Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 141
Filtrar
1.
Transplant Proc ; 51(3): 722-728, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30979456

RESUMEN

TruGraf v1 is a laboratory-developed DNA microarray-based gene expression blood test to enable proactive noninvasive serial assessment of kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. It has been previously validated in patients identified as Transplant eXcellence (TX: stable serum creatinine, normal biopsy results, indicative of immune quiescence), and not-TX (renal dysfunction and/or rejection on biopsy results). TruGraf v1 is intended for use in subjects with stable renal function to measure the immune status as an alternative to invasive, expensive, and risky surveillance biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients from 7 transplant centers to evaluate TruGraf v1. The molecular testing laboratory was blinded to renal function and biopsy results. RESULTS: Overall, TruGraf v1 accuracy (concordance between TruGraf v1 result and clinical and/or histologic assessment) was 74% (142/192), and a result of TX was accurate in 116 of 125 (93%). The negative predictive value for TruGraf v1 was 90%, with a sensitivity 74% and specificity of 73%. Results did not significantly differ in patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis vs those without a biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: TruGraf v1 can potentially support a clinical decision enabling unnecessary surveillance biopsies with high confidence, making it an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patients. TruGraf v1 testing can potentially avoid painful and risky invasive biopsies, reduce health care costs, and enable frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm the presence of immune quiescence in the peripheral blood.


Asunto(s)
Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos/métodos , Adulto , Biopsia , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
Transplant Proc ; 51(3): 729-733, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30979457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: TruGraf v1 is a well-validated DNA microarray-based test that analyzes blood gene expression profiles as an indicator of immune status in kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. METHODS: In this study, investigators assessed clinical utility of the TruGraf test in patient management. In a retrospective study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients at 7 transplant centers, and in a prospective observational study they were performed in 45 subjects at 5 transplant centers. RESULTS: When queried regarding whether or not the TruGraf test result impacted their decision regarding patient management, in 168 of 192 (87.5%) cases the investigator responded affirmatively. The prospective study indicated that TruGraf results supported physicians' decisions on patient management 87% (39/45) of the time, and in 93% of cases physicians indicated that they would use serial TruGraf testing in future patient management. A total of 21 of 39 (54%) reported results confirmed their decision that no intervention was needed, and 17 of 39 (44%) reported that results specifically informed them that a decision not to perform a surveillance biopsy was correct. CONCLUSIONS: TruGraf is the first and only noninvasive test to be evaluated for clinical utility in determining rejection status of patients with stable renal function and shows promise of providing support for clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary surveillance biopsies with a high degree of confidence. TruGraf is an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patient health by avoiding painful and invasive biopsies, reducing health care costs, and enabling frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm immune quiescence.


Asunto(s)
Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos/métodos , Biopsia , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patología Molecular/métodos , Médicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Am J Transplant ; 17(9): 2458-2467, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28510335

RESUMEN

Biomarker profiles of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients could enhance the diagnosis and management of recipients. Our aim was to identify diagnostic proteoform signatures of acute rejection in circulating immune cells, using an emergent "top-down" proteomics methodology. We prepared differentially processed and cryopreserved cell lysates from 26 nonviral liver transplant recipients by molecular weight-based fractionation and analyzed them by mass spectrometry of whole proteins in three steps: (i) Nanocapillary liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry; (ii) database searching to identify and characterize intact proteoforms; (iii) data processing through a hierarchical linear model matching the study design to quantify proteoform fold changes in patients with rejection versus normal liver function versus acute dysfunction without rejection. Differentially expressed proteoforms were seen in patients with rejection versus normal and nonspecific controls, most evidently in the cell preparations stored in traditional serum-rich media. Mapping analysis of these proteins back to genes through gene ontology and pathway analysis tools revealed multiple signaling pathways, including inflammation mediated by cytokines and chemokines. Larger studies are needed to validate these novel rejection signatures and test their predictive value for use in clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Proteoma/análisis , Bases de Datos de Proteínas , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Isoformas de Proteínas , Proteómica
5.
Am J Transplant ; 17(8): 2103-2116, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188669

