Oversizing lung allografts deteriorates outcomes in patients with pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the only curative treatment for patients with end-stage pulmonary fibrosis. It is still under debate whether over- or undersizing of lung allografts is preferably performed regarding the postoperative outcome. We therefore analyzed our data using predicted total lung capacity to compare size mismatches. METHODS: Patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Three groups were formed, 1 including patients with a donor-recipients pTLC ratio (DRPR) of <1.0 (undersized group), the second with a DRPR of ≥1.0 and <1.1 (size-matched group), and the third group with a DRPR of ≥1.1 (oversized group). Outcomes were evaluated using chi-square test and Kruskall-Wallis test as well as Kaplan-Meier analysis, competing risk analysis, and multivariable analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and May 2023, among the 1501 patients transplanted at our institution, 422 (28%) patients were included, 26 (2%) patients forming the oversized group (median DRPR: 1.14), 101 (7%) patients forming the size-matched group (median DRPR: 1.03), and 296 (20%) patients forming the undersized group (median DRPR: 0.92). Patients from the oversized group had a higher PGD grade 3 rate at 24 (p < 0.001), 48 (p < 0.001), and 72 (p = 0.039) hours after transplantation as well as a higher in-hospital mortality compared to the undersized group (p = 0.033). The long-term survival was also better in the undersized group compared to the oversized group (p = 0.011) and to the size-matched group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Oversizing lung allografts more than 10% deteriorated early postoperative outcomes and long-term survival in patients with pulmonary fibrosis.

Impact of total ischaemic time and disease severity class on graft function after bilateral lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Total ischaemic time (IT) is considered a limiting factor in lung transplantation. In this retrospective study, we investigate effects of IT and disease burden on outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 1298 patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation between January 2010 and May 2022 (follow-up 100%, median 54 months) were included. Pre-transplant diseases' severity (recipient body mass index, recipient age, previous lung transplantation, Tacrolimus immunosuppression, preoperative recipient extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, lung volume reduction) for graft failure was individually calculated and-as IT-categorized. Vice versa adjusted Cox models were calculated. Considering competing risks, we assessed cumulative incidences of airway obstructive complications and chronic lung allograft dysfunction with death as competing risk factors for primary graft dysfunction were assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher disease burden significantly accelerated chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death occurrence (P < 0.001); IT did not. IT-adjusted disease burden strata showed 50% graft survival differences at 11 years after transplantation (range 24-74%), disease burden-adjusted IT strata 18% for all and 6% (54-60%) among those above 7 h. All significant primary graft dysfunction risk factors were diagnoses related, IT was not significantly important and odds ratios did not increase with IT. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual graft survival disadvantage that results from an IT between 7 and at least 11 h is negligible in contrast to frequent recipients' disease-based risk levels.

Lungs From Donors ≥70 Years of Age for Transplantation-Do Long-Term Outcomes Justify Their Use?

Donor shortages have led transplant centers to extend their criteria for lung donors. Accepting lung donors ≥70 years of age has previously shown good short-term outcomes; however, no mid- and long-term outcome data on these extended criteria donors has been published to date. In this study, all patients who underwent lung transplantation between 06/2010 and 12/2019 were included in the analysis, and the outcomes were compared between patients receiving organs from donors <70 years of age and patients transplanted with lungs from donors ≥70 years of age. Among the 1,168 lung-transplanted patients, 62 patients received lungs from donors ≥70 years of age. The recipient age of those receiving older organs was significantly higher, and they were more likely to suffer from obstructive lung disease. Older donors were exposed to significantly shorter periods of mechanical ventilation prior to donation, had higher Horowitz indices, and were less likely to have smoked. The postoperative time on mechanical ventilation, time on ICU, and total hospital stay were comparable. The overall survival as well as CLAD-free survival showed no differences between both groups in the follow-up period. Utilization of lungs from donors ≥70 years of age leads to excellent mid- and long-term results that are similar to organs from younger donors when the organs from older donors are carefully preselected.

Lung transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies: a 9-year single-center experience.

Pretransplant allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) increases the recipient's waiting list time and mortality in lung transplantation. Rather than waiting for crossmatch-negative donors, since 2013, recipients with preformed donor-specific antiHLA antibodies (pfDSA) have been managed with repeated IgA- and IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin (IgGAM) infusions, usually in combination with plasmapheresis before IgGAM and a single dose of antiCD20 antibody. This retrospective study presents our 9-year experience with patients transplanted with pfDSA. Records of patients transplanted between February 2013 and May 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients with pfDSA and those without any de novo donor-specific antiHLA antibodies. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Of the 1,043 patients who had undergone lung transplantation, 758 (72.7%) did not develop any early donor-specific antiHLA antibodies, and 62 (5.9%) patients exhibited pfDSA. Among the 52 (84%) patients who completed treatment, pfDSA was cleared in 38 (73%). In pfDSA vs control patients and at 8-year follow-up, respectively, graft survival (%) was 75 vs 65 (P = .493) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (%) was 63 vs 65 (P = .525). In lung transplantation, crossing the preformed HLA-antibody barrier is safe using a treatment protocol based on IgGAM. Patients with pfDSA have a good 8-year graft survival rate and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, similar to control patients.

