Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Rev Med Interne ; 41(2): 111-117, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889564

RESUMEN

Tuberculosis is a human disease caused by Mycobacteriumtuberculosis, and transmitted by airborne pathway. Documented cases of tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers have been reported in both developed and developing countries. Early recognition of potentially infectious cases, immediate implementation of airborne precautions and prompt medical treatment of cases, are required to lower the risk of disease transmission. Molecular biology techniques allow earlier diagnosis. In the event of non-compliance with airborne precautions, the investigation will further have to establish exhaustive lists of potentially exposed healthcare workers and patients, looking for cases of latent tuberculosis infections whose treatment should help avoid active tuberculosis disease.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud , Control de Infecciones , Exposición Profesional , Tuberculosis , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/normas , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/normas , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Tuberculosis/transmisión
2.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(4): 361-367, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375373

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To conduct an audit of vaccination practices against pertussis in maternity wards to assess immunization practices targeting women, knowledge and awareness among health professionals and their involvement in the vaccination process, and to estimate their vaccine coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2017 cross-sectional descriptive survey using a data collection sheet of immunization practices targeting women and an anonymous questionnaire for health professionals whose vaccine coverage had been documented by the occupational health service. RESULTS: Five public maternity wards participated: one had a vaccination policy for women; 426 of 822 health professionals completed the questionnaire, 76% (from 50% of all residents to 83% of nurses) declared their vaccination status as up to date. Staff files in occupational health services showed that 69% of 822 health professionals received at least one vaccine booster during adulthood (57% less than 10 years before the survey); documented vaccination coverage rates ranged from 75% for residents to 91% for senior physicians. Occupational physicians and family physicians respectively performed 41% and 34% of vaccinations. While knowledge regarding vaccines was good, only 47% of health professionals declared prescribing them and 18% declared administering the anti-pertussis vaccine "often" or "very often". CONCLUSIONS: Updated data is needed to confirm the reported increase as participating centers are not representative of all birth centers. The active role of health professionals in vaccination-based pertussis prevention needs to be reinforced.


Asunto(s)
Maternidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Embarazo , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Personal de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina del Trabajo , Paris/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 67(1): 58-60, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) are considered to be at higher risk of tuberculosis (TB) than the general population. However, a decreasing incidence in the general population as well as improvement in preventive measures in hospitals has reduced the risk for HCWs. AIMS: To quantify the actual incidence of TB in nurses and health care assistants in a low-incidence country. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 80 hospitals throughout France, employing 233389 health care staff (physicians excluded). We calculated the number of pulmonary TB cases over 3 years (700166 person-years) and the total number of staff members in each job category (nurses, health care assistants, administrative staff) in each hospital, to calculate the incidence. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence rate varied between 1.27 and 6/100000 for administrative staff and nurses, respectively (non-significant difference). The incidence varied according to the geographical area. However, the incidence in nurses and health care assistants was not different from the general population (7.5/100000). CONCLUSIONS: In a low-incidence country, such as France, the implementation of measures to prevent occupational TB among HCWs has been effective. These preventive measures should be maintained but medical follow-up could be revised.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tuberculosis/epidemiología
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(8): 963-8, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25896252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the temporal trend of reported occupational blood and body fluid exposures (BBFE) in French healthcare facilities. METHOD: Retrospective follow-up of reported BBFE in French healthcare facilities on a voluntary basis from 2003 to 2012 with a focus on those enrolled every year from 2008 to 2012 (stable cohort 2008-12). FINDINGS: Reported BBFE incidence rate per 100 beds decreased from 7.5% in 2003 to 6.3% in 2012 (minus 16%). Percutaneous injuries were the most frequent reported BBFE (84.0% in 2003 and 79.1% in 2012). Compliance with glove use (59.1% in 2003 to 67.0% in 2012) and sharps-disposal container accessibility (68.1% in 2003 to 73.4% in 2012) have both increased. A significant drop in preventable BBFE was observed (48.3% in 2003 to 30.9% in 2012). Finally, the use of safety-engineered devices increased from 2008 to 2012. CONCLUSION: Of the 415,209 hospital beds in France, 26,158 BBFE could have occurred in France in 2012, compared with 35,364 BBFE in 2003. Healthcare personnel safety has been sharply improved during the past 10 years in France.


