Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nutr ; 149(12): 2265-2266, 2019 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792544

Asunto(s)
Dieta , Desnutrición , Niño , Humanos
2.
BMJ Glob Health ; 4(2): e001227, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31139441

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) causes substantial child morbidity and mortality, accounting for 4.4% of deaths and 6.0% of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) lost among children under 5 each year. There is growing consensus on the need to provide appropriate treatment of MAM, both to reduce associated morbidity and mortality and to halt its progression to severe acute malnutrition. We estimated health outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of four dietary supplements for MAM treatment in children 6-35 months of age in Mali. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomised MAM treatment trial to describe nutritional outcomes of four dietary supplements for the management of MAM: ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSF; PlumpySup); a specially formulated corn-soy blend (CSB) containing dehulled soybean flour, maize flour, dried skimmed milk, soy oil and a micronutrient pre-mix (CSB++; Super Cereal Plus); Misola, a locally produced, micronutrient-fortified, cereal-legume blend (MI); and locally milled flour (LMF), a mixture of millet, beans, oil and sugar, with a separate micronutrient powder. We used a decision tree model to estimate long-term outcomes and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) comparing the health and economic outcomes of each strategy. RESULTS: Compared to no MAM treatment, MAM treatment with RUSF, CSB++, MI and LMF reduced the risk of death by 15.4%, 12.7%, 11.9% and 10.3%, respectively. The ICER was US$9821 per death averted (2015 USD) and US$347 per DALY averted for RUSF compared with no MAM treatment. CONCLUSION: MAM treatment with RUSF is cost-effective across a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01015950.

3.
J Nutr ; 149(6): 1089-1096, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30968123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) affects 34.1 million children globally. Treatment effectiveness is generally determined by the amount and rate of weight gain. Body composition (BC) assessment provides more detailed information on nutritional stores and the type of tissue accrual than traditional weight measurements alone. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the change in percentage fat mass (%FM) and other BC parameters among young Malian children with MAM according to receipt of 1 of 4 dietary supplements, and recovery status at the end of the 12-wk intervention period. METHODS: BC was assessed using the deuterium oxide dilution method in a subgroup of 286 children aged 6-35 mo who participated in a 12-wk community-based, cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of 4 dietary supplements for the treatment of MAM: 1) lipid-based, ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF); 2) special corn-soy blend "plus plus" (CSB++); 3) locally processed, fortified flour (MI); or 4) locally milled flours plus oil, sugar, and micronutrient powder (LMF). Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to evaluate change in BC parameters by treatment group and recovery status. RESULTS: Mean ± SD %FM at baseline was 28.6% ± 5.32%. Change in %FM did not vary between groups. Children who received RUSF vs. MI gained more (mean; 95% CI) weight (1.43; 1.13, 1.74 kg compared with 0.84; 0.66, 1.03 kg; P = 0.02), FM (0.70; 0.45, 0.96 kg compared with 0.20; 0.05, 0.36 kg; P = 0.01), and weight-for-length z score (1.23; 0.79, 1.54 compared with 0.49; 0.34, 0.71; P = 0.03). Children who recovered from MAM exhibited greater increases in all BC parameters, including %FM, than children who did not recover. CONCLUSIONS: In this study population, children had higher than expected %FM at baseline. There were no differences in %FM change between groups. International BC reference data are needed to assess the utility of BC assessment in community-based management of acute malnutrition programs. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01015950.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/patología , Desnutrición/dietoterapia , Desnutrición/patología , Enfermedad Aguda , Composición Corporal , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Preescolar , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Alimentos Fortificados , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Malí , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aumento de Peso
4.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 101(3): 632-45, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25733649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), defined as weight-for-length z score between -3 and -2 or midupper arm circumference between 11.5 and 12.5 cm, affects ∼33 million children aged <5 y worldwide. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the effects of 4 dietary supplements for the treatment of MAM. DESIGN: Twelve community health centers in rural Mali were randomly assigned to provide to 1264 MAM children aged 6-35 mo one of 4 dietary supplements containing ∼500 kcal/d for 12 wk: 1) ready-to-use, lipid-based supplementary food (RUSF); 2) special corn-soy blend (CSB++); 3) locally processed, fortified flour (Misola); or 4) locally milled flours plus oil, sugar, and micronutrient powder (LMF). RESULTS: In total, 1178 children (93.2%) completed the study. The adjusted mean (95% CI) change in weight (kg) from baseline was greater with RUSF than with the locally processed blends and was intermediate with CSB++ [1.16 (1.08, 1.24) for RUSF, 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) for CSB++, 0.91 (0.82, 0.99) for Misola, and 0.83 (0.74, 0.92) for LMF; P < 0.001]. For length change, RUSF and CSB++ differed significantly from LMF. Sustained recovery rates were higher with RUSF (73%) than with Misola (61%) and LMF (58%), P < 0.0001; CSB++ recovery rates (68%) did not differ from any of the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: RUSF was more effective, but more costly, than other dietary supplements for the treatment of MAM; CSB++ yielded intermediate results. The benefits of treatment should be considered in relation to product costs and availability.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Alimentos Fortificados , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Desnutrición/dietoterapia , Aceites de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Salud Rural , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Estudios Cruzados , Grano Comestible , Fabaceae , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Malí , Desnutrición/fisiopatología , Salud Rural/etnología , Semillas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Aumento de Peso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...