Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Transplant ; 15(7): 1836-42, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25931200

RESUMEN

Geographic variability in access to care is a persistent challenge in transplantation. Little is known about how patients with end-stage liver disease are chosen for referral, evaluation and listing. Utilizing death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 2002 to 2009, estimated liver demand (ELD) was measured by aggregating annual deaths from liver disease and liver transplants performed in each donor service area (DSA). In DSAs with higher ELD, more patients per capita were listed for transplantation (p < 0.001). In addition, listing rates per ELD varied fivefold across DSAs, with more patients per ELD being transplanted in DSAs with higher listing rates (p < 0.001). After adjusting for liver donor risk index and MELD at transplant, there was no association between listing rate and posttransplant survival (HR 1.002, p = 0.77). In addition, DSAs with lower listing rates were more likely to export organs (p < 0.001) of lower liver donor risk index (p < 0.001). Listing sicker patients was associated with increased access to the waitlist and transplantation and more efficient organ utilization, but had minimal effect on posttransplant outcomes after adjusting for the resulting organ shortage.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Listas de Espera/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hepatopatías/mortalidad , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos
2.
Am J Transplant ; 15(4): 1061-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25758952

RESUMEN

Public perception and misperceptions of socioeconomic disparities affect the willingness to donate organs. To improve our understanding of the flow of deceased donor kidneys, we analyzed socioeconomic status (SES) and racial/ethnic gradients between donors and recipients. In a retrospective cohort study, traditional demographic and socioeconomic factors, as well as an SES index, were compared in 56,697 deceased kidney donor and recipient pairs transplanted between 2007 and 2012. Kidneys were more likely to be transplanted in recipients of the same racial/ethnic group as the donor (p < 0.001). Kidneys tended to go to recipients of lower SES index (50.5% of the time, p < 0.001), a relationship that remained after adjusting for other available markers of donor organ quality and SES (p < 0.001). Deceased donor kidneys do not appear to be transplanted from donors of lower SES to recipients of higher SES; this information may be useful in counseling potential donors and their families regarding the distribution of their organ gifts.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Trasplante de Riñón , Clase Social , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...