Asunto(s)
Sangre , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Equipos de Seguridad , Diseño de Equipo , Francia/epidemiología , Guantes Protectores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/prevención & control , Asistentes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Jeringas
7.
Med Mal Infect ; 42(6): 264-9, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22683102

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors had for objective to evaluate the air-tightness of FFP2 respirator masks used by healthcare workers, with a quantitative fit-test protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This test measures the number of ambient particles inside and outside the respirator mask. The ratio between both is called fit-factor. The fit-test is successful for an FFP2 respirator mask when the fit-factor is equal or superior to 100. The tests were performed in three hospitals. Nine types of FFP2 respirator masks were fit-tested, classified in three groups: hard shell, duckbill, and flat-fold respirator masks. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty fit-tests were performed. Less than a third of the fit-tests were successful (35/130). The rate of successful tests was higher with flat-fold (57.5%, 23/40) than with duckbill (18.3%, 11/60), or hard shell respirator masks (3.3%, 1/30), (P<0.05). Zero to 60% of healthcare workers had a successful fit-test with the respirator masks used in each hospital. This percentage increased with the number of tested respirator masks. No 100% success rate was ever reached in any hospital with the three tested respirator masks. CONCLUSION: Duckbill, and flat-fold respirator masks seem to be better adapted for healthcare workers than hard shell respirator masks. It seems necessary to implement new recommendations for respiratory protection in France. At least two types of respirator masks with various sizes and shape should be available and fitting controls should be performed with respirator masks that are worn by healthcare workers exposed to infectious risks.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Diseño de Equipo , Francia , Humanos
8.
J Clin Virol ; 52(1): 4-10, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21680238

RESUMEN

Three pathogens account for most cases of occupationally acquired blood-borne infection: hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The highest proportion of occupational transmission is due to percutaneous injury (PI) via hollow-bore needles with vascular access. We briefly review prevention and management of blood-borne pathogens in health care workers (HCWs) in developed countries. HCW compliance with standard precautions is necessary for prevention of PI. Safety-engineered devices are now being increasingly promoted as an approach to decreasing the rate of PI. Prevention of HBV transmission requires HCW immunization through vaccination against HBV. In non-vaccinated HCWs (or HCWs with an unknown antibody response to vaccination) exposed to an HbsAg-positive or an untested source patient, post-exposure prophylaxis with HBV vaccine, hepatitis B immunoglobulin or both must be started as soon as possible. Although no available prophylaxis exists for HCV, it is crucial to identify HCV exposure and infection in health care settings and to consequently propose early treatment when transmission occurs. Following occupational exposure with potential for HIV transmission, use of antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis must be evaluated. Patients need to be protected from blood-borne pathogen-infected HCWs, and especially surgeons performing exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) with risk of transmission to the patient. However, HCWs not performing EPPs should be protected from arbitrary administrative decisions that would restrict their practice rights. Finally, it must be emphasized that occupational blood exposure is of great concern in developing countries, with higher risk of exposure to blood-borne viruses because of a higher prevalence of the latter than in developed countries, re-use of needles and syringes and greater risk of sustaining PI, since injection routes are more frequently used for drug administration than in developed countries.


Asunto(s)
Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/virología , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
9.
Med Mal Infect ; 40(9): 524-9, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20430555

