The Effects of Incontinence Pad Application on Loaded Skin With Reference to Biophysical and Biochemical Parameters: An Exploratory Cohort Study Using a Repeated-Measures Design.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal changes in skin responses following exposure to moisture alone or moisture in combination with mechanical loading. DESIGN: Comparison cohort with a repeated-measures design. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: The sample comprised 12 healthy volunteers. Participants were purposely sampled from 2 different age groups; half were 32 to 39 years old and half were 50 to 62 years old. Participants identified as White, Black, or mixed; 83% (n = 10) identified as White; 8 (67%) were female. METHODS: Four sites at the sacrum were challenged with the application of specimens taken from 2 absorbent products; the pad specimens were applied dry or saturated with synthetic urine (SU; pH = 8); a further site from the sacral skin was also selected and used as a control. Skin assessments were performed at different points in time: (1) 60 minutes after exposure to dry or SU-saturated pad specimens; (2) 60 minutes after exposure to pads and mechanical loading (application of pressure in the form of 45°C high sitting); and (3) 30 minutes after removal of all pads (recovery period). Outcome measures were transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, erythema, pH, and skin inflammatory biomarkers measured at each of the time points described earlier. RESULTS: The control site and those exposed to dry pads showed minimal time-dependent changes irrespective of the parameter investigated. In contrast, significant increases in TEWL (P = .0000007) and SC hydration responses (P = .0000007) were detected at the sites under absorbent pad specimens after saturation with SU (exposure to moisture). In some participants, TEWL and SC hydration parameters were significantly higher during pressure application. Skin pH remained in the mildly acidic range throughout the test session, and no consistent trends were observed with erythema. Skin inflammatory biomarkers also exhibited considerable variability across participants; none changed significantly over time. Significant differences (P = .02) were also detected following the exposure of moisture in combination with pressure. CONCLUSION: We evaluated an array of parameters to identify changes following skin exposure to 2 absorbent pads in the presence and absence of SU and mechanical loading. Analysis revealed changes in skin barrier properties in the presence of moisture and/or pressure. This observation suggests a need for frequent pad changing as well as periods of skin off-loading to protect the skin health of individuals with incontinence.

Spatial and temporal changes in biophysical skin parameters over a category I pressure ulcer.

In acute care facilities, the detection of pressure ulcers (PUs) relies on visual and manual examination of the patient's skin, which has been reported to be inconsistent and may lead to misdiagnosis. In skin and wound research, various biophysical parameters have been extensively employed to monitor changes in skin health. Nonetheless, the transition of these measures into care settings as part of a routine clinical assessment has been limited. This study was designed to examine the spatial and temporal changes in skin biophysical parameters over the site of a category I PU, in a cohort of hospitalised patients. Thirty patients, each presenting with a category I PU, were enrolled in the study. Skin integrity was assessed at the PU-compromised site and two adjacent areas (5 and 10 cm away). Data was collected over three sessions to examine both temporal differences and longitudinal changes. Skin integrity was assessed using two biophysical parameters, namely, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum (SC) hydration. In addition, the influence of intrinsic factors, namely, incontinence and mobility status, on the parameters was evaluated. TEWL values at the sites compromised by PU were statistically significantly greater (P < .001) than corresponding values at the adjacent control sites at 5 and 10 cm, which were consistent with a normative range (<20 g/h/m2 ). By contrast, SC hydration values did not reveal clear distinctions between the three sites, with high inter-patient variation detected at the sites. Nevertheless, individual profiles were consistent across the three sessions, and the PU site was observed to be either abnormally dry or overhydrated in different individuals. No consistent temporal trend in either parameter was evident. However, intrinsic factors were shown to influence the parameters, with females, bedridden and incontinent patients presenting significantly higher TEWL and SC hydration values (P < .05). TEWL was able to identify differences in skin responses at skin sites compromised with a category I PU when compared to healthy adjacent skin sites. Accordingly, this parameter could be included in the clinical assessment for the identification of PU risk. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of hydration and skin barrier function in the development of PUs and their ability to monitor temporal changes in skin integrity.

Inflammatory biomarkers in sebum for identifying skin damage in patients with a Stage I pressure ulcer in the pelvic region: A single centre observational, longitudinal cohort study with elderly patients.

