Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the geriatric population: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients, prone to adverse events (AEs) and low compliance with drugs, may benefit from minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and procedural characteristics of MISTs in geriatric patients with BPH. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant articles through October 1, 2023. Eligible studies focused on geriatric patients (≥65 years) with BPH who were treated with MISTs and evaluated follow-up surgical, micturition, and/or sexual outcomes. Studies were included if there was separate reporting for age subgroups ≥65 years, or if the mean age minus standard deviation was ≥65 years, or if the first quartile was ≥65 years. RESULTS: Out of 292 screened studies, 32 (N = 3972 patients) met inclusion criteria and assessed prostatic artery embolization (PAE), Rezum, GreenLight, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP), and Aquablation. Except for Rezum, all MISTs required a planned overnight stay. While PAE and Rezum could be performed under local anesthesia, the other MISTs needed general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative catheterization duration was longest for PAE (median 14 days) and Rezum (21 days) and shortest for GreenLight (1.9 days). At 12 months postoperatively, all MISTs exhibited significant percent changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (median -69.9%) and quality of life (median -72.5%). Clavien-Dindo Grade 1 AEs ranged widely, with PAE (5.8%-36.8%), Rezum (0%-62.1%), and GreenLight (0%-67.6%) having the largest range, and HoLEP (0%-9.5%), ThuLEP (2%-6.9%), and DiLEP (5%-17.5%) having the smallest. PAE, Rezum, DiLEP, and Aquablation reported no significant changes in the International Index of Erectile Function. CONCLUSIONS: Although all the MISTs reviewed in this study effectively treat BPH in geriatric patients, differences in procedural characteristics and safety profiles across MISTs were considerable. Physicians should use shared decision-making processes, considering risks and patient characteristics, when choosing a suitable treatment option for their patients.

Extensive Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) After the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine without Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) in a Healthy Woman.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is an acute respiratory disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was discovered in 2019. The high transmission and seriousness of COVID-19 necessitated the development of an effective vaccine to control spread of the disease. Multiple vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, namely, the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna (mRNA), and the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (vector) vaccines. As these novel vaccines have been used, adverse effects have been reported, ranging from mild myalgia to severe anaphylaxis and thrombotic events. Thrombotic consequences raised suspicion for the development of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), which is a severe condition associated with occlusion of venous sinuses and disruption of the venous system flow. CASE REPORT A 28-year-old healthy woman presented with a 2-week history of persistent and progressive headache 4 days after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Cerebral computed tomography (CT) and CT venography confirmed the presence of extensive thrombus involving the left transverse and sigmoid sinus as well as the internal jugular vein. Furthermore, other than recent the COVID-19 vaccination, there were no precipitant risk factors in her clinical history or in the detailed laboratory work-up. CONCLUSIONS Headache associated with red flags following administration of any COVID-19 vaccine should prompt urgent neuroimaging to rule out secondary causes and determine the appropriate management. Our patient lacked the typical profile of CVST commonly seen following administration of the Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine. The findings of low platelet count may indicate the peculiar pathophysiology of a thrombotic event associated with with the Pfizer vaccine.

Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer in relation to age, histological grade, size of lesion and lymph node involvement.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy of women in Kashmir. This study was conducted with the objective of assessing hormone receptor positivity and its correlation with age at diagnosis, tumor size, histological grade and lymph node metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 132 newly diagnosed cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, JandK, were included after excluding biopsies, in-situ lesions and recurrence cases. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 48.2 years, 59.1% being ≤ 50 years of age. Mean duration of symptoms was 6.32 months. Most lesions (65.1%) were 2-5 cm and 16.7% were ≥ 5.0 cm in greatest dimension. The predominant (80.3%) morphology was IDC-NOS. The majority of the cases presented as grade II (52.1%) lesions and lymph node involvement was present in 65.2%. ER and PR were positive in 66.3% and 63.4% cases, respectively, increasing with rising age. High grade lesions and larger size tumors were more likely to be ER and PR negative. No correlation was found between ER/PR status and lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: ER and PR expression in breast cancers in the current study was found to be higher than studies done in India/Asia but lower than studies conducted in the West, even on Indian/Asian immigrants. Markedly lower receptor expression in Indian/Asian studies is likely due to preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer are strongly advocated for standardization of receptor evaluation and for clinical management of breast cancer patients to provide best therapeutic options.