Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; : 102100, 2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50-70% of patients have at least one medication discrepancy in their initial medication history. These discrepancies can lead to errors on admission and discharge orders and have the potential to cause patient harm and incur added costs associated with increased length of stay and readmission rates. Several studies have demonstrated improved medication history accuracy with pharmacy-conducted services, but variations in practice exist due to challenges with workflow and resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of implementing a patient risk scoring tool for the prioritization of medication history review by pharmacy staff. METHODS: This quasi-experimental, single-center study was conducted at a 948-bed academic medical center as a pilot study with the medication history team which consists of pharmacists and technicians in the emergency department (ED). The endpoints assessed included pharmacy completion rate of patients in the high-risk category, overall pharmacy conducted medication history rate, and the proportion of medication discrepancies identified after reconciliation. RESULTS: The number of medication histories completed by pharmacy (n=849) decreased by 5.7% in the post-intervention period (P=0.002). Between the pre- and post-intervention period, there were less low risk patients being captured by pharmacy (89.7% to 59.9%, respectively). There was also an increase in the number of medium-risk (Δ=25.4%) and high-risk patients (Δ=4.4%) being captured by pharmacy staff (P<0.017, α=0.017). CONCLUSION: Use of a risk scoring tool allowed pharmacy staff to prioritize workflow and capture more high-risk patients.

2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(11): 3584-3594, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37706219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medication related clinical decision support (CDS) interventions may improve patient safety. In older patient populations, there has been effort placed in reducing exposure to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). After years of reducing exposure of older adults in our hospitals to PIMs through multi-component interventions, our system chose to expand the scope and attempt a new strategy to lessen alert burden for providers and pharmacists. Based on the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria and internal data, a passive CDS approach, termed "geriatric context" was established to recommend appropriate medication selection including lower dosage amounts and frequency of administration in older adults. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study examining change in a pre and post implementation analysis of medication usage patterns between two 9-month time periods in 2019 and 2021 in patients age ≥65 years across an 8-hospital health system. The primary endpoint is the percentage of each medication intervened with an ordered dose and frequency outside of alignment with recommended context parameters. Secondary endpoints include total daily dose (TDD) and average dose (AD) per patient of the individual PIMs. Exploratory endpoints include frequency of active alerts fired by the CPOE and overridden by providers. RESULTS: A total of 62,738 older adult hospital admissions are included in the overall study period, with 32,969 pre-implementation and 29,769 post-implementation. Haloperidol showed the greatest reduction in inappropriate doses from 41.5% to 21.4% (p < 0.001) of orders, followed by reduction in inappropriate frequencies in orders for diphenhydramine from 57.2% to 39.7% (p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints showed favorable reductions across 11 of the 16 medications in both TDD and AD administered. Exploratory analysis with select medications showed reductions in frequency of alerts fired and overridden. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a passive CDS positively influences prescribing patterns for older adults and reduces the alert burden to ordering providers.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Humanos , Anciano , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización
3.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(2): 286-294, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34392711

RESUMEN

Background: A theoretical interaction exists between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral (ARV) agents and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), although the clinical significance is unclear. Objective: This study aimed to assess characteristics, prescribing patterns, and outcomes associated with concomitant therapy. Methods: A single-center, retrospective review was performed on patients older than 18 years prescribed a DOAC for any indication with concurrent interacting ARV(s) from June 2016 through June 2019. The primary endpoint was to assess prescribing and population characteristics. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate safety outcomes, DOAC level monitoring, readmissions, outpatient follow-up, and DOAC modification interventions. Results: Thirty-six patients (72 hospital admissions) were identified. The most common DOAC was apixaban (83.3%) and ARV was ritonavir (50%). Of the 72 encounters, 26 (36.1%) DOACs were dosed appropriately per guideline recommendations. Twenty pharmacy interventions for therapy modification were recognized. Eleven (30.6%) patients experienced bleeding and 2 (5.6%) thrombosis. Of the adverse events, all patients had renal impairment. Conclusions: As DOAC utilization grows, increasing use in HIV could be expected. More frequent adjustment or avoidance is recommended per guidelines. Our data suggest the majority of patients receive CYP3A4-inhibiting regimens. Caution should be employed with renal insufficiencies. Further studies are warranted to assess safety and efficacy within this population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Anticoagulantes , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34260685

RESUMEN

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Integrating smart pumps with an electronic health record (EHR) reduces medication errors by automating pump programming and EHR documentation. This study describes the patient safety and financial impact of pump-EHR interoperability at a community hospital. METHODS: A 316-bed community hospital in Sugar Land, TX, went live with pump-EHR interoperability in October 2019. Data were collected from April 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019 (before implementation) and from April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020 (after implementation). Rates of drug library compliance, alert firing, alert override, override within 2 seconds, high-risk alert override, and alert resulting in pump reprogramming were measured. Financial impact was measured by Current Procedural Terminology code capture per kept appointment in the infusion center. RESULTS: Drug library compliance increased from 73.8% to 82.9% with pump-EHR interoperability (P < 0.001). Infusions generating alerts among all infusions programmed with the drug library decreased from 3.5% to 2.6% (P < 0.001), overridden alerts increased from 64.8% to 68.9% (P < 0.001), alerts overridden within 2 seconds decreased from 17.3% to 13.8% (P < 0.001), and reprogrammed alerts decreased from 20.7% to 18.3% (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Pump-EHR interoperability leads to safer administration of intravenous medications based on improved drug library compliance and more accurate smart pump programming.

