The impact of loco-regional treatment modality on the outcomes in breast cancer patients younger than forty years of age.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of the loco-regional treatment modality, on the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients younger than 40 years. METHODS: Data of 623 breast cancer patients younger than 40 years of age were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to the locoregional treatment approach into three groups: the mastectomy group (M), the mastectomy followed by radiation therapy group (MRX) and the breast conservative therapy group (BCT). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 72 months (range, 6-180). Two hundred and nine patients were treated with BCT, 86 with MRM and 328 with MRX. The 10-year rate LRR rates according to treatment modality were: 13.4% for BCT, 15.1% for MRM and 8.5% for MRX (p 0.106). On univariate analysis, T stage (p 0.009), AJCC stage (p 0.047) and Her 2 status (p 0.001) were associated with LRR. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 72.7% (78.5% in the BCT group, 69.8% in the MRM group and 69.8% in the MRX group, p 0.072). On Univariate analysis, age < 35 (p 0.032), grade III (p 0.001), N3 stage (p 0.001), AJCC stage III (p 0.005), ER negative status (0.04), Her 2-status positive (0.006) and lack of chemotherapy administration (p 0.02) were all predictors of increased mortality. CONCLUSION: For patients younger than 40 years of age, similar LRR and overall survival outcomes were achieved using BCT, M or MRX. Young age at diagnosis should not be used alone in recommending one loco-regional treatment approach over the others.

Treatment results of Para-Testicular Rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS) using radiation as an alternative to retro-peritoneal nodal dissection: A single Institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Para-testicular Rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS) has a favorable treatment outcome adopting multidisciplinary management; resection, namely high inguinal orchiectomy ± retro-peritoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) followed by standard or intensive chemotherapy ± adjuvant radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study including all patients with pathologically proven PT-RMS, presented to the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, during the period from 2005 to 2020. Endpoints included overall survival, disease free survival and patterns of failure of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: Forty one patients were identified. Median age in our cohort was 15 years (range: 2-54 years). After a median follow up of 26 months (range, 3-75 months) ,two and five years OS were 100% and 91.7% respectively and median survival was not reached. Patients who underwent retro-peritoneal nodal dissection had a 5-year DFS rate of 100% versus 73% for those who received radiation to para-aortic nodes (p = 0.185). Limitations include retrospective nature and deviation from COG protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows promising results suggesting that less aggressive local treatment modalities including radiation to para-aortic chain could be an option in PT-RMS, given the excellent results of this subtype. However further validation in a prospective study is warranted.

Role of pelvic chemoradiation therapy in patients with initially metastatic anal canal cancer: A National Cancer Database review.

BACKGROUND: Although the management of localized anal canal squamous cell carcinomas is well established, the role of pelvic chemoradiation (CRT) in the treatment of patients presenting with synchronous metastatic (stage IV) disease is poorly defined. This study used a national cancer database to compare the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with synchronous metastatic disease receiving CRT to the pelvis and patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone. METHODS: This study included adult patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinomas presenting with synchronous metastases diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Multiple imputation and 2:1 propensity score matching were used to create a matched data set for testing. The proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the effect of the treatment group on OS. With only patients in the matched data set, the OS of the treatment groups was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method by treatment group. RESULTS: This study started with an unmatched data set of 978 patients, and 582 patients were selected for the matched data set: 388 in the CRT group and 194 in the CT-alone group. The HR for the group effect was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.92; P = .006). The median OS was 21.1 months in the CRT group (95% CI, 17.4-24.0 months) and 14.6 months in the CT group (95% CI, 12.2-18.4 months). The corresponding 5-year OS rates were 23% (95% CI, 18%-28%) and 14% (95% CI, 7%-21%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series analyzing OS in patients with stage IV anal cancer, CRT was associated with improved OS in comparison with CT alone. Because of the lack of prospective data in this setting, this evidence will help to guide treatment approaches in this group of patients.