Pressure Ulcers (PU) are a major burden for affected patients and healthcare providers. Current detection methods involve visual assessments of the skin by healthcare professionals. This has been shown to be subjective and unreliable, with challenges associated with identifying erythema in darker colour skin. Although there exists a number of promising non-invasive biophysical techniques such as ultrasound, capacitance measurements, and thermography, the present study focuses on directly measuring the changes in the inflammatory status of the skin and underlying tissues. Therefore, in this study, we aim to analyse inflammatory cytokines collected through non-invasive sampling techniques to detect early signs of skin damage. Thirty hospitalised patients presenting with Stage I PU were recruited to evaluate the inflammatory response of skin at the site of damage and an adjacent healthy control site. Sebutapes were collected over three sessions to investigate the temporal changes in the inflammatory response. The panel of cytokines investigated included high-abundance cytokines, namely, IL-1α and IL-1RA, and low abundance cytokines; IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, INF-γ, IL-33, IL-1ß and G-CSF. Spatial and temporal differences between sites were assessed and thresholds were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker. The results suggest significant (P < .05) spatial changes in the inflammatory response, with upregulation of IL-1α, IL-8, and G-CSF as well as down-regulation of IL-1RA over the Stage I PU compared with the adjacent control site. There were no significant temporal differences between the three sessions. Selected cytokines, namely, IL-1α, IL-1RA, IL-8, G-CSF, and the ratio IL-1α/IL-1RA offered clear delineation in the classification of healthy and Stage-I PU skin sites, with receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity. There were limited influences of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the biomarker response. Inflammatory markers provided a high level of discrimination between the sites presenting with Stage I PU and an adjacent healthy skin site, in a cohort of elderly inpatients. Indeed, the ratio of IL-1α to IL-1RA provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, indicative that inflammatory homeostasis is affected at the PU site. There was a marginal influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, demonstrating the localised effects of the inflammation. Further studies are required to investigate the potential of inflammatory cytokines incorporated within Point of Care technologies, to support routine clinical use.

The identification of biophysical parameters which reflect skin status following mechanical and chemical insults.

BACKGROUND: Skin is constantly exposed to mechanical and chemical insults, in the form of prolonged loading, overhydration or exposure to irritants. An array of non-invasive biophysical tools has been adopted to monitor the changes in skin response. The present study aims to identify a set of robust parameters sensitive to mechanical and chemical challenges to skin integrity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven healthy participants were recruited to evaluate the skin response following mechanical loading, tape stripping, overhydration and chemical irritation. Forearm skin responses were recorded at baseline and at three time points following the insult. Measurements included transepidermal water loss, sub-epidermal moisture, erythema and laser Doppler imaging. Thresholds were informed by basal values, and the sensitivity of parameters to detect skin changes was evaluated. RESULTS: High degree of variability in skin response was observed with selected biophysical parameters, such as sub-epidermal moisture, laser Doppler imaging and erythema, even in the absence of an applied insult. Temporal skin response revealed distinct response profiles during each evoked insult. Indeed, the sensitivity of the biophysical parameters was influenced by the threshold values and time point of measurement. Some statistically significant correlations were determined between the biophysical parameters. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that thresholds derived from single biophysical parameters were limited in detecting skin changes following insults. A complementary evaluation using combined parameters has the potential to provide a more sensitive assessment. Further research is required to identify robust biophysical parameters, to aid the early detection of skin damage in clinical settings.

Anatomical variability of sub-epidermal moisture and its clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Technologies have been developed to monitor changes in dermal oedema, indicative of the early signs of pressure ulcers. However, there is limited information on the effects of regional differences in tissue morphology on these sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) parameters. This study was designed to investigate the absolute SEM readings across different anatomical sites using a commercial device. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants were recruited to evaluate basal SEM values at different bony prominences, sampled by an experienced operator. RESULTS: Distinct differences were observed in unloaded SEM values across different anatomical sites, notably between the upper and lower extremities. A high degree of variability was observed in particular sites, such as the heels. Moreover, SEM values at certain locations revealed significant relationships with age, BMI and gender (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed a high level of variability between and within anatomical sites in a healthy cohort of participants. Determining the changes in local skin and sub-dermal tissue status using SEM may require consideration of both site specific and individual demographic factors, with further research needed in cohorts at risk of pressure ulcers.