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The regional centre for infection control in northern France (CCLIN Nord) has received 28 notifications of pulmonary tuberculosis cases (PTC) in healthcare workers (HCWs), in 30 healthcare institutions, since the implementation of the French notification system for nosocomial infections. METHOD: A descriptive analysis of PTC investigations in healthcare workers was performed over a five-year period using a standardized form. RESULTS: Smear and culture of bronchial samples were positive for 22 PTC and 15 presented radiological cavities. Overall, 7730 contact patients were selected (91.6 % informed) and 4000 healthcare workers (100 % informed). Eighteen percent of adult contact patients, 75 % of children and 50 % of HCWs were investigated. Latent infection was identified in 34 HCWs, 80 adult patients, and ten children. A prophylactic treatment was prescribed for 692 newborns. Tuberculous disease was identified in one adult patient and two HCWs. CONCLUSION: Few cases of tuberculosis infection or disease were diagnosed around HCWs presenting with contagious tuberculosis. The effectiveness of broad information campaigns on exposed HCWs remains hard to assess because of the complexity of tuberculosis infection diagnosis, the high number of lost to follow-up, and the lack of adequate targeting. The role of health care management and occupational medicine remains crucial.


Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino
10.
Gut ; 58(1): 105-10, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18824553

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the costs and cost-effectiveness (C/E) of early hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA testing (alternative-US recommendations) after occupational exposure to HCV with existing follow-up strategies: (1) French, anti-HCV antibodies and alanine transaminase (ALT) activity at months 1, 3 and 6; (2) European, monthly ALT activity for 4 months and anti-HCV antibodies at month 6; (3) and baseline-US, anti-HCV antibodies and ALT activity at month 6. METHODS: A decision tree simulated each strategy for 7300 healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to HCV each year in France, taking into account the impact of early diagnosis on the response to antiviral treatment and the deterioration of HCW quality of life after exposure. RESULTS: For a HCV transmission risk of 0.5% after exposure, the French strategy led to the highest costs/person (181.40 euros) and the baseline-US strategy to the lowest (126.60 euros) (178.50 euros) for alternative-US). The shortest mean time to HCV infection diagnosis (1 month) and the lowest number of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients (1.9/7300 HCWs exposed) was obtained with the alternative-US strategy (vs 6 months and 7.9 CHC, respectively with baseline-US). Compared with the alternative-US, the French strategy was associated with higher costs and lower utilities, and the European with a higher incremental C/E ratio. Compared with the baseline-US strategy, the alternative-US strategy C/E ratio was 2020 euros per quality-adjusted life year saved. CONCLUSION: In HCWs exposed to HCV, a strategy based on early HCV RNA testing shortens the period during which the HCW's wait for his HCV status, leads to lower risk of progression to CHC and is reasonably cost-effective.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/economía , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/economía , Enfermedad Aguda , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diagnóstico Precoz , Europa (Continente) , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Enfermedades Profesionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , ARN Viral/sangre , Estados Unidos
11.
Med Mal Infect ; 38(8): 452-6, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18778904

RESUMEN

Two different types of filtering respiratory masks are available in healthcare settings. The first ones are used to protect patients from droplets coming from the mouth of healthcare workers (HCW) and the second ones are protective masks. For the moment, we lack information regarding application of Ministry of Health recommendations and on adherence of HCW to mask use. Geres, the HCW exposure risk study group, and the INRS, are now conducting a survey in several hospitals in France to evaluate the use of respiratory masks in healthcare settings. Two phases are planned. Phase I is a self survey using a questionnaire for occupational doctors and hygienists and phase II includes three steps on HCW behavior: evaluation of knowledge and practice concerning respiratory masks, evaluation of respiratory mask use, evaluation of wear and fit test in a context of airborne isolation with a FFP1 and FFP2 respiratory mask. Phase I is finished and phase II is beginning. The first phase I data show that the Ministry's recommendations are observed: respiratory masks are available, written recommendations are present; information and training are organized for healthcare workers. Phase II results are not available yet.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Máscaras/normas , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/normas , Enfermedades Respiratorias/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 28(10): 1196-201, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17828699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence rate of reported occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers (HCWs). DESIGN: Prospective national follow-up of HCWs from January 1 to December 31, 2004. SETTING: University hospitals, hospitals, clinics, local medical centers, and specialized psychiatric centers were included in the study on a voluntary basis. PARTICIPANTS: At participating medical centers, every reported blood and body fluid exposure was documented by the occupational practitioner in charge of the exposed HCW by use of an anonymous, standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 375 medical centers (15% of French medical centers, accounting for 29% of hospital beds) reported 13,041 blood and body fluid exposures; of these, 9,396 (72.0%) were needlestick injuries. Blood and body fluid exposures were avoidable in 39.1% of cases (5,091 of 13,020), and 52.2% of percutaneous injuries (4,986 of 9,552) were avoidable (5.9% due to needle recapping). Of 10,656 percutaneous injuries, 22.6% occurred during an injection, 17.9% during blood sampling, and 16.6% during surgery. Of 2,065 splashes, 22.6% occurred during nursing activities, 19.1% during surgery, 14.1% during placement or removal of an intravenous line, and 12.0% during manipulation of a tracheotomy tube. The incidence rates of exposures were 8.9 per 100 hospital beds (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-9.0 exposures), 2.2 per 100 full-time-equivalent physicians (95% CI, 2.4-2.6 exposures), and 7.0 per 100 full-time-equivalent nurses (95% CI, 6.8-7.2 exposures). Human immunodeficiency virus serological status was unknown for 2,789 (21.4%) of 13,041 patients who were the source of the blood and body fluid exposures. CONCLUSION: National surveillance networks for blood and body fluid exposures help to better document their characteristics and risk factors and can enhance prevention at participating medical centers.


