RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis presents a challenge due to its complex immune responses, where balance between inflammation and anti-inflammation is critical for survival. Glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) is key protein in achieving this balance, suppressing inflammation and mediating glucocorticoid response. This study aims to investigate GILZ transcript variants in sepsis patients and explore their potential for patient stratification and optimizing glucocorticoid therapy. METHODS: Sepsis patients meeting the criteria outlined in Sepsis-3 were enrolled, and RNA was isolated from whole blood samples. Quantitative mRNA expression of GILZ transcript variants in both sepsis patient samples (n = 121) and the monocytic U937 cell line (n = 3), treated with hydrocortisone and lipopolysaccharides, was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR). RESULTS: Elevated expression of GILZ transcript variant 1 (GILZ TV 1) serves as a marker for heightened 30-day mortality in septic patients. Increased levels of GILZ TV 1 within the initial day of sepsis onset are associated with a 2.2-[95% CI 1.2-4.3] fold rise in mortality, escalating to an 8.5-[95% CI 2.0-36.4] fold increase by day eight. GILZ TV1 expression is enhanced by glucocorticoids in cell culture but remains unaffected by inflammatory stimuli such as LPS. In septic patients, GILZ TV 1 expression increases over the course of sepsis and in response to hydrocortisone treatment. Furthermore, a high expression ratio of transcript variant 1 relative to all GILZ mRNA TVs correlates with a 2.3-fold higher mortality rate in patients receiving hydrocortisone treatment. CONCLUSION: High expression of GILZ TV 1 is associated with a higher 30-day sepsis mortality rate. Moreover, a high expression ratio of GILZ TV 1 relative to all GILZ transcript variants is a parameter for identifying patient subgroups in which hydrocortisone may be contraindicated.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocortisona , Sepsis , Factores de Transcripción , Humanos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/mortalidad , Hidrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Hidrocortisona/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Transcripción/análisis , Factores de Transcripción/genéticaRESUMEN
Patients with sepsis experience metabolic and immunologic dysfunction that may be amplified by standard carbohydrate-based nutrition. A ketogenic diet (KD) may offer an immunologically advantageous alternative, although clinical evidence is limited. We conducted a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to assess whether a KD could induce stable ketosis in critically ill patients with sepsis. Secondary outcomes included assessment of feasibility and safety of KD, as well as explorative analysis of clinical and immunological characteristics. Forty critically ill adults were randomized to either a ketogenic or standard high-carbohydrate diet. Stable ketosis was achieved in all KD patients, with significant increases in ß-hydroxybutyrate levels compared with controls [mean difference 1.4 milimoles per liter; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0 to 1.8; P < 0.001). No major adverse events or harmful metabolic side effects (acidosis, dysglycemia, or dyslipidemia) were observed. After day 4, none of the patients in the KD group required insulin treatment, whereas in the control group, insulin dependency ranged between 35% and 60% (P = 0.009). There were no differences in 30-day survival, but ventilation-free [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5 to 2.1; P < 0.001], vasopressor-free (IRR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5 to 2.0; P < 0.001), dialysis-free (IRR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.8; P < 0.001), and intensive care unit-free days (IRR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.1; P < 0.001) were higher in the ketogenic group. Next-generation sequencing of CD4+/CD8+ T cells and protein analyses showed reduced immune dysregulation, with decreased gene expression of T-cell activation and signaling markers and lower pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. This trial demonstrated the safe induction of a stable ketogenic state in sepsis, warranting larger trials to investigate potential benefits in sepsis-related organ dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Dieta Cetogénica , Sepsis , Humanos , Masculino , Sepsis/dietoterapia , Sepsis/sangre , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido 3-Hidroxibutírico/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Cetosis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In sepsis, initial resuscitation with fluids is followed by efforts to achieve a negative fluid balance. However, patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) often need diuretic or renal replacement therapy (RRT). The dilemma is to predict whether early RRT might be advantageous or diuretics will suffice. Both the Furosemide Stress Test (FST) and measurements of the urinary biomarkers TIMP-2*IGFBP-7, if applied solely, do not provide sufficient guidance. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of two tests, i.e., an upstream FST combined with downstream measurements of urinary TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 concentrations improves the accuracy in predicting RRT necessity. