm. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of pre-planned implant placement in challenging clinical situations and that only few concessions have to be made for precision.

The human brain response to dental pain relief.

Local anesthesia has made dental treatment more comfortable since 1884, but little is known about associated brain mechanisms. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a modern neuroimaging tool widely used for investigating human brain activity related to sensory perceptions, including pain. Most brain regions that respond to experimental noxious stimuli have recently been found to react not only to nociception alone, but also to visual, auditory, and other stimuli. Thus, presumed functional attributions have come under scrutiny regarding selective pain processing in the brain. Evidently, innovative approaches are warranted to identify cerebral regions that are nociceptive specific. In this study, we aimed at circumventing known methodological confounders by applying a novel paradigm in 14 volunteers: rather than varying the intensity and thus the salience of painful stimuli, we applied repetitive noxious dental stimuli at constant intensity to the left mandibular canine. During the functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm, we suppressed the nociceptive barrage by a mental nerve block. Brain activity before and after injection of 4% articaine was compared intraindividually on a group level. Dental pain extinction was observed to correspond to activity reduction in a discrete region of the left posterior insular cortex. These results confirm previous reports demonstrating that direct electrical stimulation of this brain region-but not of others-evokes bodily pain sensations. Hence, our investigation adds further evidence to the notion that the posterior insula plays a unique role in nociceptive processing.