International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measure instruments include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported goals (PRGs), which allow practitioners to measure symptoms and determine outcomes of treatment that matter to patients. METHODS: This is a structured review completed by the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC), sponsored by the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The aim of this working group was to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence for PROs and PRGs in the initial clinical work-up/evaluation and research arena for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). RESULTS: The initial search generated 3589 non-duplicated studies. After abstract review by 4 authors, 211 full texts were assessed for eligibility by 2 writing group members, and 199 studies were reviewed in detail. Any disagreements on abstract or full-text articles were resolved by a third reviewer or during video meetings as a group. The list of POP PROs and information on PRGs was developed from these articles. Tables were generated to describe the validation of each PRO and to provide currently available, validated translations. CONCLUSIONS: All patients presenting for POP should be evaluated for vaginal, bladder, bowel and sexual symptoms including their goals for symptom treatment. This screening can be facilitated by a validated PRO; however, most PROs provide more information than needed to provide clinical care and were designed for research purposes.

Pilot study exploring the incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms during pregnancy in a district general hospital in Northern Ireland: a prospective survey.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) during pregnancy with a prospective survey in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pregnant women over the age of 18 years booked for shared antenatal care at a district general hospital were asked to complete a validated 14-stem questionnaire enquiring about lower urinary tract symptoms. (ICIQ-FLUTS). Primary outcome measure was completion of the ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaire. Secondary analysis included the prevalence and odds ratios of individual symptoms that make up the ICIQ-FLUTS score. RESULTS: In all, 383 women completed the questionnaire. The most common symptom reported was urgency with a prevalence of 80%. Urgency was over twice as likely to be reported in those with a BMI > 30. The next most common symptom reported was stress incontinence with 65% of participants reporting some leakage on exertion. The likelihood of reporting stress incontinence increased with parity, BMI > 30 and participants in the third trimester with odds ratios of 1.81, 2.07 and 2.09, respectively. Women were almost four times more likely to report any type of urinary incontinence if they had had a vaginal birth in their first pregnancy compared to those who had a caesarean section and women who had a forceps delivery were seven times more likely to report incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: The antenatal period may represent an important opportunity for health promotion and intervention. The high prevalence of LUTS in our antenatal population highlights the need to educate women on bladder care.