Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 13(4): 924-936, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864974

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if combining the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM-D) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides complementary prognostic data for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators. BACKGROUND: The SHFM-D is among the most widely used risk stratification models for overall survival in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and CMR provides highly detailed information regarding cardiac structure and function. METHODS: CMR Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) strain imaging was used to generate the circumferential uniformity ratio estimate with singular value decomposition (CURE-SVD) circumferential strain dyssynchrony parameter, and the SHFM-D was determined from clinical parameters. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine adjusted hazard ratios and time-dependent areas under the curve for the primary endpoint of death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device, or appropriate ICD therapies. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 100 patients (65.5 [interquartile range 57.7 to 72.7] years; 29% female), of whom 47% had the primary clinical endpoint and 18% had appropriate ICD therapies during a median follow-up of 5.3 years. CURE-SVD and the SHFM-D were independently associated with the primary endpoint (SHFM-D: hazard ratio: 1.47/SD; 95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 2.03; p = 0.02) (CURE-SVD: hazard ratio: 1.54/SD; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.11; p = 0.009). Furthermore, a favorable prognostic group (Group A, with CURE-SVD <0.60 and SHFM-D <0.70) comprising approximately one-third of the patients had a very low rate of appropriate ICD therapies (1.5% per year) and a greater (90%) 4-year survival compared with Group B (CURE-SVD ≥0.60 or SHFM-D ≥0.70) patients (p = 0.02). CURE-SVD with DENSE had a stronger correlation with CRT response (r = -0.57; p < 0.0001) than CURE-SVD with feature tracking (r = -0.28; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach to risk stratification using CMR DENSE strain imaging and a widely used clinical risk model, the SHFM-D, proved to be effective in this cohort of patients referred for CRT defibrillators. The combined use of CMR and clinical risk models represents a promising and novel paradigm to inform prognosis and device selection in the future.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/prevención & control , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/mortalidad , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...