Asunto(s)
Sangre , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de Guardia
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 28(1): 18-23, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17230383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety-engineered devices (SEDs) with respect to their effectiveness in preventing needlestick injuries (NSIs) in healthcare settings and their importance among other preventive measures. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective survey with a 1-year follow-up period during which all incident NSIs and their circumstances were reported. Data were prospectively collected during a 12-month period from April 1999 through March 2000. The procedures for which the risk of NSI was high were also reported 1 week per quarter to estimate procedure-specific NSI rates. Device types were documented. Because SEDs were not in use when a similar survey was conducted in 1990, their impact was also evaluated by comparing findings from the recent and previous surveys. SETTING: A total of 102 medical units from 32 hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,506 nurses in medical or intensive care units. RESULTS: A total of 110 NSIs occurring during at-risk procedures performed by nurses were documented. According to data from the 2000 survey, use of SEDs during phlebotomy procedures was associated with a 74% lower risk (P<.01). The mean NSI rate for all relevant nursing procedures was estimated to be 4.72 cases per 100,000 procedures, for a 75% decrease since 1990 (P<.01); however, the decrease in NSI rates varied considerably according to procedure type. Between 1990 and 2000, decreases in the NSI rates for each procedure were strongly correlated with increases in the frequency of SED use (r=0.88; P<.02). CONCLUSION: In this French hospital network, the use of SEDs was associated with a significantly lower NSI rate and was probably the most important preventive factor.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/prevención & control , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Equipos de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Ingeniería Biomédica , Diseño de Equipo , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral , Gestión de Riesgos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 54 Spec No 1: 1S23-1S31, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17073127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Factors that influence the risk for HCV infection after occupational exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV) have not yet been determined. The objective of this study was to assess potential risk factors for Hepatitis C seroconversion after occupational exposure to HCV. METHODS: We conducted a European matched case-control study from 01/01/1991 through 31/12/ 2002. Cases were Health Care Workers (HCWs) who were HCV seronegative at the time of exposure, sustained a documented exposure to HCV, and present documented HCV seroconversion temporally associated with the exposure. Controls-HCWs had a documented exposure to HCV, were HCV seronegative at the time of exposure, and remained so at least 6 months later. Controls were matched to cases for the center and the time period of the exposure occurrence. RESULTS: 60 cases and 204 controls were included. All cases were exposed to HCV-infected materials through percutaneous injuries. Those for whom information was available (61.6%) were exposed to viremic source patients. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis, in which HCV viral load was not introduced because of missing values, identified needle placed in the source patient's vein or artery (Odds Ratio [OR]=100.1; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=7.3-1365.7), deep injury (OR=155.2; 95%CI=7.1-3417.2), and HCW's gender (M vs. F: OR=3.1; 95%CI=1.0-10.0) as risk factors for HCV infection. In univariate unmatched analysis the risk of HCV transmission was increased 11-fold (C195%=1.1-114.1) in HCWs exposed to sources with a viral load>6 log10 copies/mL when compared to sources with a HCV viral load<4 log10 copies/mL. CONCLUSION: The risk of HCV transmission after percutaneous exposure increases with a larger volume of blood, and, a higher titer of HCV in the source patient's blood. The role of HCW's gender need to be further investigated. The results of this study have important implications for counselling and follow-up of HCWs after exposure.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intervalos de Confianza , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/inmunología , Hepatitis C/virología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , ARN Viral/análisis , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Carga Viral
15.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 35(3): 247-56, 2006 May.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16645558