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study 100 patients with sepsis (diagnosed < 48h), AKI stage ≥ 2, and an indication for negative fluid balance were included between 02/2020 and 12/2022. All patients received a standardized FST and urinary biomarkers TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 were serially measured immediately before and up to 12 h after the FST. The primary outcome was the RRT requirement within 7 days after inclusion. RESULTS: 32% (n = 32/99) of SA-AKI patients eventually required RRT within 7 days. With the FST, urine TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 decreased within 2 h from 3.26 ng2/mL2/1000 (IQR: 1.38-5.53) to 2.36 ng2/mL2/1000 (IQR: 1.61-4.87) in RRT and 1.68 ng2/mL2/1000 (IQR: 0.56-2.94) to 0.27 ng2/mL2/1000 (IQR: 0.12-0.89) and non-RRT patients, respectively. While TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 concentrations remained low for up to 12 h in non-RRT patients, we noted a rebound in RRT patients after 6 h. TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 before FST (accuracy 0.66; 95%-CI 0.55-0.78) and the FST itself (accuracy 0.74; 95%-CI: 0.64-0.82) yielded moderate test accuracies in predicting RRT requirement. In contrast, a two-step approach, utilizing FST as an upstream screening tool followed by TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 quantification after 2 h improved predictive accuracy (0.83; 95%-CI 0.74-0.90, p = 0.03) compared to the FST alone, resulting in a positive predictive value of 0.86 (95%-CI 0.64-0.97), and a specificity of 0.96 (95%-CI 0.88-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of an upstream FST followed by urinary TIMP-2*IGFBP-7 measurements supports highly specific identification of SA-AKI patients requiring RRT. Upcoming interventional trials should elucidate if this high-risk SA-AKI subgroup, identified by our predictive enrichment approach, benefits from an early RRT initiation.
RESUMEN
This two-part article deals with the intensive medical care of traumatic brain injury. Part 1 addresses the primary treatment strategy, haemodynamic management and multimodal monitoring, Part 2 secondary treatment strategies, long-term outcome, neuroprognostics and chronification. Traumatic brain injury is a complex clinical entity with a high mortality rate. The primary aim is to maintain homeostasis based on physiological targeted values. In addition, further therapy must be geared towards intracranial pressure. In addition to this, there are other monitoring options that appear sensible from a pathophysiological point of view with appropriate therapy adjustment. However, there is still a lack of data on their effectiveness. A further aspect is the inflammation of the cerebrum with the "cross-talk" of the organs, which has a significant influence on further intensive medical care.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Resultados de Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
This two-part article deals with the intensive medical care of traumatic brain injury. Part 1 addresses the primary treatment strategy, haemodynamic management and multimodal monitoring, Part 2 secondary treatment strategies, long-term outcome, neuroprognostics and chronification. Traumatic brain injury is a complex clinical entity with a high mortality rate. The primary aim is to maintain homeostasis based on physiological targeted values. In addition, further therapy must be geared towards intracranial pressure. In addition to this, there are other monitoring options that appear sensible from a pathophysiological point of view with appropriate therapy adjustment. However, there is still a lack of data on their effectiveness. A further aspect is the inflammation of the cerebrum with the "cross-talk" of the organs, which has a significant influence on further intensive medical care.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Hemodinámica , Monitorización Hemodinámica/métodos , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is evidence that lower activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network is associated with positive outcomes in mild and moderate courses of COVID-19. The effect of this cascade in COVID-19 sepsis is still undetermined. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network in COVID-19-induced sepsis is associated with an impact on 30-day survival. METHODS: We used biomaterial from 81 prospectively recruited patients from the multicentric CovidDataNet.NRW-study cohort (German clinical trial registry: DRKS00026184) with their collected medical history, vital signs, laboratory parameters, microbiological findings and patient outcome. ERK activity was measured by evaluating ERK phosphorylation using a Proximity Ligation Assay. RESULTS: An increased ERK activity at 4 days after diagnosis of COVID-19-induced sepsis was associated with a more than threefold increased chance of survival in an adjusted Cox regression model. ERK activity was independent of other confounders such as Charlson Comorbidity Index or SOFA score (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.84, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: High activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network during the course of COVID-19 sepsis is a protective factor and may indicate recovery of the immune system. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
RESUMEN
