A scoping review of health system guidelines for pharmacist responsibilities when dispensing opioids.

Introduction: Prescription opioid use and evidence of the harm caused by these medicines has increased over the past 20-30 years. Despite a number of system level interventions, the opioid crisis has not yet resolved in Australia or globally. Pharmacists are increasingly required to take a proactive, clinical role to fulfil their responsibility for patient outcomes relating to both medication efficacy and safety. Aim: To evaluate the current health system guidelines available to pharmacists dispensing opioids and to examine the implications of this guidance on pharmacist responsibility. Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science, in addition to the grey literature and referral from topic experts to collate a list of current health system guidelines relevant to pharmacists dispensing opioids. These guidelines were then examined through thematic analysis and the use of the "Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation-Health Systems" tool (AGREE-HS). Results: Ten health system guidelines were identified in the search. Identified guidelines were published in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Health system guidelines analysed in this study most commonly provide general practice statements that are not specific to opioid medicines. Current guidelines frequently recommend risk assessment, but less commonly provide implementable risk mitigation advice. Additionally, guidelines are of poor overall quality when analysed through metrics relating to their development and implementation. Conclusion: There are gaps in current health system guidelines which contribute to perceived barriers in pharmacy practice. Current health system guidance does not provide a clear account of the responsibilities of pharmacists when dispensing opioids. This study provides an argument for the development of implementable health system guidelines that support pharmacists in taking direct responsibility for patient outcomes when dispensing opioid medicines.

Duration of opioid use and association with socioeconomic status, daily dose and formulation: a two-decade population study in Queensland, Australia.

Background There is an association between the duration of prescription opioids use and an increased risk of serious harm, often unintentional. Objective (1) Describe the trends in duration of prescription opioids dispensing and, (2) determine the risk of long-term use (≥4 months) based on patients' socioeconomic status, daily dose in oral daily morphine milligram equivalent, and opioid formulation. Setting Residents of Queensland (2,827,727), Australia from the age 18 years and who were dispensed pharmaceutical opioids from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2018. Method Retrospective, longitudinal population-based analysis using data obtained from the Monitoring of Drugs of Dependence system of the Monitored Medicines Unit of Queensland Health. Main outcome measure Contribution of socioeconomic status, and daily dose and opioid formulation (modified-release or immediate-release) to the risk of long-term opioid use. Results There was little difference between the number of patients dispensed opioids for ≥4 months and ≤3 months between 1997 and 2011. Thereafter, the number for those using opioids long-term increased. The highest risk of having opioids dispensed for ≥4 months were for patients in the lowest level of socioeconomic status (adjusted odds ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.34, 1.38), compared to people in the highest socioeconomic status areas, followed by the low-socioeconomic status areas, mid-socioeconomic status areas, and high-socioeconomic status areas respectively. The risk of being dispensed prescription opioids for ≥4 months significantly increased as the dose increased: adjusted odds ratio 1.73; 95% CI, 1.71, 1.75, adjusted odds ratio 1.89; 95% CI, 1.87, 1.92, and adjusted odds ratio 3.63; 95% CI, 3.58, 3.69 for the ≥20 to <50 oral daily morphine milligram equivalent, ≥50 to <100 oral daily morphine milligram equivalent and ≥100 oral daily morphine milligram equivalent dose categories, respectively. Conclusion Higher doses and living in a low socioeconomic status areas were associated with increased risk of long-term dispensing of opioid prescriptions.

Pharmaceutical opioids utilisation by dose, formulation, and socioeconomic status in Queensland, Australia: a population study over 22 years.