Does donor-recipient age mismatch have an influence on outcome after lung transplantation? A single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of organ donors demands transplantation of older lung allografts for recipients between 0 and 50 years. So far, it has not yet been investigated whether donor-recipient age mismatch affects long-term outcome. METHODS: Records of patients aged between 0 and 50 years were retrospectively reviewed. Donor-recipient age mismatch was calculated subtracting recipient age from donor age. Multivariable Cox regression analyses was performed to assess donor-recipient age mismatch regarding the end points' overall patient mortality, mortality conditioned to hospital discharge, biopsy-confirmed rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Furthermore, we performed competing risk analysis to analyse if age mismatch affects biopsy-confirmed rejection and CLAD while death being a competing risk. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2021, out of 1363 patients who underwent lung transplantation at our institution, 409 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Age mismatch ranged between 0 and 56 years. Multivariable analysis revealed that donor-recipient age mismatch does not affect overall patient mortality (P = 0.19), biopsy-confirmed rejection (P = 0.68) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (P = 0.42). There was no difference seen in CLAD (P = 0.166) and biopsy-confirmed rejection (P = 0.944) with the competing risk death (P = 0.765 and P = 0.851; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Age mismatch between recipients and donors of lung allografts does not affect long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.

Lung transplant and severe coronary artery disease: results from a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: The management of severe coronary artery disease at the time of a lung transplant remains a challenge. We analysed the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplant recipients with severe coronary artery disease. METHODS: Records of adult patients who received transplants at our institution between April 2010 and February 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Severe coronary artery disease was defined as coronary stenosis ≥70% (main stem ≥50%) seen on the coronary angiographic scans performed before or at the time of listing. Patient characteristics, perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with and without severe coronary artery disease. RESULTS: Among 896 patients who received lung transplants who had undergone coronary angiography before the transplant, 77 (8.5%) had severe coronary artery disease; the remaining 819 (91.5%) did not. Patients with severe coronary artery disease were older (p < 0.0001), more often male (p < 0.0001) and received transplants more often for pulmonary fibrosis (p = 0.0007). The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 46 (20-76) months. At the Cox multivariable analysis, severe coronary artery disease was not associated with death. Patients with pretransplant percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery concomitant to a transplant had survival equivalent to that of patients without severe coronary artery disease (p = 0.513; p = 0.556). CONCLUSIONS: Severe coronary artery disease was not associated with decreased survival after a lung transplant. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery and pretransplant percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty can be used for revascularization.

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific antibody barriers using a perioperative desensitization protocol.

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific HLA-antibody barriers is associated with impaired short- and long-term survival. Therefore, in recipients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies, waiting for crossmatch-negative donors is standard practice. As an alternative strategy, recipients with preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies have been managed at our institutions with a perioperative desensitization regimen. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing heart transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies to recipients without donor-specific antibodies. Recipients with a positive virtual crossmatch received a perioperative desensitization protocol including tocilizumab intraoperatively, plasma exchange and rituximab followed by a six-month course of IgGAM. Among the 117 heart-transplanted patients, 19 (16%) patients underwent perioperative desensitization, and the remaining 98 (84%) patients did not. Cold ischemic time, posttransplant extracorporeal life support for primary graft dysfunction, and intensive care unit stay time did not differ between groups. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from pulsed steroid therapy for presumed rejection and biopsy-confirmed acute cellular or humoral rejection did not differ between groups. One-year survival amounted to 94.7% in the treated patients and 81.4% in the control group. Therefore, heart transplantation in sensitized recipients undergoing a perioperative desensitization appears safe with comparable postoperative outcomes as patients with a negative crossmatch.

Indications and outcome after lung transplantation in children under 12 years of age: A 16-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Paediatric lung transplantation poses unique management challenges. Experience regarding indications and outcome is scarce, especially in younger children. The primary aim of this study was to investigate outcome after first lung transplantation in children <12 years of age in comparison to adolescents (12-17 years old). METHODS: Records of patients <18 years who underwent first lung transplantation between 01/2005 and 01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and compared between children <12 years old and adolescents. Median (IQR) follow-up was 51 (23-91) months. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients underwent first lung transplantation at our institution, of whom 42 (35.8%) patients were <12 years and 75 (64.2%) ≥12 years old. Compared to adolescents, children were more often transplanted for interstitial lung disease (33.3% vs 12%, p = 0.005) and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (28.6% vs 12%, p = 0.025), and required more often intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (31% vs 14.7%, p = 0.036) and postoperative ECMO support (47.6% vs 13.3%, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, children required longer ventilation times (78 vs 18 hours, p = 0.009) and longer ICU stay (9.5 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) compared to their older counterparts. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (9.5% vs 9.3%, p = 0.999), in-hospital mortality (2.4% vs 6.7%, p = 0.418), graft survival (80% vs 62%, p = 0.479) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (76% vs 59%, p = 0.41) at 8-year follow-up did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation in children under 12 years is challenging due to underlying medical conditions and operative complexity. Nevertheless, outcomes are comparable to those in older children.