Background: Sepsis, a life-threatening condition caused by the dysregulated host response to infection, is a major global health concern. Understanding the impact of viral or bacterial pathogens in sepsis is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) seropositivity as a risk factor for development of sepsis in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A multicenter observational study enrolled 95 intensive care patients with COVID-19-induced sepsis and 80 post-surgery individuals as controls. HCMV serostatus was determined using an ELISA test. Comprehensive clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day mortality, were collected. Statistical analyses evaluated the association between HCMV seropositivity and COVID-19 induced sepsis. Results: The prevalence of HCMV seropositivity did not significantly differ between COVID-19-induced sepsis patients (78%) and controls (71%, p = 0.382) in the entire cohort. However, among patients aged ≤60 years, HCMV seropositivity was significantly higher in COVID-19 sepsis patients compared to controls (86% vs 61%, respectively; p = 0.030). Nevertheless, HCMV serostatus did not affect 30-day survival. Discussion: These findings confirm the association between HCMV seropositivity and COVID-19 sepsis in non-geriatric patients. However, the lack of an independent effect on 30-day survival can be explained by the cross-reactivity of HCMV specific CD8+ T-cells towards SARS-CoV-2 peptides, which might confer some protection to HCMV seropositive patients. The inclusion of a post-surgery control group strengthens the generalizability of the findings. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association, explore different patient populations, and identify interventions for optimizing patient management. Conclusion: This study validates the association between HCMV seropositivity and severe COVID-19-induced sepsis in non-geriatric patients, contributing to the growing body of evidence on viral pathogens in sepsis. Although HCMV serostatus did not independently influence 30-day survival, future investigations should focus on unraveling the intricate interplay between HCMV, immune responses, and COVID-19. These insights will aid in risk stratification and the development of targeted interventions for viral sepsis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Citomegalovirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sepsis/inmunología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Anciano , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangreRESUMEN
The variability in mortality in sepsis could be a consequence of genetic variability. The glucocorticoid system and the intermediate TSC22D3 gene product-glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper-are clinically relevant in sepsis, which is why this study aimed to clarify whether TSC22D3 gene polymorphisms contribute to the variance in sepsis mortality. Blood samples for DNA extraction were obtained from 455 patients with a sepsis diagnosis according to the Sepsis-III criteria and from 73 control subjects. A SNP TaqMan assay was used to detect single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TSC22D3 gene. Statistical and graphical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics and GraphPad Prism software. C-allele carriers of rs3747406 have a 2.07-fold higher mortality rate when the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is higher than eight. In a multivariate COX regression model, the SNP rs3747406 with a SOFA score ≥ 8 was found to be an independent risk factor for 30-day survival in sepsis. The HR was calculated to be 2.12, with a p-value of 0.011. The wild-type allele was present in four out of six SNPs in our cohort. The promoter of TSC22D3 was found to be highly conserved. However, we discovered that the C-allele of rs3747406 poses a risk for sepsis mortality for SOFA Scores higher than 6.
Asunto(s)
Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis , Humanos , Glucocorticoides , Leucina Zippers , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Sepsis/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: An increasing amount of longitudinal health data is available on critically ill septic patients in the age of digital medicine, including daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score measurements. Thus, the assessment in sepsis focuses increasingly on the evaluation of the individual disease's trajectory. Machine learning (ML) algorithms may provide a promising approach here to improve the evaluation of daily SOFA score dynamics. We tested whether ML algorithms can outperform the conventional ΔSOFA score regarding the accuracy of 30-day mortality prediction. METHODS: We used the multicentric SepsisDataNet.NRW study cohort that prospectively enrolled 252 sepsis patients between 03/2018 and 09/2019 for training ML algorithms, i.e. support vector machine (SVM) with polynomial kernel and artificial neural network (aNN). We used the Amsterdam UMC database covering 1,790 sepsis patients for external and independent validation. RESULTS: Both SVM (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and aNN (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.95) assessing the SOFA scores of the first seven days led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score between day 1 and 7 (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65-0.80; p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). These differences were even more prominent the shorter the time interval considered. Using the SOFA scores of day 1 to 3 SVM (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68 0.95) and aNN (AUC 0.80; 95% CI: 0.660.93) led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score (AUC 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.74; p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Strikingly, all these findings could be confirmed in the independent external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The ML-based algorithms using daily SOFA scores markedly improved the accuracy of mortality compared to the conventional ΔSOFA score. Therefore, this approach could provide a promising and automated approach to assess the individual disease trajectory in sepsis. These findings reflect the potential of incorporating ML algorithms as robust and generalizable support tools on intensive care units.
