Changing patterns of bacterial profile and antimicrobial resistance in high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary oncology hospital.

The widespread evolution of phenotypic resistance in clinical isolates over the years, coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic onset, has exacerbated the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to explore changes in bacterial infection patterns and antimicrobial resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study involved the periods before and during COVID-19: the pre-pandemic and pandemic eras. The surveillance results of bacterial isolates causing infections in cancer patients at an Egyptian tertiary oncology hospital were retrieved. The Vitek®2 or Phoenix systems were utilized for species identification and susceptibility testing. Statistical analyses were performed comparing microbiological trends before and during the pandemic. Out of 2856 bacterial isolates, Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) predominated (69.7%), and Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) comprised 30.3% of isolates. No significant change was found in GNB prevalence during the pandemic (P = 0.159). Elevated rates of Klebsiella and Pseudomonas species were demonstrated during the pandemic, as was a decrease in E. coli and Acinetobacter species (P < 0.001, 0.018, < 0.001, and 0.046, respectively) in hematological patients. In surgical patients, Enterobacteriaceae significantly increased (P = 0.012), while non-fermenters significantly decreased (P = 0.007). GPB species from either hematological or surgical wards exhibited no notable changes during the pandemic. GNB resistance increased in hematological patients to carbapenems, amikacin, and tigecycline and decreased in surgical patients to amikacin and cefoxitin (P < 0.001, 0.010, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.016, respectively). The study highlights notable shifts in the microbial landscape during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the prevalence and resistance patterns of GNB in hematological and surgical wards.

The impact of increasing non-albicans Candida trends on diagnostics in immunocompromised patients.

Invasive candidiasis (IC) represents a growing concern worldwide, with a considerable increase in non-albicans Candida (NAC) species. The study's primary goal was to determine if species identification by semi-nested PCR (sn-PCR) with primers for the five most prevalent Candida species is sufficient to deal with the current trends of Candida infections in cancer patients. Over one year, Candida isolates were collected from samples of patients with hematological and solid organ tumors in a single center. Species of Candida were identified by chromagar and multiplex sn-PCR using specific primers for Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, and the Candida parapsilosis complex. Most Candida infection episodes are caused by NAC species (70.5% of 105 isolates). Rare species (14 isolates) accounted for 13.3% of isolates and were not identified by sn-PCR using the five most common Candida species primers. More than half of these rare species caused candidemia in cancer patients (57.1%; p = 0.011). The risk factor for candidiasis was recent surgeries (p = 0.020) in adults and chemotherapy in pediatric patients (p = 0.006). Prolonged hospitalization and genitourinary tract cancer were significantly associated with invasive infections (p = 0.005 and 0.049, respectively). Recent surgery was a significant risk factor associated with C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata infections (P = 0.038 and 0.003, respectively), while C. tropicalis was significantly more common in patients with hematological malignancies (P = 0.012). Techniques with a broader identification spectrum than the major five Candida species are crucial for the optimal management of cancer patients.

Alarming Increase of Azole-Resistant Candida Causing Blood Stream Infections in Oncology Patients in Egypt.

Candidemia is a life-threatening invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. The widespread use of azoles and the shift toward non-albicans Candida (NAC) species remarkably increase azole resistance in developing countries. We aimed to study candidemia trends and associated risk factors in oncology patients since they vary geographically, and rapid and appropriate treatment improves outcomes. Vitek 2 was used to identify the Candida species, and the E-test determined their susceptibility to azoles. Candida was the cause of 3.1% (n = 53/1701) of bloodstream infections (BSIs) during a 1-year study. Candida tropicalis was the most predominant species among the 30 candidemia episodes studied (36.7%), followed by C. albicans (33.3%). However, C. krusei, C. guilliermondii, C. pelliculosa, C. parapsilosis, C. famata, and C. inconspicua accounted for 30.0% of the isolates. An increased risk of NAC BSI was significantly associated with chemotherapy and leucopenia (P = 0.036 and 0.016, respectively). However, the multivariable analysis revealed that leucopenia was the only independent risk factor (P = 0.048). Fluconazole and voriconazole resistance were 58.3% and 16.7%, with NAC species showing higher resistance rates than C. albicans. Both fluconazole and voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) median values were higher in NAC than in C. albicans, but only voriconazole was significantly higher (0.220 versus 0.048 µg/ml, P = 0.047). In conclusion, the increased prevalence of NAC BSIs and incredibly high fluconazole resistance rates in cancer patients emphasize the necessity of antifungal stewardship to preserve voriconazole effectiveness, continued surveillance of candidemia, and future studies into azole resistance molecular mechanisms.