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Midwives appear to be the health care workers exposed to the highest rates of bloodborne injury. In this paper - based on a national survey - we describe the bloodborne injuries occurring in this profession. MATERIAL AND METHOD: During the year 2003, 241 hospitals took part in a national survey of bloodborne injuries. Employees registered anonymous standardized reports of bloodborne events with the Occupational Medicine Unit. The data were processed by the coordination center for the fight against nosocomial infections (C. CLIN) which is in charge of the national analysis of all the events reported in this database. RESULTS: 169 of the 6973 bloodborne events reported during 2003 (2.4%), were signed by midwives or midwife students. The first three most frequent accidents reported were: ocular projections during childbirth, pricks when repairing episiotomy, pricks or cuts when handling soiled instruments. CONCLUSION: Improving knowledge of risk as well as promotion of protection/prevention measures well adapted to this profession should be helpful in optimizing future attitudes.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Partería , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Empleos en Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Factores de Riesgo
16.
J Hosp Infect ; 63(1): 60-4, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16540200

RESUMEN

Injection pens are used by patients when auto-administering medication (insulin, interferon, apokinon etc.) by the subcutaneous route. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of injection pen use by healthcare workers (HCWs) and the associated risk of needlestick injuries to document and compare injury rates between injection pens and subcutaneous syringes. A one-year retrospective study was conducted in 24 sentinel French public hospitals. All needlestick injuries linked to subcutaneous injection procedures, which were voluntarily reported to occupational medicine departments by HCWs between October 1999 and September 2000, were documented using a standardized questionnaire. Additional data (total number of needlestick injuries reported, number of subcutaneous injection devices purchased) were collected over the same period. A total of 144 needlestick injuries associated with subcutaneous injection were reported. The needlestick injury rate for injection pens was six times the rate for disposable syringes. Needlestick injuries with injection pens accounted for 39% of needlestick injuries linked with subcutaneous injection. In all, 60% of needlestick injuries with injection pens were related to disassembly. Injection pens are associated with needlestick injuries six times more often than syringes. Nevertheless, injection pens have been shown to improve the quality of treatment for patients and may improve treatment observance. This study points to the need for safety-engineered injection pens.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/etiología , Jeringas , Equipos Desechables , Diseño de Equipo , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 41(10): 1423-30, 2005 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16231252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Additional studies are required to identify risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission to health care workers after occupational exposure to HCV. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study in 5 European countries from 1 January 1991 through 31 December 2002. Case patients were health care workers who experienced seroconversion after percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure to HCV. Control subjects were HCV-exposed health care workers who did not experience seroconversion and were matched with case patients for center and period of exposure. RESULTS: Sixty case patients and 204 control subjects were included in the study. All case patients were exposed to HCV-infected fluids through percutaneous injuries. The 37 case patients for whom information was available were exposed to viremic source patients. As risk factors for HCV infection, multivariate analysis identified needle placement in a source patient's vein or artery (odds ratio [OR], 100.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-1365.7), deep injury (OR, 155.2; 95% CI, 7.1-3417.2), and sex of the health care worker (OR for male vs. female, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-10.0). Source patient HCV load was not introduced in the multivariate model. In unmatched univariate analysis, the risk of HCV transmission increased 11-fold for health care workers exposed to source patients with a viral load >6 log(10) copies/mL (95% CI, 1.1-114.1), compared with exposures to source patients with a viral load < or =4 log10 copies/mL. CONCLUSION: In this study, HCV occupational transmission was found to occur after percutaneous exposures. The risk of HCV transmission after percutaneous exposure increased with deep injuries and procedures involving hollow-bore needle placement in the source patient's vein or artery. These results highlight the need for widespread adoption of needlestick-prevention devices in health care settings, together with other preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Med Mal Infect ; 34(12): 551-60, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15603930