Background Prescription opioids are a central aspect of pain management and as the prevalence of pain is increasing so is the rate of use of prescription opioids. Increased opioid prescriptions increases the risk of deaths and morbidity. Objective To (a) describe the 22-year trend of prescription opioid dispensing in Queensland, (b) examine the effect of opioid dose, formulation and socioeconomic status on the number of prescriptions dispensed. Design/setting Retrospective analysis of data from the Monitoring of Drugs of Dependence system of the Monitored Medicines Unit of Queensland Health, Australia. Participants Queensland residents (3.3 million) from 18 years old dispensed 18.8 million opioid prescriptions from January 1997 to December 2018. Results Opioid prescriptions dispensed annually increased to over two million in 2018 from about 150,000 prescriptions in 1997. The number of prescriptions for modified-release formulations dispensed annually was three times higher compared to the immediate-release formulations. Oxycodone accounted for over 60% of prescriptions for pharmaceutical opioids since 2013. There was an increase in the number of prescriptions dispensed as socioeconomic status decreased and modified-release opioid formulations positively affects the pattern of dispensing. The highest increase in number of prescriptions dispensed (for all opioids) was observed among the high socioeconomic status (IRR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.25, 1.26). The disparities in the annual number of prescriptions across dose categories are wider in the modified-release than the immediate-release formulations. Conclusion The dispensing of opioids increased significantly in Queensland. There was a positive relationship between the increased dispensing of opioids and locations of lower socioeconomic status.

Multiple opioid prescribers: A genuine quest for treatment rather than aberrant behaviour. A two-decade population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Accessing multiple prescribers for opioid prescription, referred to as doctor-shopping, is associated with an increased risk of opioid overdose and fatalities. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to assess the probability of accessing multiple prescribers among patients dispensed prescription opioids. METHOD: A retrospective population-based study using the Monitoring of Drugs of Dependence system of the Medicines Monitoring Unit (MMU) of Queensland Health, Australia. We assessed the odds of accessing multiple prescribers across both -short-term (≤1 month, 2-3 months) and longer-term (4-6 months and ≥7 months). We examined the relationship between multiple doctor visits, the dispensed dose of opioid and patient's residential socioeconomic status (SES). RESULT: Compared to those dispensed opioid prescriptions for ≥7-12 months, those dispensed opioids for ≤1 month were more likely to have visited ≥3 prescribers (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)) 4.06, 95% CI 4.01, 4.10, while for 2-3 months and 4-6 months the odds were aOR 2.36, 95% CI 2.33, 2.39 and aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.74, 1.79 respectively. Patients dispensed opioid doses of ≥100 oral morphine milligram equivalent per day (MME/day) were more likely to obtain prescriptions from ≥3 prescribers compare to those receiving a dose of <20MME/day (aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.87, 1.94). The probability of obtaining opioid prescriptions from multiple prescribers increased as the socioeconomic status decreased: aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.38, 1.44 for lowest SES compared to the highest SES. CONCLUSION: Patients were more than four time likely to be dispensed opioid prescriptions from multiple prescribers within the first 30 days of initiating opioid treatment, possibly as part of multidisciplinary referral post-hospital discharge. High dose opioid and low SES was associated with higher probability of accessing multiple prescribers.

Awareness and use of medication management services in relation to medication adherence prior to hospitalisation among older adults in Regional Australia.

Background Ageing is associated with changes in physiology, functional ability, declined in cognition and multiple co-morbidities. Alterations in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic aspects also occur. Medications can improve the quality of life in people with multiple co-morbidities; polypharmacy and ageing could increase risks of medication misadventures and adverse events leading to hospital admissions. Medication management services (MedsCheck, Diabetes MedsCheck and Home Medication Review) were implemented in Australia to: increase patients' knowledge about their medicines, increase patients' confidence in using their medicines, and reduce avoidable hospital admissions. Objective This study aims to investigate patients' awareness, understanding and uptake of medication management services in relation to medication adherence. Setting Study was conducted at the Maryborough hospital, Queensland, Australia. Method This was a questionnaire based prospective study. A questionnaire was developed based on the questions used in the evaluation of the MedsCheck and Diabetes MedsCheck pilot program. Main outcome/Result We identified 243 participants of which 198 patients agreed to participate. Of the participants, 68.1% were taking more than five different medications a day and 34.3% of participants were taking more than 10 different medications a day. Those that consumed five or more doses of medication a day constitutes 72%. Only 3% had accessed medication management services prior to hospital admission. Many of participants (76.3%) noted that they had issues with different generics/brands of medication and only 23.2% of participants stated that they had a good understanding of drug-drug interactions. Conclusion Hospitalised patients are unaware of medication management services that could reduce frequency of re-hospitalisation. Community and hospital pharmacists can play a major role increasing patients' awareness of the availability of these services.

