Lansoprazole for secondary prevention of gastric or duodenal ulcers associated with long-term low-dose aspirin therapy: results of a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, active-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of low-dose lansoprazole has not been established for the prevention of recurrent gastric or duodenal ulcers in those receiving long-term low-dose aspirin (LDA) for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular protection. This study sought to examine the efficacy of low-dose lansoprazole (15 mg once daily) for the secondary prevention of LDA-associated gastric or duodenal ulcers. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole 15 mg daily (n = 226) or gefarnate 50 mg twice daily (n = 235) for 12 months or longer in a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized active-controlled trial, followed by a 6-month follow-up study with open-label lansoprazole treatment. The study utilized 94 sites in Japan and 461 Japanese patients with a history of gastric or duodenal ulcers who required long-term LDA therapy for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the development of gastric or duodenal ulcers. The cumulative incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers on days 91, 181, and 361 from the start of the study was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method as 1.5, 2.1, and 3.7%, respectively, in the lansoprazole group versus 15.2, 24.0, and 31.7%, respectively, in the gefarnate group. The risk of ulcer development was significantly (log-rank test, P < 0.001) lower in the lansoprazole group than in the gefarnate group, with the hazard ratio being 0.099 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.042-0.230). CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole was superior to gefarnate in reducing the risk of gastric or duodenal ulcer recurrence in patients with a definite history of gastric or duodenal ulcers who required long-term LDA therapy.

Detection of right to left shunting through a patent foramen ovale in Japanese patients with ischemic stroke by transesophageal echocardiography using a standardized Valsalva maneuver.

We attempted to clarify the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography performed using a standardized Valsalva maneuver to detect the presence of a patent foramen ovale in Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Four hundred ninety six patients with ischemic stroke who were admitted to the Yokohama City Brain and Stroke Center between September 1999 and February 2002 were enrolled for the study. All the enrolled patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography with contrast injection and color Doppler imaging. During the procedure, a standardized Valsalva maneuver was performed to induce right to left shunting through a patent foramen ovale. Other related structural abnormalities, such as atrial septal aneurysm and the Chiari network anomaly, were also detected by the test. Transesophageal echocardiography without the Valsalva maneuver revealed a functional right to left communication in only 8.2% of the ischemic stroke patients, whereas the procedure conducted using a standardized Valsalva maneuver to provoke shunting revealed a patent foramen ovale in 15.3% of the patients. The presence of an atrial septal aneurysm or the Chiari network anomaly was not sensitive or specific enough to predict the presence of a patent foramen ovale as diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography using the standardized Valsalva maneuver. Our results suggest that the standardized Valsalva maneuver is a safe and useful technique to detect the presence of a patent foramen ovale, which is potentially known to be associated with paradoxical embolism.