RESUMEN

We performed orthogonal technology comparisons of concurrent peripheral blood and biopsy tissue samples from 69 kidney transplant recipients who underwent comprehensive algorithm-driven clinical phenotyping. The sample cohort included patients with normal protocol biopsies and stable transplant (sTx) function (n = 25), subclinical acute rejection (subAR, n = 23), and clinical acute rejection (cAR, n = 21). Comparisons between microarray and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) signatures were performed and demonstrated a strong correlation between the blood and tissue compartments for both technology platforms. A number of shared differentially expressed genes and pathways between subAR and cAR in both platforms strongly suggest that these two clinical phenotypes form a continuum of alloimmune activation. SubAR is associated with fewer or less expressed genes than cAR in blood, whereas in biopsy tissues, this clinical phenotype demonstrates a more robust molecular signature for both platforms. The discovery work done in this study confirms a clear ability to detect gene expression profiles for sTx, subAR, and cAR in both blood and biopsy tissue, yielding equivalent predictive performance that is agnostic to both technology and platform. Our data also provide strong biological insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying these signatures, underscoring their logistical potential as molecular diagnostics to improve clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
6.
Am J Transplant ; 17(9): 2410-2419, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28226199

RESUMEN

Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD Na) score is now used for liver transplant allocation in the United States, mortality prediction may be underestimated by the score. Using aggregated electronic health record data from 7834 adult patients with cirrhosis, we determined whether the cause of cirrhosis or cirrhosis complications was associated with an increased risk of death among patients with a MELD Na score ≤15 and whether patients with the greatest risk of death could benefit from liver transplantation (LT). Over median follow-up of 2.3 years, 3715 patients had a maximum MELD Na score ≤15. Overall, 3.4% were waitlisted for LT. Severe hypoalbuminemia, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax conferred the greatest risk of death independent of MELD Na score with 1-year predicted mortality >14%. Approximately 10% possessed these risk factors. Of these high-risk patients, only 4% were waitlisted for LT, despite no difference in nonliver comorbidities between waitlisted patients and those not listed. In addition, risk factors for death among waitlisted patients were the same as those for patients not waitlisted, although the effect of malnutrition was significantly greater for waitlisted patients (hazard ratio 8.65 [95% CI 2.57-29.11] vs. 1.47 [95% CI 1.08-1.98]). Using the MELD Na score for allocation may continue to limit access to LT.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Modelos Estadísticos , Asignación de Recursos , Listas de Espera/mortalidad , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sodio/sangre , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Estados Unidos
7.
Am J Transplant ; 17(3): 712-723, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597148

RESUMEN

An unbalanced microbiome may lead to disease by creating aberrant immune responses. A recent association of cellular rejection with the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) suggests the role of immune-mediated tissue injury. We hypothesized that developing IFTA correlates with altered urinary tract microbiomes (UMBs). UMBs at two serial time points, 1 and 6-8 months posttransplant, were assessed by 16S microbial ribosomal gene sequencing in 25 patients developing biopsy-proven IFTA compared to 23 transplant patients with normal biopsies and excellent function (TX) and 20 healthy nontransplant controls (HC). Streptococcus, the dominant genera in HC males, was lower in IFTA and TX males at 1 month compared to HCs. At 6-8 months, Streptococcus was further decreased in IFTA males, but normalized in TX. IFTA males and females had increases in number of genera per sample at 6-8 months. UMB composition varied substantially between individuals in all groups. Despite the wide variation in UMBs between individuals, IFTA was associated with a loss in dominant resident urinary microbes in males, and a parallel increase in nonresident, pathogenic bacteria in males and females. UMB changes may contribute to IFTA development by alteration of the host immune response.


