Is there a role for 18F-FDG PET-CT in Familial Mediterranean fever? A case report and overview of the literature.

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive disorder that is characterised by recurrent attacks of fever and painful polyserositis mainly affecting the peritoneum, synovium and pleura that usually begins in childhood. Even though diagnostic criteria have been proposed, conclusive imaging findings or haematological markers for the diagnosis or follow-up of FMF are still lacking. In this case report we present the 18F-FDG PET-CT findings in a 55 year old female during an attack of FMF. We briefly discuss the added value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis and the work-up of FMF, which may open up new applications for 18F-FDG PET-CT in non-infectious inflammatory diseases.

Non-invasive evaluation of orthotopic heart transplant rejection by echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant recipients require frequent myocardial biopsies to screen for acute rejection. The purpose of this study was to identify demographic and echocardiographic factors associated with transplant rejection and develop a predictive model, which may reduce the number of cardiac biopsies. METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2001, we performed 406 echocardiographic studies on 264 heart transplant patients who had biopsies performed on the same day. Two-dimensional, pulsed and tissue Doppler echocardiographic variables were compared between patients with and without rejection, and their predictive ability for detecting rejection was determined by uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In 268 biopsies there was no significant rejection (ISHLT Grade <==II), whereas 138 showed rejection (ISHLT Grade > or =IIIa). By multivariate analysis, pericardial effusion, isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) <90 milliseconds and mitral inflow E/A ratio >1.7, diameter of inferior vena cava and duration of pulmonary vein atrial reversal were independently associated with rejection. Because the odds ratios were similar for all 5 predictors, a simplified model was developed based on the sum of the number of abnormal predictors present (0 to 5). The probability of rejection increased from 15.9%, in the absence of any predictor, to 39.7%, 52.0% and 71.1%, if 1, 2 or 3 predictors were present, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recipient age, pericardial effusion, IVRT and ratio of pulsed Doppler E/A are significant predictors of acute cardiac allograft rejection. However, no single predictor or combination of predictors were powerful enough to eliminate surveillance endomyocardial biopsies.

Does rapid volume loading during transesophageal echocardiography differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy?

BACKGROUND: Respiratory variation of the pulmonary venous (PV) peak flow velocities can be used to distinguish constrictive pericarditis (constriction) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (restriction). Rapid volume expansion has been used successfully to enhance diastolic pressure equalization in occult constriction. The effect of volume on the respiratory variation in constriction has not been studied previously. This study assessed the utility of volume in enhancing the PV respiratory variation of constriction to further separate it from restriction. METHODS: The study population consisted of 15 patients referred to the echocardiography laboratory for further evaluation of clinically suspected diastolic dysfunction. Pulsed-Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the left or right upper pulmonary vein and mitral inflow was performed with respiratory monitoring before and after infusion of 1 liter of normal saline over 5 to 10 minutes. The classification of patients as constriction (n = 8) or restriction (n = 7) was confirmed independently by cardiac catheterization or surgery. Peak velocities of the PV systolic and diastolic waves and the mitral inflow E were measured during inspiration and expiration. A mean of 3-6 respiratory cycles was obtained for each value before and after volume loading. The percent change from expiration to inspiration (%E) was calculated using the formula %E = expiration - inspiration / expiration. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with constrictive pericarditis can be separated reliably from those with restrictive cardiomyopathy based on a higher systolic/diastolic ratio and greater respiratory variation of their PV diastolic flow velocity. There were no complications in any patient due to volume expansion. Although the change from baseline to volume expansion was not statistically significant in either constriction or restriction, the %E of the PV diastolic wave became significantly higher in constriction than in restriction (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid volume expansion is relatively safe during TEE and can be used for further separation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by significantly enhancing the respiratory variation of the PV diastolic flow velocity in constrictive pericarditis.