Asunto(s)
Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Sepsis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Aprendizaje Automático , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Curva ROCRESUMEN
Sepsis is a common life-threatening disease caused by dysregulated immune response and metabolic acidosis which lead to organ failure. An abnormal expression of aquaporins plays an important role in organ failure. Additionally, genetic variants in aquaporins impact on the outcome in sepsis. Thus, we investigated the polymorphism (rs17553719) and expression of aquaporin-3 (AQP3) and correlated these measurements with the survival of sepsis patients. Accordingly, we collected blood samples on several days (plus clinical data) from 265 sepsis patients who stayed in different ICUs in Germany. Serum plasma, DNA, and RNA were then separated to detect the promotor genotypes of AQP3 mRNA expression of AQP3 and several cytokines. The results showed that the homozygote CC genotype exhibited a significant decrease in 30-day survival (38.9%) compared to the CT (66.15%) and TT genotypes (76.3%) (p = 0.003). Moreover, AQP3 mRNA expression was significantly higher and nearly doubled in the CC compared to the CT (p = 0.0044) and TT genotypes (p = 0.018) on the day of study inclusion. This was accompanied by an increased IL-33 concentration in the CC genotype (day 0: p = 0.0026 and day 3: p = 0.008). In summary, the C allele of the AQP3 polymorphism (rs17553719) shows an association with increased AQP3 expression and IL-33 concentration accompanied by decreased survival in patients with sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Acuaporinas , Sepsis , Humanos , Acuaporina 3/genética , Acuaporinas/genética , Acuaporinas/metabolismo , Genotipo , Interleucina-33/genética , Interleucina-33/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Sepsis/genética , Sepsis/metabolismoRESUMEN
Immunometabolism is a fascinating field of research that investigates the interactions between metabolic processes and the immune response. This intricate connection plays a pivotal role in regulating inflammatory reactions and consequently exerts a significant impact on the course of sepsis. The proinflammatory response during an immune reaction is closely tied to a high energy demand in immune cells. As a result, proinflammatory immune cells rapidly require substantial amounts of energy in the form of ATP, necessitating a fundamental and swift shift in their metabolism, i.e., their means of generating energy. This entails a marked increase in glycolysis within the proinflammatory response, thereby promptly meeting the energy requirements and providing essential metabolic building blocks for the biosynthesis of macromolecules. Alongside glycolysis, there is heightened activity in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The PPP significantly contributes to NADPH production within the cell, thus maintaining redox equilibrium. Elevated PPP activity consequently leads to an increased NADPH level, resulting in enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO). While these molecules are crucial for pathogen elimination, an excess can also induce tissue damage. Simultaneously, there are dual interruptions in the citric acid cycle. In the cellular resting state, the citric acid cycle acts as a sort of "universal processor", where metabolic byproducts of glycolysis, fatty acid breakdown, and amino acid degradation are initially transformed into NADH and FADH2, subsequently yielding ATP. While the citric acid cycle and its connected oxidative phosphorylation predominantly generate energy at rest, it becomes downregulated in the proinflammatory phase of sepsis. The two interruptions lead to an accumulation of citrate and succinate within cells, reflecting mitochondrial dysfunction. Additionally, the significantly heightened glycolysis through fermentation yields lactate, a pivotal metabolite for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. Conversely, cells in an anti-inflammatory state revert to a metabolic profile akin to the resting state: Glycolysis is attenuated, PPP is suppressed, and the citric acid cycle is reactivated. Of particular interest is that not only does the immune reaction influence metabolic pathways, but this connection also operates in reverse. Thus, modulation of metabolic pathways also modulates the immunity of the corresponding cell and thereby the state of the immune system itself. This could potentially serve as an intriguing avenue in sepsis therapy.
Asunto(s)
Glucólisis , Sepsis , Humanos , NADP , Glucólisis/fisiología , Ciclo del Ácido Cítrico/fisiología , Adenosina TrifosfatoRESUMEN
This will be the first meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine on postoperative pain. Our aim with this work is to evaluate the clinical utility of this relatively new substance in a broad postoperative context. Oliceridine is a new so-called bias opioid that is approved for severe pain requiring an opioid. Due to its biased agonism, it is said to have fewer side effects than conventional opioids. This systematic review and meta-analysis will analyze the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine compared to placebo or morphine in acute postoperative pain for up to 72 hours. In January 2024, an extensive search in various databases will be performed without restrictions for randomized controlled trials with at least single blinding. After data extraction, data will be pooled and meta-analytic calculations performed. A random-effects model will be used. Dichotomous data will be presented as risk ratio and continuous data as standardized mean difference. Dose-dependent side effects will be evaluated with meta-regression. Heterogeneity will be assessed via the Q statistic and prediction interval in case of a sufficient number of included studies. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plot and Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio , Compuestos de Espiro , Tiofenos , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Espiro/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Espiro/uso terapéutico , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Tiofenos/efectos adversos , Tiofenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the drugs most commonly used in critically ill patients. Although mainly applied temporarily for stress ulcer prophylaxis, their application is frequently not terminated. Potential adverse effects of PPI treatment could impact the outcome in case of unnecessary and, therefore, avoidable long-term continuation. We tested the hypotheses that nonindicated PPI therapy continued beyond hospital discharge is associated with increased morbidity, rehospitalization rate, and mortality. DESIGN: Nationwide retrospective cohort study considering critically ill patients treated on German ICUs between January, 2017, and December, 2018 with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: A total of 591,207 patient datasets of a German healthcare insurer were screened. PATIENTS: We identified 11,576 ICU patients who received PPI therapy for the first time during their index ICU stay without having an indication for its continuation. INTERVENTIONS: The cohort was stratified into two groups: 1) patients without further PPI therapy and 2) patients with continuation of PPI therapy beyond 8 weeks after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Frequency of predescribed adverse events associated with PPI therapy, 1-year rehospitalization rate, and 2-year mortality were determined. The proportion of patients with continued PPI therapy without an objectifiable indication was 41.7% (4,825 of 11,576 patients). These patients had a 27% greater risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.39; p < 0.001) and a 17% greater risk of cardiovascular events (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; p < 0.001). Continued PPI therapy was associated with a 34% greater risk of rehospitalization (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.47) and a nearly 20% greater 2-year mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.27; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that an unnecessary continuation of PPI therapy after hospital discharge may significantly impact morbidity and mortality. To avoid potentially harmful overuse of a PPIs, intensivists should ensure timely cessation of a temporarily indicated PPI therapy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Puntaje de PropensiónRESUMEN
Sepsis, a severe global healthcare challenge, is characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. The 2016 redefinition by the Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force emphasizes its complexity as a "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection". Bacterial pathogens, historically dominant, exhibit geographic variations, influencing healthcare strategies. The intricate dynamics of bacterial immunity involve recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns, triggering innate immune responses and inflammatory cascades. Dysregulation leads to immunothrombosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, contributing to the septic state. Viral sepsis, historically less prevalent, saw a paradigm shift during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the need to understand the immunological response. Retinoic acid-inducible gene I-like receptors and Toll-like receptors play pivotal roles, and the cytokine storm in COVID-19 differs from bacterial sepsis. Latent viruses like human cytomegalovirus impact sepsis by reactivating during the immunosuppressive phases. Challenges in sepsis management include rapid pathogen identification, antibiotic resistance monitoring, and balancing therapy beyond antibiotics. This review highlights the evolving sepsis landscape, emphasizing the need for pathogen-specific therapeutic developments in a dynamic and heterogeneous clinical setting.