Asunto(s)
Atrofia/orina , Biomarcadores/orina , Fibrosis/orina , Rechazo de Injerto/orina , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Túbulos Renales/patología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/orina , Microbiota/genética , Atrofia/etiología , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Fibrosis/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Túbulos Renales/metabolismo , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 51(7): 906-12, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27183098

RESUMEN

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, also known as veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD), is a potentially life threatening complication that can develop after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Although SOS/VOD progressively resolves within a few weeks in most patients, the most severe forms result in multi-organ dysfunction and are associated with a high mortality rate (>80%). Therefore, careful attention must be paid to allow an early detection of SOS/VOD, particularly as drugs have now proven to be effective and licensed for its treatment. Unfortunately, current criteria lack sensitivity and specificity, making early identification and severity assessment of SOS/VOD difficult. The aim of this work is to propose a new definition for diagnosis, and a severity-grading system for SOS/VOD in adult patients, on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Diagnóstico Precoz , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/etiología , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Am J Transplant ; 16(7): 1982-98, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990570

RESUMEN

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.


Asunto(s)
Atrofia/mortalidad , Fibrosis/mortalidad , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Túbulos Renales/patología , Nefritis Intersticial/mortalidad , Atrofia/genética , Fibrosis/genética , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Túbulos Renales/metabolismo , Nefritis Intersticial/genética , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
10.
Am J Transplant ; 16(9): 2684-94, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26946333

RESUMEN

Assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after liver transplantation (LT) has been limited by the lack of a multicenter study with detailed clinical information. An integrated database linking information from the University HealthSystem Consortium and the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network was analyzed using multivariate Poisson regression to assess factors associated with 30- and 90-day MACE after LT (February 2002 to December 2012). MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, and/or stroke. Of 32 810 recipients, MACE hospitalizations occurred in 8% and 11% of patients at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Recipients with MACE were older and more likely to have a history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), alcoholic cirrhosis, MI, HF, stroke, AF and pulmonary and chronic renal disease than those without MACE. In multivariable analysis, age >65 years (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.8-4.4), alcoholic cirrhosis (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2), NASH (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4), pre-LT creatinine (IRR 1.1, 95% CI 1.04-1.2), baseline AF (IRR 6.9, 95% CI 5.0-9.6) and stroke (IRR 6.3, 95% CI 1.6-25.4) were independently associated with MACE. MACE was associated with lower 1-year survival after LT (79% vs. 88%, p < 0.0001). In a national database, MACE occurred in 11% of LT recipients and had a negative impact on survival. Pre-LT AF and stroke substantially increase the risk of MACE, highlighting potentially high-risk LT candidates.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/patología , Humanos , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
11.
Am J Transplant ; 16(8): 2437-44, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26896194

RESUMEN

With less ischemia, improved donor selection and controlled procedures, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) might lead to less HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation or fewer adverse outcomes than deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Using the multicenter A2ALL (Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study) biorepository, we compared the incidence and outcomes of preformed and de novo DSAs between LDLT and DDLT. In total, 129 LDLT and 66 DDLT recipients were identified as having serial samples. The prevalence of preformed and de novo DSAs was not different between DDLT and LDLT recipients (p = 0.93). There was no association between patient survival and the timing (preformed vs. de novo), class (I vs. II) and relative levels of DSA between the groups; however, preformed DSA was associated with higher graft failure only in DDLT recipients (p = 0.01). De novo DSA was associated with graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.005) but with rejection only in DDLT (p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, DSA was an independent risk factor for graft failure regardless of liver transplant type (p = 0.017, preformed; p = 0.002, de novo). In conclusion, although similar in prevalence, DSA may have more impact in DDLT than LDLT recipients. Although our findings need further validation, future research should more robustly test the effect of donor type and strategies to mitigate the impact of DSA.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Trasplante de Hígado , Donadores Vivos , Adulto , Cadáver , Chicago/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Receptores de Trasplantes
12.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(2): 166-74, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26803539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to improve patient safety are challenged by the lack of universally agreed upon terms. The International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) was developed by the World Health Organization for this purpose. This study aimed to test the applicability of the ICPS to a surgical population. DESIGN: A web-based safety debriefing was sent to clinicians involved in surgical care of abdominal organ transplant patients. A multidisciplinary team of patient safety experts, surgeons and researchers used the data to develop a system of classification based on the ICPS. Disagreements were reconciled via consensus, and a codebook was developed for future use by researchers. RESULTS: A total of 320 debriefing responses were used for the initial review and codebook development. In total, the 320 debriefing responses contained 227 patient safety incidents (range: 0-7 per debriefing) and 156 contributing factors/hazards (0-5 per response). The most common severity classification was 'reportable circumstance,' followed by 'near miss.' The most common incident types were 'resources/organizational management,' followed by 'medical device/equipment.' Several aspects of surgical care were encompassed by more than one classification, including operating room scheduling, delays in care, trainee-related incidents, interruptions and handoffs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a framework for patient safety can be applied to facilitate the organization and analysis of surgical safety data. Several unique aspects of surgical care require consideration, and by using a standardized framework for describing concepts, research findings can be compared and disseminated across surgical specialties. The codebook is intended for use as a framework for other specialties and institutions.


