Effect of a Daily Collagen Peptide Supplement on Digestive Symptoms in Healthy Women: 2-Phase Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of dietary collagen on managing digestive symptoms is currently lacking in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of this issue, we conducted a 2-phase mixed methods study. METHODS: Phase 1 was a mixed methods design to explore current attitude and practice among consumers and health care practitioners. The findings were used to design an 8-week phase 2 digital study called Gutme! conducted in the United States in healthy female volunteers (BMI>25 kg/m2). Our aim was, first, to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully digital mixed methods study; second, the study explored the effect of an 8-week daily supplementation of 20 g dietary collagen peptide (Peptan) on digestive symptoms. Phase 2 was a prospective, open-label, longitudinal, single-arm study. Participation involved 2 weeks of baseline tracking (digestive symptoms, mood, stool, and lifestyle) using an app, followed by 8 weeks of tracking and taking 20 g collagen peptide supplement split into 2 dosages per day. Participants were required to complete a web-based symptom questionnaire at baseline, week 2, and week 8, as well as participate in 2 scheduled video interviews. RESULTS: Phase 1 revealed that consumer awareness of collagen for digestive health is low (64/204, 31.4%). Among the dietitians prescribing collagen for their patients, the most common dosage was 20 g a day with notable effects after 6 weeks of intake. Within the phase 2 study, of the 40 recruited participants, 14 (35%) completed the full course of supplementation. The findings indicate that 93% (13/14) of those who completed the study experienced a reduction in digestive symptoms, which included bloating. CONCLUSIONS: A mixed methods digital study design is feasible and acceptable for collecting relevant data in a real-life setting. The use of a 20 g daily collagen peptide supplement may reduce bloating and improve mild digestive symptoms in otherwise healthy female adults in the absence of any other dietary or lifestyle interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04245254; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04245254.

Personalised Nutrition Technologies and Innovations: A Cross-National Survey of Registered Dietitians.

BACKGROUND: Commercial technology-enabled personalised nutrition is undergoing rapid growth, yet its uptake in dietetics practice remains low. This survey sought the opinions of dietetics practitioners on personalised nutrition and related technologies to understand the facilitators and barriers to its application in practice. METHOD: A cross-section of registered dietitians were recruited in the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Israel, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, and South Africa. The questionnaire sought their views on the risks of genetics technology, the ethics of genetic testing, the usefulness of new personalised nutrition technologies, entrepreneurism, and the perceived importance of new technologies to dietetics. Validated scales were included to assess personality (Big Five) and self-efficacy (NGSEI). The survey was available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the integration of nutrigenetic testing into practice, and to identify factors associated with the perceived importance of bio-information, and mobile technology to dietetics practice. RESULTS: A total of 323 responses (response rate 19.7%) were analysed. Dietetics practitioners who had integrated personalised nutrition technology into practice perceived technologies to be less risky (p = 0.02), biotechnology to be more important (p < 0.01), and professional skills to be less important (p = 0.04) than those who had not. They were also more likely to see themselves as entrepreneurs (p < 0.01) and to perceive lower risks to be associated with technology (p < 0.01). Practitioners of nutrigenetics were lower on neuroticism (p < 0.01) and higher on self-efficacy (p < 0.01), extraversion (p < 0.01), and agreeableness (p < 0.01). A higher perceived importance of biotechnology to dietetics practice was associated with higher perceived usefulness of omics tests (p < 0.01). Perceived importance of information technology was associated with the perceived importance of biotechnology (p < 0.01). Mobile technology was perceived as important by dietitians with the highest level of education (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For dietitians to practice technology-enabled personalised nutrition, training will be required to enhance self-efficacy, address the risks perceived to be associated with new technologies, and instil an entrepreneurial mindset.

Personalized Nutrition Approach in Food Allergy: Is It Prime Time Yet?

The prevalence of food allergy appears to be steadily increasing in infants and young children. One of the major challenges of modern clinical nutrition is the implementation of individualized nutritional recommendations. The management of food allergy (FA) has seen major changes in recent years. While strict allergen avoidance is still the key treatment principle, it is increasingly clear that the avoidance diet should be tailored according to the patient FA phenotype. Furthermore, new insights into the gut microbiome and immune system explain the rising interest in tolerance induction and immunomodulation by microbiota-targeted dietary intervention. This review article focuses on the nutritional management of IgE mediated food allergy, mainly focusing on different aspects of the avoidance diet. A personalized approach to managing the food allergic individual is becoming more feasible as we are learning more about diagnostic modalities and allergic phenotypes. However, some unmet needs should be addressed to fully attain this goal.