RESUMEN
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. Novel therapeutic options are urgently needed and aquaporin inhibitors could suffice as aquaporin 5 (Aqp5) knockdown provided enhanced sepsis survival in a murine sepsis model. Potential AQP5 inhibitors provide sulfonamides and their derivatives. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that sulfonamides reduce AQP5 expression in different conditions. The impact of sulfonamides on AQP5 expression and immune cell migration was examined in cell lines REH and RAW 264.7 by qPCR, Western blot and migration assay. Subsequently, whether furosemide and methazolamide are capable of reducing AQP5 expression after LPS incubation was investigated in whole blood samples of healthy volunteers. Incubation with methazolamide (10-5 M) and furosemide (10-6 M) reduced AQP5 mRNA and protein expression by about 30% in REH cells. Pre-incubation of the cells with methazolamide reduced cell migration towards SDF1-α compared to non-preincubated cells to control level. Pre-incubation with methazolamide in PBMCs led to a reduction in LPS-induced AQP5 expression compared to control levels, while furosemide failed to reduce it. Methazolamide appears to reduce AQP5 expression and migration of immune cells. However, after LPS administration, the reduction in AQP5 expression by methazolamide is no longer possible. Hence, our study indicates that methazolamide is capable of reducing AQP5 expression and has the potential to be used in sepsis prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Metazolamida , Sepsis , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Furosemida , Lipopolisacáridos , Sulfonamidas , Movimiento Celular , Sulfanilamida , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , ARN Mensajero/genética , Acuaporina 5/genéticaRESUMEN
Sepsis involves an immunological systemic response to a microbial pathogenic insult, leading to a cascade of interconnected biochemical, cellular, and organ-organ interaction networks. Potential drug targets can depict aquaporins, as they are involved in immunological processes. In immune cells, AQP3 and AQP9 are of special interest. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that these aquaporins are expressed in the blood cells of septic patients and impact sepsis survival. Clinical data, routine laboratory parameters, and blood samples from septic patients were analyzed on day 1 and day 8 after sepsis diagnosis. AQP expression and cytokine serum concentrations were measured. AQP3 mRNA expression increased over the duration of sepsis and was correlated with lymphocyte count. High AQP3 expression was associated with increased survival. In contrast, AQP9 expression was not altered during sepsis and was correlated with neutrophil count, and low levels of AQP9 were associated with increased survival. Furthermore, AQP9 expression was an independent risk factor for sepsis lethality. In conclusion, AQP3 and AQP9 may play contrary roles in the pathophysiology of sepsis, and these results suggest that AQP9 may be a novel drug target in sepsis and, concurrently, a valuable biomarker of the disease.
Asunto(s)
Acuaporinas , Sepsis , Humanos , Acuaporina 3/genética , Acuaporina 3/metabolismo , Acuaporinas/genética , Acuaporinas/metabolismo , Sepsis/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies demonstrated that the implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline-based bundle, consisting of different supportive measures in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), might reduce rate and severity of AKI after surgery. However, the effects of the care bundle in broader population of patients undergoing surgery require confirmation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BigpAK-2 trial is an international, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial. The trial aims to enrol 1302 patients undergoing major surgery who are subsequently admitted to the intensive care or high dependency unit and are at high-risk for postoperative AKI as identified by urinary biomarkers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2*insulin like growth factor binding protein 7 (TIMP-2)*IGFBP7)). Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care (control) or a KDIGO-based AKI care bundle (intervention). The primary endpoint is the incidence of moderate or severe AKI (stage 2 or 3) within 72 hours after surgery, according to the KDIGO 2012 criteria. Secondary endpoints include adherence to the KDIGO care bundle, occurrence and severity of any stage of AKI, change in biomarker values during 12 hours after initial measurement of (TIMP-2)*(IGFBP7), number of free days of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), duration of RRT, renal recovery, 30-day and 60-day mortality, intensive care unit length-of-stay and hospital length-of-stay and major adverse kidney events. An add-on study will investigate blood and urine samples from recruited patients for immunological functions and kidney damage. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The BigpAK-2 trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Münster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. A study amendment was approved subsequently. In the UK, the trial was adopted as an NIHR portfolio study. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04647396.