Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Life Sci ; 258: 118178, 2020 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739468

RESUMEN

AIMS: Gentamicin (GEN) is one of the most valuable aminoglycoside antibiotics utilized against life-threatening bacterial infections. Unfortunately, GEN-induced nephrotoxicity limited its clinical utility. The pathologic process of nephrotoxicity caused by GEN may involve epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). Resveratrol (RES) is a natural compound was revealed to inhibit EMT in kidney. The present work was conducted to explore the potential renoprotective role of RES on GEN-induced EMT. Moreover, the underlying signaling pathway of this inhibition was investigated. MAIN METHODS: Mice were treated with GEN by intraperitoneal (i.p.) route daily for 15 days to identify EMT onset with regard to GEN-induced nephrotoxicity. To assess the ameliorative role of RES against GEN-induced EMT, RES was i.p. administrated in high and low doses before and concurrently with GEN treatment. KEY FINDINGS: GEN administration significantly deteriorated kidney functions. In addition, reduced glutathione (GSH) content and catalase (CAT) activity were significantly decreased with a concomitant increase in the content of kidney malondialdehyde (MDA) after GEN treatment. Histological changes and deposition of collagen were extensive in renal corpuscles and tubules. Increased expression of alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) and phosphorylated (p)-Smad2 were observed after GEN administration, while E-cadherin expression was decreased. On the contrary, pretreatment with both doses of RES reversed the modifications caused by GEN administration. SIGNIFICANCE: We concluded that EMT contributes to pathogenesis of GEN-induced nephrotoxicity. RES has a protective effect on GEN-induced EMT via suppressing oxidative stress and a possible involvement of TGF-ß/Smad signaling pathway.


Asunto(s)
Transición Epitelial-Mesenquimal/efectos de los fármacos , Gentamicinas/efectos adversos , Riñón/metabolismo , Riñón/patología , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Resveratrol/farmacología , Proteínas Smad/metabolismo , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Animales , Biomarcadores/sangre , Fibrosis , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ratones , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Resveratrol/administración & dosificación , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Life Sci ; 252: 117679, 2020 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325134

RESUMEN

AIM: The neuronal damage and accompanied functional deficits induced by cerebral ischemia are among the most common causes of disabilities in adults. Activation of subtypes of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs); PPAR-α and PPAR-γ have shown neuroprotective effects in different neurodegenerative diseases including stroke. Thus, this study aimed to compare the effects of two different agonists: PPAR-α (fenofibrate) and PPAR-γ (pioglitazone) as well as the effect of their combination in ameliorating post-ischemia behavioral deficits. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were either pretreated with vehicle, fenofibrate (100 mg/kg/day p.o), pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day p.o) or their combination for 14 days prior to bilateral common carotid artery occlusion followed by reperfusion for 24 hoursh. The sensory motor functions of rats were assessed, then rats were sacrificed to determine infarct volume and histopathological changes as well as oxidative stress, inflammatory and apoptotic markers in the brain tissue. KEY FINDINGS: Pre-treatment with fenofibrate and pioglitazone in addition to their combination improved neurobehavioral dysfunction, reduced cerebral infarct volume, attenuated inflammatory and apoptotic markers and ameliorated histopathological changes in I/R injured rats. The effect of pioglitazone in cerebral cortex was higher than its corresponding effect in fenofibrate while the combined administration of both drugs had additive neuroprotective effect and normalized inflammatory and apoptotic mediators in ischemic rats. SIGNIFICANCE: The study compared the neuroprotective effects of PPAR-α and PPAR-γ agonists, and tested the impact of their combination. We concluded that no additional benefits on the functional outcomes might be gained upon their combination.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Fenofibrato/farmacología , PPAR alfa/agonistas , PPAR gamma/agonistas , Pioglitazona/farmacología , Animales , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/patología , Infarto Cerebral/prevención & control , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fenofibrato/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Pioglitazona/administración & dosificación , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Daño por Reperfusión/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA