Measuring healthcare experiences among people with intellectual disability: a rapid evidence synthesis of tools and methods.

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) collect essential data for service and system-wide quality improvement and performance monitoring towards value-based care. However, the experiences of people with intellectual disability, who have high healthcare utilisation couple with poorer outcomes, are often omitted from system-wide PREMs and service-wide PREMs data. The use of PREMs instruments for data collection among people with intellectual disability has not been explored. This review aimed to identify and synthesise measurement tools and approaches that have been used to gather patient-reported experience data from people with intellectual disability. METHODS: Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) was employed in which comprehensive search strategies were applied to electronic databases and grey literature. Narrative synthesis was employed with the included articles to address the review aim. RESULTS: A total of 48 documents were included; 26 peer-reviewed journal articles and 22 articles from grey literature. Patient-reported experiences have been gathered from people with intellectual disabilities in relation to specific services or encounters, predominantly using qualitative methods. To date, there is an absence of targeted service- or system-wide surveys. Existing clinic- and condition-specific instruments provide insight for broader application. CONCLUSIONS: Patient experience assessment among people with intellectual disability requires consideration of a) how individuals are identified and approached, b) the content, design and structure of measurement instruments and c) the process by which data are collected and d) how it may be applied to create change. Despite the collection of patient experience data from people with intellectual disability, there is little research available about how this information is later used to support health service improvement. Applying PREMs for quality improvement is critical to realise the improvements to healthcare provision required for people with intellectual disability towards equitable care quality.

The silent threat: investigating sleep disturbances in hospitalized patients.

Sleep disruptions in the hospital setting can have adverse effects on patient safety and well-being, leading to complications like delirium and prolonged recovery. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the factors influencing sleep disturbances in hospital wards, with a comparison of the sleep quality of patients staying in single rooms to those in shared rooms. A mixed-methods approach was used to examine patient-reported sleep quality and sleep disruption factors, in conjunction with objective noise measurements, across seven inpatient wards at an acute tertiary public hospital in Sydney, Australia. The most disruptive factor to sleep in the hospital was noise, ranked as 'very disruptive' by 20% of patients, followed by acute health conditions (11%) and nursing interventions (10%). Patients in shared rooms experienced the most disturbed sleep, with 51% reporting 'poor' or 'very poor' sleep quality. In contrast, only 17% of the patients in single rooms reported the same. Notably, sound levels in shared rooms surpassed 100 dB, highlighting the potential for significant sleep disturbances in shared patient accommodation settings. The results of this study provide a comprehensive overview of the sleep-related challenges faced by patients in hospital, particularly those staying in shared rooms. The insights from this study offer guidance for targeted healthcare improvements to minimize disruptions and enhance the quality of sleep for hospitalized patients.

Closing the care gap: combining enhanced recovery with minimally invasive valve surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with advanced age and frailty require interventions for structural heart disease at an increasing rate. These patients typically experience higher rates of postoperative morbidity, mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay, loss of independence as well as associated increased costs to the healthcare system. Therefore, it is becoming critically important to raise awareness and develop strategies to improve clinical outcomes in the contemporary, high-risk patient population undergoing cardiacprocedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Percutaneous options for structural heart disease have dramatically improved the therapeutic options for some older, frail, high-risk patients; however, others may still require cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive techniques can reduce some of the physiologic burden experienced by patients undergoing surgery and improve recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS Cardiac) is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. It has been shown to improve recovery and patient satisfaction while reducing complications and length of stay. SUMMARY: Combining minimally invasive cardiac surgery with enhanced recovery protocols may result in improved patient outcomes for a patient population at high risk of morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery.

Minimally Invasive Approaches to Mitral Valve Surgery: Where Are We Now? A Narrative Review.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MiMVS) has been increasing in prevalence. This review will focus on the approaches, the clinical outcomes, and patient selection for MiMVS. There are four minimally invasive approaches to the mitral valve: Right mini-thoracotomy, both video-assisted and fully endoscopic, robotic mitral surgery, and transapical, beating heart off-pump neochordal repair. Advantages over conventional surgery include less blood loss and transfusion, improved postoperative mobility, shorter length of stay, less postoperative atrial fibrillation, fewer surgical site infections, and improved cosmesis. This range of minimally invasive techniques will continue to evolve, providing options that are tailored for different patient populations.

Use of perioperative telotristat in a patient with carcinoid heart disease.

Summary: Carcinoid heart disease is a rare complication of carcinoid syndrome, resulting in right-sided valvular heart disease and subsequent heart failure due to long-term exposure to vasoactive substances. The management of this condition is complex, often requiring surgical intervention. Current perioperative regimens entail the use of prophylactic somatostatin analogs to prevent carcinoid crisis; however, regimens vary widely among practitioners and evidence supporting their efficacy in this clinical setting is mixed. This case report describes the perioperative management of a 65-year-old man with carcinoid heart disease requiring tricuspid and pulmonary valve replacement surgery. As an adjunct to somatostatin analog therapy, the novel tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor, telotristat, was initiated preoperatively. This combination resulted in normalization of preoperative urinary 5-HIAA levels. The patient successfully underwent tricuspid and pulmonic valve replacement without evidence of carcinoid crisis. This clinical case is the first published documenting the use of telotristat in the perioperative period in a patient with carcinoid syndrome and carcinoid heart disease and was associated with a good long-term outcome despite the high-risk nature of the case. Learning points: Carcinoid crisis is a life-threatening complication of carcinoid syndrome, resulting in hemodynamic instability, bronchospasm, and arrhythmia. Cardiac surgical patients with carcinoid syndrome present a unique challenge as they are subject to physiologic conditions and medications which can potentiate intraoperative carcinoid crisis. Perioperative management of patients with carcinoid syndrome currently entails the use of prophylactic somatostatin analogs; however, these agents do not prevent carcinoid crisis in all cases. Telotristat, a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, shows promise as an adjunctive therapy to somatostatin analogs to reduce the risk of intraoperative carcinoid crisis.

Approaches for enhancing patient-reported experience measurement with ethnically diverse communities: a rapid evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are used to drive and evaluate unit and organisational-level healthcare improvement, but also at a population level, these measures can be key indicators of healthcare quality. Current evidence indicates that ethnically diverse communities frequently experience poorer care quality and outcomes, with PREMs data required from this population to direct service improvement efforts. This review synthesises evidence of the methods and approaches used to promote participation in PREMs among ethnically diverse populations. METHODS: A rapid evidence appraisal (REA) methodology was utilised to identify the disparate literature on this topic. A search strategy was developed and applied to three major electronic databases in July 2022 (Medline; PsycINFO and CINAHL), in addition to websites of health agencies in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries via grey literature searches. A narrative evidence synthesis was undertaken to address the review question. RESULTS: The review resulted in 97 included studies, comprised 86 articles from electronic database searches and 11 articles from the grey literature. Data extraction and synthesis identified five strategies used in PREM instruments and processes to enhance participation among ethnically diverse communities. Strategies applied sought to better inform communities about PREMs, to create accessible PREMs instruments, to support PREMs completion and to include culturally relevant topics. Several methods were used, predominantly drawing upon bicultural workers, translation, and community outreach to access and support communities at one or more stages of design or administration of PREMs. Limited evidence was available of the effectiveness of the identified methods and strategies. PREMs topics of trust, cultural responsiveness, care navigation and coordination were identified as pertinent to and frequently explored with this population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide a basis for a maturity model that may guide change to increase participation of ethnically diverse communities in PREMs. In the short-medium term, health systems and services must be able to recognise and respond to cultural and linguistic diversity in the population when applying existing PREMs. In the longer-term, by working in collaboration with ethnically diverse communities, systems and services may co-create adapted or novel PREMs that tackle the factors that currently inhibit uptake and completion among ethnically diverse communities.

A rare and unique case: aortic valve replacement in a young adult with a stenotic unicommissural unicuspid aortic valve.

Unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly. There are two forms of UAV, including unicuspid acommissural and unicuspid unicommissural. Definitive management for UAV is surgical intervention, but due to the rarity of UAV, the long-term surgical outcomes as well as overall prognosis are not known. Here, we present the case of a 19-year-old patient who was found to have a UAV prenatally and underwent a mechanical aortic valve replacement through an upper hemi-sternotomy due to elevated aortic stenosis gradients and presence of symptoms.

Partial oral versus full intravenous antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in people who inject drugs: A systematic review.

Background: Prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy may not be optimal for people who inject drugs (PWID) with infective endocarditis (IE) due to unique social and medical needs. The role of partial IV antibiotic therapy with continued oral (PO) antibiotic therapy is unclear. Methods: A systematic review was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. Included studies compared PO to IV antibiotic treatment for IE in PWID. Results: Four studies met eligibility. Observational studies included full IV treatment groups and partial IV, partial PO treatment groups for severe injection-related infections. PWID with IE comprised 41.0%-64.7% of the study populations but outcomes specific to IE were not separately reported. All-cause 90-day readmission rates were comparable between the IV treatment group (27.9%-31.5%) and partial IV, partial PO treatment group (24.8%-32.5%). Ninety-day mortality was non-significantly different between IV treatment (4.9%-10.7%) and partial IV, partial PO treatment groups (2.4%-13.0%). One small randomized clinical trial compared IV oxacillin or vancomycin with gentamicin to PO ciprofloxacin plus rifampin. The cure rates were 91% and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: There is limited evidence comparing IV treatment to partial IV, partial PO antibiotic treatment in PWID with IE. Observational studies suggest that PO antibiotic therapy after initial IV treatment may be equivalent to full IV treatment alone within specific parameters, but randomized trials are needed to inform recommendations. Substantial clinical and social benefits for PWID and advantages for the health care system will result if PO treatment strategies with equal efficacy can be implemented.

Historique: L'antibiothérapie intraveineuse (IV) prolongée n'est peut-être pas optimale chez les utilisateurs de drogues par injection (UDI) atteints d'une endocardite infectieuse (EI) découlant de besoins médicaux et sociaux particuliers. On ne connaît pas clairement le rôle de l'antibiothérapie IV partielle conjuguée à l'antibiothérapie par voie orale (PO). Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse systématique au moyen des bases de données EMBASE et MEDLINE. Les études incluses comparaient l'antibiothérapie PO à l'antibiothérapie IV en cas d'EI chez les UDI. Résultats: Quatre études respectaient les critères d'admissibilité. Les études observationnelles incluaient des groupes de traitement IV complets et des groupes de traitements IV et PO partiels en raison de de graves infections liées aux injections. Les UDI atteints d'une IE formaient de 41,0 % à 64,7 % de la population à l'étude, mais les résultats cliniques propres à l'IE n'étaient pas déclarés séparément. Les taux de réadmission toutes causes confondues au bout de 90 jours étaient comparables entre le groupe de traitement IV (27,9 % à 31,5 %) et le groupe de traitement IV et PO partiel (24,8 % à 32,5 %). La mortalité au bout de 90 jours n'était pas sensiblement différente entre le groupe de traitement IV (4,9 % à 10,7 %) et le groupe de traitement IV et PO partiel (2,4 % à 13,0 %). Une petite étude clinique randomisée a comparé l'oxacilline ou la gentamicine IV à la ciprofloxacine conjuguée à la rifampine PO. Les taux de guérison actuels s'élevaient à 91 % et à 90 %, respectivement. Conclusion: Les données probantes sur la comparaison entre l'antibiothérapie IV et l'antibiothérapie IV et PO partielle sont limitées chez les UDI ayant une IE. Selon les études observationnelles, l'antibiothérapie PO après un traitement IV initial pourrait équivaloir à un traitement IV complet unique selon des paramètres précis, mais des études randomisées s'imposent pour étayer les recommandations. Les UDI tireront des avantages cliniques et sociaux importants s'il est possible d'adopter des stratégies de traitement PO de même efficacité, et le système de santé en profitera également. Summary: Injection drug use significantly increases the risk of infective endocarditis, a bacterial infection of one or more heart valves. When diagnosed, infective endocarditis typically requires weeks of antibiotic therapy, often intravenous. This can amount to long hospital stays, particularly for people who inject drugs, as outpatient antibiotic therapies are often not feasible. As a result, there can be significant consequences in this population such as loss of housing, childcare, and employment, which may have already been unstable at the time of their hospital admission. As such, some people who inject drugs leave the hospital before their antibiotic course is completed. This can predispose them to redeveloping the infection and can lead to other complications including death. In the general population with infective endocarditis, the outcomes with oral antibiotics after a short course of intravenous antibiotics has been shown to be similar to a full course of intravenous treatment in some patients or in patients with specific clinical characteristics. Most of the current studies, however, do not include, or include very few people who inject drugs, so limited conclusions can be made for this population. This systematic review examines the current literature for oral compared to intravenous antibiotic treatment of infective endocarditis in people who inject drugs, in order to provide a baseline of our current understanding and advocate for more research.

As loud as a construction site: Noise levels in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The Emergency Department (ED), while being an integral part of healthcare systems, frequently experiences noise levels surpassing the World Health Organization's recommended thresholds. These excessive noise levels could considerably compromise the safety and wellbeing of both patients and staff. METHODS: To evaluate noise levels throughout the ED environment, this study utilized dosimeters to measure noise levels over a 24-hour period in six distinct locations, including the ED Waiting Room and Treatment areas. RESULTS: The study found that noise exceeded the WHO recommendations in all six areas of the ED for the entire 24-hour period. Peak noise levels were recorded up to 102.8 dB, which is as loud as noise levels at a construction site. The ED Waiting Room exhibited high peak and average noise levels, indicating the urgent need for quality improvement efforts. These findings align with the results of previous research, thereby suggesting that noise levels in the ED have remained problematic for more than a decade. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing excessive noise levels in the ED to create a safe and therapeutic hospital environment for both patients and staff. Healthcare organizations must implement proactive measures to address excessive noise levels in the ED.

From Detractors to Promoters: A comparative analysis of patient experience drivers across Net Promoter Score subcategories.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of patient experience surveying by health care institutions has become increasingly prevalent, yet its effectiveness in promoting quality improvement remains uncertain. To enhance the utility of patient feedback, the examination of free-text comments may provide valuable insights to guide patient experience strategy. AIMS: This study aims to explore the utility of free-text comments and identify key differences for patient experience drivers between Net Promoter Score (NPS) subcategories of Detractors, Passives, and Promoters. METHODS: Evaluation and classification of comments was conducted using the eight Picker Principles of Person Centred Care, with descriptive analysis of patient comments performed on the NPS data. RESULTS: Analysis of patient NPS comments can be classified into three key drivers: "feeling well-treated" (for Detractors), "feeling comfortable" (for Passives), and "feeling valued" (for Promoters). Specifically, Detractor comments provided the most comprehensive and detailed feedback to guide patient experience improvement activities. CONCLUSION: This study highlights differences between NPS subcategories, particularly regarding aspects of safety, comfort, and feeling valued. Comments from Detractor respondents may be especially useful for guiding quality improvements due to increased specificity and insights. These results also emphasize the essential nature of empathy and compassionate interactions between patients and clinicians to achieve the highest level of patient satisfaction and experience.

Differences in Patient Experiences Among People From Ethnic Minority Backgrounds: A Comparative Analysis of HCAHPS Results.

Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds often experience disparities in healthcare quality and outcomes. This study aimed to compare the patient-reported experiences of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) to general patients in the Australian healthcare setting. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey was used to evaluate patient experiences from patients in a metropolitan public healthcare network, spanning three hospitals. Level of English proficiency was based on primary language spoken at home. To identify disparities in experience ratings between patients with LEP and the general cohort, independent t-tests were employed. Data was analysed from 2,291 patients, collected over a five-year period (2017-2022), with 490 patients identified as LEP (i.e. speaking a language other than English at home). Statistically significant differences were identified between the cohorts, with LEP patients rating their experiences higher in three areas: doctors listening carefully, doctors explaining in a way they could understand, and quietness at night. Conversely, patients with LEP scored lower in areas regarding nursing respect and responsiveness to call bells. Although patients with LEP had a more positive overall experience, this difference was not statistically significant. The findings indicate potential misalignment between the often poorer health outcomes among people from ethnic minority backgrounds and their experiences in hospital. Additional research is crucial to delve into the unique experiences of ethnic minority patients, including those with LEP, to understand the differences influencing perceptions of care and contributing to disparities in health outcomes.

The rare case of double valve surgery in a patient with factor VII deficiency.

Performing cardiac surgery on patients with bleeding diatheses poses significant challenges since these patients are at an increased risk for complications secondary to excessive bleeding. Despite its rarity, patients with factor VII (FVII) deficiency may require invasive procedures such as cardiac surgery. However, we lack guidelines on their pre-, peri-, and post-operative management. As FVII deficiency is rare, it seems unlikely to design and learn from large clinical studies. Instead, we need to base our clinical decision-making on single reported cases and registry data. Herein, we present the rare case of a patient with FVII deficiency who underwent double valve surgery. Pre-operatively, activated recombinant FVII (rFVIIa) was administered to reduce the risk of bleeding. Nevertheless, the patient experienced major bleeding. This case highlights the significance of FVII deficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and emphasizes the importance of adequate and appropriate transfusion of blood products for these patients.

The HUSH Project: Using codesign to reduce sleep disruptions for patients in hospital.

BACKGROUND: Poor quality sleep in hospitals may be problematic for patients, negatively impacting their recovery and wellbeing. This project aimed to investigate the effectiveness of codesign in addressing key issues affecting sleep disruption in the healthcare setting. METHODS: Codesign with patients, staff and consumer representatives was conducted in an acute metropolitan tertiary public hospital in Sydney, Australia. Through a four-stage process, a multimodal intervention to address and reduce the impact of sleep disruptions among hospital inpatients was created. Pre- and post-intervention evaluation was used to determine changes in patient-reported sleep disruption. RESULTS: 'The HUSH Project' (Help Us Support Healing) intervention resulted from the codesign process, which included the provision of HUSH Sleep Packs (with earplugs, eye masks and herbal tea), patient information resources, and ward-based Sleep Champions. Survey data from 210 patients revealed a statistically significant decrease in patient-reported noise disturbances for patients in shared rooms following the 4-week intervention period of the HUSH program. CONCLUSION: The HUSH Project demonstrated that a novel multimodal intervention may be valuable in reducing sleep disruption in hospitals. These findings also indicate the benefits of using codesign methodology to support improvement projects that seek to enhance patient experiences of care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project utilised codesign methodology, which involved significant contributions from patients and consumer representatives, from research conceptualisation into intervention design, implementation and project evaluation.

Health economic impact of Nerinetide in addition to mechanical thrombectomy without concurrent alteplase.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ESCAPE-NA1 trial has shown that intravenous Nerinetide improves clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular treatment without concurrent intravenous alteplase. We assessed the health economic impact of intravenous Nerinetide as an adjunctive treatment in endovascular treatment patients who do not receive concurrent intravenous alteplase. METHODS: Data are from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, in which acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion endovascular treatment patients were randomized to receive intravenous Nerinetide or placebo. Only those patients not treated with concurrent intravenous alteplase were included in this analysis. We used a Markov state transition model (12 months cycle length) to estimate expected lifetime costs and outcomes, assuming Nerinetide cost being zero for the purpose of this analysis. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and derived mean net monetary benefits with 95% prediction intervals from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Upper, middle, and lower willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at $50,000,$100,000, and $150,000. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Nerinetide in addition to endovascular treatment was $13,721/quality-adjusted life year (healthcare perspective) and $14,453/quality-adjusted life year (societal perspective). At the upper willingness-to-pay threshold, Nerinetide in addition to endovascular treatment resulted in a higher mean net monetary benefit compared to endovascular treatment alone, both from a healthcare perspective (449,526 [95% prediction interval: 448,627-450,425] vs. 382,584 [381,781-383,386]) and a societal perspective (350,750 [349,842-351,658] vs. 282,896 [282,068-283,725]). Mean net monetary benefits were also higher for Nerinetide in addition to endovascular treatment at the middle and lower willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: Treating patients with a cerebroprotectant, such as Nerinetide, in addition to endovascular treatmentl in patients who cannot receive intravenous alteplase may be beneficial from a health-economic standpoint.

Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes following beating heart NeoChord DS1000 mitral valve repair: a single centre case series.

Background: The NeoChord DS1000 system implants artificial neochords transapically, through a left mini-thoracotomy to treat degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Performed without cardiopulmonary bypass, neochord implantation and length adjustment is guided by transesophageal echocardiography. We describe imaging and clinical outcomes for a single center case series using this innovative device platform. Methods: In this prospective series, all study patients had degenerative MR and were considered for conventional mitral valve surgery. Moderate to high-risk candidates were screened for NeoChord DS1000 eligibility based on echocardiographic criteria. Study criteria included isolated posterior leaflet prolapse, leaflet-to-annulus index greater than 1.2, and coaptation length index greater than 5 mm. Patients with bileaflet prolapse, mitral annular calcification, and ischemic MR were excluded from our early experience. Results: Ten patients underwent the procedure, including 6 males and 4 females, with a mean age of 76 ± 9.5 years. All patients had severe chronic MR and normal left ventricular function. One patient required conversion to an open procedure for failure to deploy neochords with the device transapically. The median number of NeoChord sets was 3 (IQR 2.3-3.8). Immediate post-procedure (POD#0) degree of MR on echocardiography ranged from mild or less, and on postoperative day 1 (POD#1) from moderate or less. Average length of coaptation was 0.85 ± 0.21 cm and average depth of coaptation was 0.72 ± 0.15 cm. At 1-month follow-up echocardiography, MR was graded from trivial to moderate and left ventricular inner diameter dimensions decreased from an average of 5.4 ± 0.4 cm to 4.6 ± 0.3 cm. None of the patients who had successful NeoChord implantation required blood products. There was 1 perioperative stroke with no residual deficits. There were no device-related complications or serious adverse events. The median length of hospital stay was 3 (IQR 2.3-10) days. 30-day and 6-weeks postoperative mortality and readmission rates were 0%. Conclusion: We report the first Canadian case series using the NeoChord DS1000 system for off-pump, transapical, beating heart mitral valve repair, through a left mini-thoracotomy. The early surgical outcomes suggest this approach is feasible, safe, and effective in reducing MR. This novel procedure has the advantage of offering a minimally invasive, off-pump option for select patients with high surgical risk.

Teaching heart valve surgery techniques using simulators: a systematic review.

The apprentice model has traditionally been the primary method of teaching cardiac surgery trainees. Limitations of this model include insufficient time to learn all necessary skills, minimal exposure to rare cases and to complex repair techniques, small number of patients in small centres, high cost and absence of objective measures of feedback. In recent years, simulation-based training (SBT) has been used in order to address the gaps left by the apprentice model. We performed a systematic review of PubMed and Embase for articles investigating the use of SBT in teaching surgical valve techniques published in 2022 or earlier in order to summarize the current literature regarding the use of SBT for trainees learning surgical valve repair and replacement techniques. We compiled data on the impact of SBT on time to completion of tasks, proportion of trainees who committed technical errors, skills scores and theoretical knowledge. Studies in which outcomes were evaluated showed significant improvement in these measures after participation in SBT. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve the surgical skills of trainees in a rela-tively short period. As hands-on experience in the field of cardiac surgery is invaluable and often difficult to reproduce effectively, it is likely that a combination of hands-on training and SBT will be adopted moving forward to provide optimal exposure for surgical trainees.

Novel hardening bone putty enhances sternal closure and accelerates postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVES: Regaining and maintaining sternal stability are key to recovery after cardiac surgery and resuming baseline quality of life. Montage (ABYRX) is a moldable, calcium phosphate-based putty that adheres to bleeding bone, hardens after application, and is resorbed and replaced with bone during the remodeling process. We evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of enhanced sternal closure with this novel putty to accelerate recovery in patients after sternotomy. METHODS: A single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed (NCT03365843). Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via sternotomy received sternal closure with either Montage bone putty and wire cerclage (enhanced sternal closure; n = 33) or wire cerclage alone (control; n = 27). Standardized patient-reported outcomes assessed health-related quality of life (EQ-5D Index) and physical disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire). A Likert-type 11-point scale quantified pain. Spirometry assessed respiratory function. Patients reached 6-week follow-up, with 1-year follow-up for safety end points. RESULTS: There were no device-related adverse events. Enhanced sternal closure improved physical functional recovery (reduced Healthcare Index and Quality) and quality of life (increased EQ-5D Index) at day 5/discharge, week 2, and week 4. Enhanced sternal closure reduced incisional pain while resting, breathing, sleeping, and walking at day 5/discharge. Enhanced sternal closure reduced chest wall and back pain at day 3 and day 5 discharge. A higher proportion of patients with enhanced sternal closure recovered to 60% of their baseline forced vital capacity by day 5/discharge. Enhanced sternal closure shortened hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced sternal closure improves and accelerates postoperative recovery compared with conventional wire closure. Earlier discharge may provide substantial cost benefits for the healthcare system.

Cardiac surgery elicits pericardial inflammatory responses that are distinct compared with postcardiopulmonary bypass systemic inflammation.

Objectives: Cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass contributes to a robust systemic inflammatory process. Local intrapericardial postsurgical inflammation is believed to trigger important clinical implications, such as postoperative atrial fibrillation and postsurgical intrathoracic adhesions. Immune mediators in the pericardial space may underlie such complications. Methods: In this prospective pilot clinical study, 12 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery were enrolled. Native pericardial fluid and venous blood samples (baseline) were collected immediately after pericardiotomy. Postoperative pericardial fluid and venous blood samples were collected 48-hours after cardiopulmonary bypass and compared with baseline. Flow cytometry determined proportions of specific immune cells, whereas multiplex analysis probed for inflammatory mediators. Results: Neutrophils are the predominant cells in both the pericardial space and peripheral blood postoperatively. There are significantly more CD163lo macrophages in blood compared with pericardial effluent after surgery. Although there are significantly more CD163hi macrophages in native pericardial fluid compared with baseline blood, after surgery there are significantly fewer of these cells present in the pericardial space compared with blood. Postoperatively, concentration of interleukin receptor antagonist 6, and interleukin 8 were significantly higher in the pericardial space compared with blood. After surgery, compared with blood, the pericardial space has a significantly higher concentration of matrix metalloproteinase 3, matrix metalloproteinase 8, and matrix metalloproteinase 9. The same trend was observed with transformational growth factor ß. Conclusions: Cardiac surgery elicits an inflammatory response in the pericardial space, which differs from systemic inflammatory responses. Future work should determine whether or not this distinct local inflammatory response contributes to postsurgical complications and could be modified to influence clinical outcomes.