Liver-first strategy for a combined lung and liver transplant in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: A combined lung and liver transplant in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is an uncommon procedure. The goal of this study was to compare long-term outcomes between patients with CF who underwent either a combined lung-liver or a lung-only transplant. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of patients with CF who underwent a lung transplant between January 2005 and May 2020. Since 2006, our preference for a combined lung-liver transplant was to transplant the liver first and then the lung. Outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Median follow-up was 53 (23-97) months. RESULTS: During the study period, among 357 patients with CF who underwent a lung transplant, 14 (4%) required a lung-liver transplant whereas 343 (96%) had a lung-only transplant. Lung cold ischaemic time was longer in the lung-liver transplant group, but no patient in this group showed primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after the transplant. Prevalence of anti-human leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies was 7.1% vs 13.7% in the lung-liver versus the lung-only transplant group (P = 0.42). At 5 years, lung graft survival (78% vs 69%) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (79% vs 62%) did not differ between the lung-liver versus the lung-only groups (P = 0.45 and P = 0.55, respectively). Freedom from lung biopsy-confirmed rejection was significantly higher in patients undergoing a lung-liver transplant (91% vs 50%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: A lung-liver transplant did not impair lung graft function. The lower prevalence of donor-specific antibodies and the better freedom from lung biopsy-confirmed rejection suggest tolerogenic effects of the liver graft.

Impact of unilateral diaphragm elevation on postoperative outcomes in bilateral lung transplantation - a retrospective single-center study.

This study evaluated the impact of unilateral diaphragm elevation following bilateral lung transplantation on postoperative course. Patient data for all lung transplantations performed at our institution between 01/2010 and 12/2019 were reviewed. Presence of right or left diaphragm elevation was retrospectively evaluated using serial chest X-rays performed while patients were standing and breathing spontaneously. Right elevation was defined by a > 40 mm difference between right and left diaphragmatic height. Left elevation was present if the left diaphragm was at the same height or higher than the right diaphragm. In total, 1093/1213 (90%) lung transplant recipients were included. Of these, 255 (23%) patients exhibited radiologic evidence of diaphragm elevation (right, 55%; left 45%; permanent, 62%). Postoperative course did not differ between groups. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity and total lung capacity were lower at 1-year follow-up in patients with permanent than in patients with transient or absent diaphragmatic elevation (P = 0.038, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Graft survival did not differ between these groups (P = 0.597). Radiologic evidence of diaphragm elevation was found in 23% of our lung transplant recipients. While lung function tests were worse in patients with permanent elevation, diaphragm elevation did not have any relevant impact on outcomes.

Intraoperative Extracorporeal Circulatory Support in Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for intraoperative cardiopulmonary support in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Patients with pulmonary fibrosis have a higher risk to require it. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the need of intraoperative ECMO use. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis at our institution between January 2010 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used for statistical identification of risk factors. RESULTS: There were 105 patients (34%) who required intraoperative ECMO support (ECMO+ group), and 203 (66%) did not (ECMO- group). Preoperative proof of pulmonary hypertension was identified as a risk factor for intraoperative ECMO support (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-6.5; P < .01). Revealed mean pulmonary arterial pressure values exceeding 50 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance values exceeding 9.4 Wood units were identified as risk factors for the need of intraoperative ECMO use with a prediction probability of 70%. Increased recipient body surface area (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5; P < .01) emerged as a protective factor against intraoperative ECMO (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, P = .71) as well as higher cardiac output (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; P < .01). The postoperative course was more complicated in the ECMO+ group, whereas survival at 5 years did not differ among groups (70% vs 69%, P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary hypertension with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance values predicts the need of intraoperative ECMO in patients receiving lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis. Although the postoperative course was more complicated in the ECMO+ group, long-term survival did not differ significantly.

Long-term outcomes after intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has replaced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation at our institution. In this study, we present our experience using intraoperative ECMO in isolated lung transplantation and evaluate its impact on long-term graft function and survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated lung transplantation with or without ECMO support between January 2010 and June 2019 were evaluated. Patients transplanted using CPB were excluded. Peri-operative and follow-up results from our database and patient charts were analyzed. Follow-up continued until September 1, 2019 (median, 3.34 years). RESULTS: In total, 311 of 1,161 lung transplant recipients (27%) received intraoperative ECMO, with 24 (2%) patients further requiring CPB. None of the remaining 826 (71%) patients required intraoperative cardiopulmonary support. ECMO patients exhibited higher pre-transplant surgical risk profiles and endured more complicated early post-operative courses than those without ECMO (in-hospital mortality, 10.9% vs 2.3%; p < 0.001). Inevitably, this resulted in poorer overall graft survival among ECMO recipients (p = 0.0025). However, correcting for patients surviving to hospital discharge, no difference in survival between groups was observed (5-year survival, 71% vs 72%; p = 0.56). Similarly, freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, biopsy-confirmed cellular rejection, or need for pulsed-steroid therapy did not differ between the groups (p = 0.99, p = 0.78, and p = 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients not requiring cardiopulmonary support, ECMO recipients endured a more complicated peri-operative and early post-operative course. However, among those surviving to hospital discharge, no differences in long-term complications or outcomes were observed.