Asunto(s)
Errores Médicos/clasificación , Seguridad del Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/normas , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/normas , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Modelos Teóricos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
13.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 221-34, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26227106

RESUMEN

We previously described early results of a nonchimeric operational tolerance protocol in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical living donor renal transplants and now update these results. Recipients given alemtuzumab, tacrolimus/MPA with early sirolimus conversion were multiply infused with donor hematopoietic CD34(+) stem cells. Immunosuppression was withdrawn by 24 months. Twelve months later, operational tolerance was confirmed by rejection-free transplant biopsies. Five of the first eight enrollees were initially tolerant 1 year off immunosuppression. Biopsies of three others after total withdrawal showed Banff 1A acute cellular rejection without renal dysfunction. With longer follow-up including 5-year posttransplant biopsies, four of the five tolerant recipients remain without rejection while one developed Banff 1A without renal dysfunction. We now add seven new subjects (two operationally tolerant), and demonstrate time-dependent increases of circulating CD4(+) CD25(+++) CD127(-) FOXP3(+) Tregs versus losses of Tregs in nontolerant subjects (p < 0.001). Gene expression signatures, developed using global RNA expression profiling of sequential whole blood and protocol biopsy samples, were highly associative with operational tolerance as early as 1 year posttransplant. The blood signature was validated by an external Immune Tolerance Network data set. Our approach to nonchimeric operational HLA-identical tolerance reveals association with Treg immunophenotypes and serial gene expression profiles.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/análisis , Antígenos HLA/genética , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Quimera por Trasplante/inmunología , Tolerancia al Trasplante/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Genómica/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Supervivencia de Injerto , Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Quimera por Trasplante/genética
14.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2465-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26137963

RESUMEN

The new national Kidney Allocation System of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), effective as of December 4, 2014, was designed to improve the chances of transplanting the most highly sensitized patients on the waitlist, those with calculated panel reactive antibody values of 98%, 99% and 100%. Recently, it was suggested that these highly sensitized patients will experience inequitable access, given the reported high prevalence of antibodies to HLA-DP, and the fact that only about 1/3 of deceased donors are typed for HLA-DP antigens. Here we report that 320/2948 flow cytometric crossmatches performed for the Northwestern transplant program over the past 28 months were positive solely due to HLA-DP donor-specific antibodies (11%; 16.5% of patients with HLA antibodies-sensitized patients). We further show that 58/207 (12%) HLA-DR serologically matched donor-recipient pairs had a positive B cell flow crossmatch due to donor-specific HLA class II antibodies, and 2/34 (6%) serologic zero-HLA-A-B-DR mismatch had a positive flow crossmatch due to HLA-DSA. We therefore provide information regarding the necessity and importance of complete donor HLA typing including both chains of the HLA-DP antigen (encoded by HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1) at the time of organ offer.


Asunto(s)
Cadenas alfa de HLA-DP/inmunología , Cadenas beta de HLA-DP/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Trasplante de Órganos , Asignación de Recursos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Asignación de Recursos/normas , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Citometría de Flujo , Histocompatibilidad/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos
15.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(6): 781-9, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25798682

RESUMEN

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome or veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). This review aims to highlight, on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the current knowledge on SOS/VOD pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis and treatments. Our perspectives on SOS/VOD are (i) to accurately identify its risk factors; (ii) to define new criteria for its diagnosis; (iii) to search for SOS/VOD biomarkers and (iv) to propose prospective studies evaluating SOS/VOD prevention and treatment in adults and children.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades Vasculares , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia
17.
Am J Transplant ; 15(1): 64-75, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403742

