Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Egypt J Immunol ; 31(1): 116-123, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224276

RESUMEN

Lupus nephritis (LN) affects almost two-thirds of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Renal biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of LN. However, repeated biopsies are not always performed in clinical practice, and they carry some risk. Therefore, minimally invasive techniques, as urinary biomarkers, are promising tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of SLE. Previous studies evaluated urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in patients with SLE, reported higher levels of urinary MCP-1 in patients with active LN than non-active LN. Other studies reported higher levels of urinary MCP-1 in LN patients with proliferative forms (III and IV). This study aimed to evaluate urinary MCP-1 as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker tool for LN, and to determine its association with different LN histopathological stages and chronicity indices. The study included 40 SLE patients with biopsy-proven LN class II, III, IV or V, and 20 patients with inactive LN as a control group. In LN active patients, the mean creatinine was 1.71 ± 0.55 mg/dl, and 0.84 ± 0.10 mg/dl in the control group. The mean MCP-1 level was 618.4 ± 294.2 ng/l in active LN patients and 120.05 ± 87.53 ng/l in inactive LN patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated a better diagnostic performance of MCP-1 than conventional biomarkers. At area under the curve of 0.990, the best cut-off level was >245 ng/L (sensitivity 97.5 %, Specificity 95 %). In conclusion, urinary MCP-1 distinguished active LN from inactive renal disease. It can be proposed as a good noninvasive diagnostic biomarker with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of LN activity..


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nefritis Lúpica , Humanos , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Proteínas Quimioatrayentes de Monocitos , Egipto , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores
2.
Egypt J Immunol ; 29(4): 106-114, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206153

RESUMEN

Immunoglobulin light chains are classified as middle molecule uremic toxins and its removal through effective dialyzer is needed with less albumin loss. This study assessed the free light chains (FLC) removal using dialyzer surface area (SA) 2.6m2 in high-flux dialysis (HF-HD) versus hemodiafiltration (HDF) and its relation to cumulative dialysate albumin loss. This pilot cross-over study included 25 patients who underwent hemodialysis (HD) using dialyzer surface area 2.6m2 on HF-HD followed by online post-dilution HDF with washout period of 2 weeks using high-flux dialyzers (max 2.0 m2 SA). All patients were subjected to single session measurement of dialysate albumin every hour and pre/post dialysis levels of FLC Kappa (Κ) and Lambda (λ) by ELISA. Dialyzer (SA) 2.6m2 showed a significant reduction in post-dialysis kappa and lambda level in comparison to pre-dialysis level on HF-HD and hemodiafiltration (P<0.001). HDF showed higher kappa and lambda FLC reduction ratio (45.16 ± 6.53 %, 28.68 ± 4.36 %, respectively compared to HF-HD (29.52 ± 6.38 %, 19.48 ± 1.96, respectively, P<0.001 for both). Patients on HDF dialysis had significant total albumin loss in dialysate [median (IQR) 2.97; 1.98 - 3.37 gm] compared to HF-HD [median (IQR) 0.67; 0.49 - 1.13 gm] (P <0.001). In conclusion, high-flux dialyzer 2.6 m2 (SA) may be effective in free light chains removal especially with online post-dilution hemodiafiltration with acceptable albumin loss.


Asunto(s)
Hemodiafiltración , Albúminas/análisis , Estudios Cruzados , Diálisis , Soluciones para Diálisis , Humanos , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...