Impact of sarcopenia on tumor response and survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by trans-arterial (chemo)-embolization.

BACKGROUND: At the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), more than 90% of HCC patients present cirrhosis, a clinical condition often associated to malnutrition. Sarcopenia is an indirect marker of malnutrition assessable on computed tomography (CT). AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with HCC treated by trans-arterial (chemo)-embolization. METHODS: Patients with HCC treated by a first session of trans-arterial (chemo)embolization and an available CT scan before treatment were included. Sarcopenia was assessed using skeletal muscle index at baseline and at the first radiological assessment. Radiological response was recorded after the first session of treatment using mRECIST. RESULTS: Of 225 patients treated by trans-arterial bland embolization (n = 71) or trans-arterial chemoembolization (n = 154) for HCC between 2007 and 2013, Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage was A, B, and C in 27.5%, 55%, and 16.8% of cases, respectively. Sarcopenia was present in 57.7% of the patients. Patients with sarcopenia presented a higher rate of progressive disease (19% vs 8%, P = 0.0236), a shorter progression-free survival (8.3 vs 13.2 mo, P = 0.0035), and a shorter median overall survival (19.4 mo vs 35.5 mo, P = 0.0149) compared with non-sarcopenic patients. Finally, patients whose sarcopenia appeared after first transarterial treatment had the worst prognosis (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is associated with tumor progression and poor survival outcomes after trans-arterial (chemo)-embolization for HCC.

Comparison of Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization and Bland Embolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis.

No definitive conclusion could be reached about the role of chemotherapy in adjunction of embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to compare radiological response, toxicity and long-term outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by trans-arterial bland embolization (TAE) versus trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). We retrospectively included 265 patients with HCC treated by a first session of TACE or TAE in two centers. Clinical and biological features were recorded before the treatment and radiological response was assessed after the first treatment using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. Correlation between the treatment and overall, progression-free and transplantation-free survival was performed after adjustment using a propensity score matching: 86 patients were treated by bland embolization and 179 patients by TACE, including 44 patients with drug-eluting beads and 135 with lipiodol TACE, 89.8% of patients were male with a median age of 65 years old. Cirrhosis was present in 90.9% of patients with a Child Pugh score A in 84% of cases. After adjustment, no difference in the rate of AE, including liver failure, was observed between the two treatments. TACE was associated with a significant increase in complete radiological response (odds ratio (OR) = 8.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-25.4)) but not in the overall response rate (OR = 2.2 (95% CI = 0.8-5.8)). No difference in terms of overall survival (p = 0.3905), progression-free survival (p = 0.4478) and transplantation-free survival (p = 0.9020) was observed between TACE and TAE. TACE was associated with a higher rate of complete radiological response but without any impact on overall radiological response, progression-free survival and overall survival compared to TAE.

Idarubicin vs doxorubicin in transarterial chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence. AIM: To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE (Ida-TACE) against doxorubicin-based TACE (Dox-TACE) in intermediate stage HCC. METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2014, all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened. Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B, a performance status below or equal to 1, and no prior TACE. Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin. Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients. The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria. RESULTS: Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin. There were 93% and 87% of cirrhotic patients and 87% and 70% of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31% and 26% of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7% and 73.3% (P = 0.797) with 41.7% and 40.0% complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups, and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar in both groups, with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35% of Dox-TACE and 43% of Ida-TACEs. CONCLUSION: Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.