5.
J Pharm Pract ; 34(2): 190-198, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31303103

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, no consensus approach exists for optimal venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) patients. Time to development of in-hospital VTE is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates time to in-hospital VTE in obese patients. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study evaluated obese patients that developed an in-hospital VTE. Patients were categorized into 3 BMI groups: 30 to 34.9 (group 1), 35 to 39.9 (group 2), and ≥40 (group 3) kg/m2. The primary end point compared time to VTE between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, and time to VTE was similar between the groups, 8 (group 1) versus 8 (group 2) versus 9 days (group 3); P = .38. Secondary outcomes showed time to VTE was shorter in acute care versus ICU patients (7.5 vs 10 days; P = .01), nonsurgical versus surgical patients (6 vs 9 days; P = .004), and no prophylaxis versus mechanical plus pharmacologic prophylaxis (4.5 vs 9 days; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: BMI category did not significantly impact time to in-hospital VTE. This study provides insight into the timing of in-hospital VTE in obese patients. The differences in prophylactic strategies highlight the importance of optimized prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Obesidad/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
6.
J Pharm Pract ; 33(1): 21-29, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909711

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older adults with cognitive impairment may have difficulty understanding and complying with medical or medication instructions provided during hospitalization which may adversely impact patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of cognitive impairment among patients aged 65 years and older within 24 hours of hospital admission using Mini-Cog™ assessments performed by advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) students. METHODS: Students on APPE rotations were trained to perform Mini-Cog™ assessments during routine medication education sessions from February 2017 to April 2017. The primary end point was the prevalence of cognitive impairment indicated by a Mini-Cog™ score of ≤3. Secondary end points were the average number of observed Mini-Cog™ practice assessments required for APPE students to meet competency requirements, caregiver identification, and 30-day hospital readmissions. RESULTS: Twelve APPE students completed the training program after an average of 4.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.0) graded Mini-Cog™ assessments. Of the 1159 admissions screened, 273 were included in the analysis. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 55% (n = 149, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48%-61%). A caregiver was identified for 41% (n = 113, 95% CI: 35%-47%) of patients, and 79 patients had a caregiver present at bedside during the visit. Hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge was 15% (n = 41, 95% CI: 11%-20%). CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairment could substantially impair a patient's ability to comprehend education provided during hospitalization. Pharmacy students can feasibly perform Mini-Cog™ assessments to evaluate cognitive function, thereby allowing them to tailor education content and involve caregivers when necessary.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Educación en Farmacia/tendencias , Evaluación de Necesidades , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Estudiantes de Farmacia
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(8): 1638-1645, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30035315

RESUMEN

Delirium threatens the functional independence and cognitive capacity of patients. Medications, especially those with strong anticholinergic effects, have been implicated as a preventable cause of delirium. We evaluated the effect of multicomponent interventions aimed at reducing the use of 9 target medications in hospitalized older adults at risk of delirium. This continuous quality improvement program was undertaken at a tertiary care facility and 4 community hospitals in a hospital system. We included 21, 541 hospital admissions with patients aged 70 and older on acute care medical or surgical units from the preintervention (2012) period, and 27,764 from the postintervention (2015) period. Implemented interventions include formulary and policy changes, technology-assisted medication review, age-conditional order set modifications, best practice alerts, and education. The proportion of hospital admissions with individual's receiving at least 1 target medication declined from 45.6% to 31.3% (relative reduction (RR)=31.4%) from before to after the intervention, meaning that target medication exposure was avoided in approximately 4,000 older adults. The greatest effect was observed for zolpidem (11.2% to 5.3%, RR=52.6%) and diphenhydramine (12.9% to 7.1%, RR=45%). Furthermore, the mean number of doses administered during all hospital admissions was reduced for 7 of 9 medications. Multicomponent interventions implemented in our hospital system were effective at reducing exposure to target medications in hospitalized older adults at risk of delirium. These systematic changes applied throughout the medication use process are sustained today.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Delirio/inducido químicamente , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Gestión de Riesgos/normas
8.
J Pharm Pract ; 31(6): 651-657, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017425

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The objective of our study is to determine the time to in-hospital VTE based on baseline risk stratification. METHODS: All adult patients admitted to a 900-bed academic tertiary referral hospital who developed a VTE during hospital admission from September 1, 2011, to June 30, 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years or if the VTE was present on admission. RESULTS: The cohort included 400 patients, 224 (56%) males, median age 66 years. The median time to VTE was 8 days. Significant differences in time to VTE existed between the risk groups. CONCLUSION: Time to VTE in a broad hospitalized patient population differs based on admission risk group. This finding highlights the importance of performing risk assessment upon admission and subsequently with clinical changes to assess increases in risk scores.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...