RESUMEN

The ability to generate patient-specific cells through induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has encouraged development of three-dimensional extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds as bioactive substrates for cell differentiation with the long-range goal of bioengineering organs for transplantation. Perfusion decellularization uses the vasculature to remove resident cells, leaving an intact ECM template wherein new cells grow; however, a rigorous evaluative framework assessing ECM structural and biochemical quality is lacking. To address this, we developed histologic scoring systems to quantify fundamental characteristics of decellularized rodent kidneys: ECM structure (tubules, vessels, glomeruli) and cell removal. We also assessed growth factor retention--indicating matrix biofunctionality. These scoring systems evaluated three strategies developed to decellularize kidneys (1% Triton X-100, 1% Triton X-100/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 0.02% Trypsin-0.05% EGTA/1% Triton X-100). Triton and Triton/SDS preserved renal microarchitecture and retained matrix-bound basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Trypsin caused structural deterioration and growth factor loss. Triton/SDS-decellularized scaffolds maintained 3 h of leak-free blood flow in a rodent transplantation model and supported repopulation with human iPSC-derived endothelial cells and tubular epithelial cells ex vivo. Taken together, we identify an optimal Triton/SDS-based decellularization strategy that produces a biomatrix that may ultimately serve as a rodent model for kidney bioengineering.


Asunto(s)
Endotelio Vascular/citología , Matriz Extracelular/fisiología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/citología , Túbulos Renales/fisiología , Trasplante de Órganos/normas , Ingeniería de Tejidos , Andamios del Tejido , Animales , Diferenciación Celular , Células Cultivadas , Detergentes/farmacología , Humanos , Túbulos Renales/irrigación sanguínea , Túbulos Renales/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Perfusión , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
18.
Am J Transplant ; 14(5): 1164-72, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24725967

RESUMEN

There are no minimally invasive diagnostic metrics for acute kidney transplant rejection (AR), especially in the setting of the common confounding diagnosis, acute dysfunction with no rejection (ADNR). Thus, though kidney transplant biopsies remain the gold standard, they are invasive, have substantial risks, sampling error issues and significant costs and are not suitable for serial monitoring. Global gene expression profiles of 148 peripheral blood samples from transplant patients with excellent function and normal histology (TX; n = 46), AR (n = 63) and ADNR (n = 39), from two independent cohorts were analyzed with DNA microarrays. We applied a new normalization tool, frozen robust multi-array analysis, particularly suitable for clinical diagnostics, multiple prediction tools to discover, refine and validate robust molecular classifiers and we tested a novel one-by-one analysis strategy to model the real clinical application of this test. Multiple three-way classifier tools identified 200 highest value probesets with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve for the validation cohort ranging from 82% to 100%, 76% to 95%, 76% to 95%, 79% to 100%, 84% to 100% and 0.817 to 0.968, respectively. We conclude that peripheral blood gene expression profiling can be used as a minimally invasive tool to accurately reveal TX, AR and ADNR in the setting of acute kidney transplant dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/clasificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/genética , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
20.
Am J Transplant ; 13(5): 1149-58, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23489435

RESUMEN

Health researchers and policy-makers increasingly urge both patient and clinician engagement in shared decision making (SDM) to promote patient-centered care. Although SDM has been examined in numerous clinical settings, it has received little attention in solid organ transplantation. This paper describes the application of SDM to the kidney transplantation context. Several distinctive features of kidney transplantation present challenges to SDM including fragmented patient-provider relationships, the time-sensitive and unpredictable nature of deceased organ offers, decision-making processes by transplant providers serving as both organ guardians (given the organ scarcity) versus advocates for specific patients seeking transplantation, variable clinical practices and policies among transplant centers, and patients' potentially compromised cognitive status and literacy levels. We describe potential barriers to and opportunities for SDM, and posit that SDM is feasible, warranting encouragement in kidney transplantation. We propose strategies to promote and overcome obstacles to SDM in kidney transplantation. We contend that engagement in SDM can be facilitated by re-organization of clinical care, communication and education of providers and patients.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Toma de Decisiones , Trasplante de Riñón , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA