T1 hypointense brain lesions in NMOSD and its relevance with disability: a single institution cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: T1 hypointense lesions are considered a surrogate marker of tissue destruction. Although there is a shortage of evidence about T1 hypointense brain lesions, black holes, in patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), the clinical significance of these lesions is not well determined. OBJECTIVES: The impact of T1 hypointense brain lesions on the clinical status and the disability level of patients with NMOSD was sought in this study. METHODS: A total of 83 patients with the final diagnosis of NMOSD were recruited. Aquaporin-4 measures were collected. The expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and MRI studies were also extracted. T1 hypointense and T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions were investigated. The correlation of MRI findings, AQP-4, and EDSS was assessed. RESULTS: T1 hypointense brain lesions were detected in 22 patients. Mean ± SD EDSS was 3.7 ± 1.5 and significantly higher in patients with brain T1 hypointense lesions than those without them (p-value = 0.01). Noticeably, patients with more than four T1 hypointense lesions had EDSS scores ≥ 4. The presence of T2/FLAIR hyperintense brain lesions correlated with EDSS (3.6 ± 1.6 vs 2.3 ± 1.7; p-value = 0.01). EDSS was similar between those with and without positive AQP-4 (2.7 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.7; p-value = 0.17). Also, positive AQP-4 was not more prevalent in patients with T1 hypointense brain lesions than those without them (50.9 vs 45.4%; p-value = 0.8). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the presence of the brain T1-hypointense lesions corresponds to a higher disability level in NMOSD.

Comparing infusion-related reactions of the first full dose (600 mg) biosimilar ocrelizumab administration with the standard divided protocol in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized controlled trial study.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is a humanized antiCD20, thought to be a highly effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Its most frequent adverse effects are infusion-related reactions (IRRs). To reduce these reactions, the first dose of ocrelizumab is administered as two 300 mg infusions separated by two weeks. However, in the phase II trial of ocrelizumab, severe IRRs were not significantly different between two doses of 600 mg dose (two separate 300 mg doses) and 2000 mg dose (two separate 1000 mg doses). We compared the IRRs in undivided full (one 600 mg) and divided (two 300 mg) doses of ocrelizumab which is the standard protocol. METHODS: MS patients (relapsing or primary progressive MS) who are selected to receive ocrelizumab by neurologist or MS fellowship were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Iranian biosimilar of the drug (Xacrel® by Cinnagen, approved by the Iranian Food and Drug Administration in 2021) was used. The participants received the first dose of ocrelizumab as either one 600 mg dose in one session or two 300 mg doses in two weeks apart. IRRs during or in the first 24 h after infusion were recorded. RESULTS: Of 332 participants, 150 received two 300 mg doses, and 182 received one 600 mg dose (by random selection). Life-threatening adverse effects were not observed in both groups. Overnight admission or permanent drug discontinuation was not needed. Temporary drug discontinuation was significantly higher in the one 600 mg dose group (p-value < 0.001). During the infusions, malaise (p-value: 0.003), skin reactions (p-value: 0.04), throat swelling (p-value: 0.03), and dyspnea (p-value: 0.01) were significantly increased in the intervention group. However, in the first 24 h, there was no significant difference between two different treatment protocols (one 600 mg dose or two 300 mg doses) in the onset of IRRS (p-value: 0.12). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest one 600 mg dose of ocrelizumab administration for the first dose is relatively safe. With some protocol modifications, it could lead to fewer patient referrals, saving time and cost and improvement the access for patients.

Complications and Treatment of Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

Context: Global reports have revealed a dramatic rise in the number of patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) over the past three decades in all age groups, even in children and adolescents. The physiologic phenomenon of insulin resistance during puberty, as well as genetic and epigenetic factors, are implicated in this phenomenon. It seems that patients with early-onset T2DM experience a more aggressive clinical course; however, limited treatments available for these patients pose a challenge. This narrative review intends to scrutinize the micro- and macrovascular complications and treatments of patients with early-onset T2DM. Methods: The literature search was conducted in the PubMed database to identify all relevant original English articles published from the beginning of 2018 until January 2023. Results: Vascular complications, such as albuminuria, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and retinopathy, were seen to be more common in early-onset T2DM compared to type 1 diabetes. The odds ratio of vascular complications was higher in early-onset compared to late-onset T2DM. In children and adolescents with T2DM, the only approved medications included metformin, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists. Treatment of early-onset T2DM with metformin monotherapy cannot yield durable glycemic control, and most patients need early combination therapy. Conclusions: During the past years, the frequency of early-onset T2DM has been growing at an alarming rate. Vascular complications in these patients seem more aggressive and more challenging to control. Hence, further clinical trials should be conducted to develop novel therapeutic approaches and evaluate their long-term benefits in terms of glycemic control and preventing future complications.