RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the surgical outcomes of DISE and non-DISE-guided surgery in cases with obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with severe OSA and BMI ≤35 kg/m2 were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into group A where surgical intervention was performed without DISE, and group B where surgery was planned according to the findings of DISE. RESULTS: In group A, the mean AHI, LO2, and Snoring index showed a highly significant improvement (P < 0.0001). Group B had highly significant improvements as regards PSG data (P < 0.0001). High significant differences exist when comparing the operative time of both groups (P < 0.0001). On comparing the success rates in both groups, no statistically significant differences were reported (p = 0.6885). CONCLUSION: Preoperative topo-diagnosis with DISE does not significantly affect the surgical outcomes in OSA. Primary OSA cases could benefit from a no-DISE cost-effective surgical protocol that entails multilevel surgical interventions in a reasonable time.