Prescription Opioid Fatalities: Examining Why the Healer Could be the Culprit.

Prescription opioid use has increased rapidly in developed countries, as have fatalities and other related adverse events. This review examines the intrinsic characteristics of opioids, including their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, to determine how the use of a regonised pharmacological remedy for a medically confirmed ailment could result in an accidental fatality. Opioids trigger biological processes that inhibit their own therapeutic effect. Prolonged use of opioids can result in activation of pronociceptive systems, leading to opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance, while opioid metabolites can antagonise the antinociceptive action of the parent drug, also leading to opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance. Pain stimulates respiration and counteracts the respiratory depression effect of opioids. Analgesia from opioids leads to loss of this protective mechanism, leading to increased risk of death due to respiratory failure. Increased patient counseling during opioid prescribing and dispensing, and limiting prescription to short-term use in non-malignant pain, may decrease the adverse effects of opioids. The vast majority of patients who unintentionally experience serious adverse events from pharmaceutical opioids do not start out as drug seekers. Even opioid use within prescribing guidelines can place some patients at risk of death and may prevent patients from seeking help for prescription opioid dependence.

Prescribed Dose of Opioids and Overdose: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unintentional Prescription Opioid Overdose.

BACKGROUND: The rate of an unintentional drug overdose involving prescription opioids continues to rise. An understanding of the threshold dose and dose(s) associated with unintentional prescription opioid overdose will help to mitigate this epidemic. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to systematically synthesise and meta-analyse studies on doses of prescription opioids and ascertain the doses of opioids that are associated with increased risk of severe opioid poisoning or mortality. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science from inception to 16 January 2017 was conducted using search strategies and the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms for studies of adult patients using prescription opioids who experienced an accidental overdose. STUDY SELECTION: Of the 1332 studies identified, 117 were selected for full article review. Ten met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, but only seven studies were meta-analysed. The included studies were in English, and participants met predetermined International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Studies were excluded if they included only paediatric participants or the participants met the ICD code for intentional self-harm. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers elaborated and validated a data extraction form. Data were then independently extracted by both reviewers as per this form. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. We performed a meta-regression using a random-effect model and summarised the results using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The threshold dose for an unintentional overdose is 20 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day. There were higher risks with larger doses: (1) ≤ 20 versus ≥ 21 MME/day: RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.09-7.22, p < 0.001; (2) ≤ 50 versus > 50 MME/day: RR 3.87, 95% CI 2.36-6.33, p < 0.001; (3) ≤ 100 versus > 100 MME/day: RR 4.28, 95% CI 2.61-7.1, p < 0.001; and (4) ≤ 50 versus > 50-100 MME/day: RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.84-5.18, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was explained by the type of overdose event, inpatient or outpatient status, and length of observation. Type of pain (cancer or non-cancer pain) had no impact on heterogeneity. LIMITATIONS: The definition of exposure in studies included in the meta-analysis was heterogeneous. Some studies defined exposure as the filling of a prescription while others defined exposure as the prescription of an opioid to the patient, and all studies assumed that patients took the prescribed opioid. Medications that may contribute to overdose, such as benzodiazepines and other drugs, were not considered. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly increased risk of inadvertent prescription opioid overdose was found with 20-50 MME/day, with fatality more likely with opioid doses above 50 MME/day, although extensive heterogeneity was found with the dose comparisons. Clinicians should inform patients of this risk and monitor them closely. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered with PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017058426.