RESUMEN

Twenty people died of rabies in France between 1970 and 2003 (compared to 55,000 yearly worldwide), 80% on returning from Africa. Dogs were the contaminating animals in 90% of the cases and children were the most common victims. The last instance of rabies in a native French animal was reported in 1998. However the illegal importation of animals still poses a risk. The disease is transmitted by saliva, even before the appearance of clinical symptoms, through a bite, scratch, or licks of mucous membranes or broken skin. Person-to-person transmission has only been observed in cases of grafts (cornea). The mean incubation time of 1 to 3 months is long enough to allow passive immunization and vaccination. After its onset, the disease presents as encephalitis or a paralytic syndrome the outcome of which is always fatal. Clinical diagnosis may be difficult in the early stages of the disease. If rabies is suspected, the National Reference Centre is responsible for the sampling and proper transportation of these samples so as to ensure assessment results within 5 days. If stringent hygiene rules are complied to, there is no risk of contamination for those in close contact. Vaccination, which is performed in official rabies centers, is only performed after a diagnosis based on laboratory evidence, and solely for exposed persons or those for whom a reliable history cannot be established (children under 6 years). Prevention is based on information. People traveling abroad, particularly to Africa, are warned not to approach unknown animals (especially dogs) nor to try to import them, and are advised to comply with vaccinal recommendations for travelers, particularly for toddlers.


Asunto(s)
Rabia/epidemiología , Adolescente , África , Anciano , Animales , Manejo de Caso , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedades de los Perros/transmisión , Enfermedades de los Perros/virología , Perros/virología , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , India , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Rabia/diagnóstico , Rabia/terapia , Rabia/transmisión , Rabia/veterinaria , Rabia/virología , Vacunas Antirrábicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Antirrábicas/uso terapéutico , Virus de la Rabia/aislamiento & purificación , Saliva/virología , Convulsiones/etiología , Piel/lesiones , Trasplante/efectos adversos , Viaje , Vacunación , Infección de Heridas/virología
20.
J Hepatol ; 30(5): 765-9, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10365799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the annual number of cases of hepatitis C virus transmission from infected patients to uninfected surgeons or nurses due to percutaneous injury during invasive procedures. METHODS: The risk of transmission was estimated using a model involving three probabilities: A, that a health care worker sustains at least one percutaneous injury during a procedure; B, that 1 to 10% of patients are seropositive for hepatitis C virus; and C, that infection by this virus is transmitted to the Health Care Worker after such exposure. Probability A was estimated from the results of 2 French multicentric prospective trials. Probability C was estimated from the results of 9 international prospective studies. A ten-fold decreased risk was assumed for surgeons who wear gloves and use solid-bore suture needles. RESULTS: During a single procedure, the estimated probability of hepatitis C virus transmission from an infected patient to an uninfected surgeon ranged from 4.2x10(-5)% to 4.2x10(-4)%, and from 2.98x10(-6)% to 2.98x10(-5)% to an uninfected nurse. For surgeons, the estimated annual cumulative risk of occupational infection ranged from 0.01% to 0.1% (1 in 10000 to 1 in 1000), and for nurses from 0.0054% to 0.054% (1 in 18700 to 1 in 1900). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2 and 21 surgeons out of a total 20000 are estimated to acquire occupationally-related hepatitis C virus infection, and between 16 and 167 nurses out of a total 300000. These estimates strongly justify introducing preventive measures to protect health care workers from bloodborne infection.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología , Guantes Quirúrgicos , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Agujas , Probabilidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Suturas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...