Is the lateral angle of the internal acoustic canal sexually dimorphic in non-adults? An investigation by routine cranial magnetic resonance imaging.

The lateral angle of the internal acoustic canal is one of the measurements of petrous bone that has been previously studied for sex estimation, mostly in adults. We aimed at evaluating the effects of age, side, and sex on the lateral angle of the internal acoustic canal in pediatric patients. Pediatric routine cranial MRI studies were retrospectively investigated for this study. The lateral angle was measured on T2-weighted axial images when the anterior and posterior lips of the meatus and the cochlea were clearly visible on the same image. The data were evaluated for age, side and sex-related changes. Although 552 temporal bones from 273 patients were inspected, due to exclusion criteria lateral angle could be satisfactorily measured only in 101 temporal bones from 58 patients. The measurements did not differ significantly between sexes. An age-related, statistically significant decrease was observed for the entire pediatric sample studied, as well as for the males, but not for females. The measurements did not differ from side to side. The significant age-related decrease in lateral angle in male pediatric patients that was not detected in female counterparts may be the reflection of a sex-related difference in temporal bone development during childhood. Routine cranial MRI data may help investigators study age and sex-related changes in lateral angle in children.

Comparision of anti-HLA antibodies of kidney transplant candidates with chronic renal failure by two different methods: Flow-PRA and Luminex PRA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare anti-HLA antibodies examined as panel-reactive antibody (PRA) in kidney transplant candidates with chronic renal failure (CRF) with the use of 2 methods: Flow-PRA and Luminex-PRA. METHODS: CRF patients displaying class I PRA (n = 34) and/or class II PRA (n = 41) were tested by the 2 different methods from April 2012 to September 2012, using antigen-coated beads. RESULTS: Eleven (32.3%) 34 patients tested for class I PRA were female and 23 (67.7%) male; 17 (41.5%) 41 patients tested for class II PRA were female and 24 (58.5%) male. Only 2 patients were preemptive, the others had been subjected to dialysis. The concordance ratio of class I PRA test results between Flow-PRA and Luminex PRA was 67.6%. Whereas 13 samples (38.2%) were positive by Flow-PRA, 22 (64.7%) were positive by Luminex-PRA. Two of the 3 patients not previously immunized were found to be positive only by Luminex PRA; 1 was noted to be positive only by Flow-PRA. Regarding class II PRA screening, the concordance between Flow-PRA and Luminex PRA was 70.7%. Whereas 14 (34.1%) samples were positive for Flow-PRA; 24 (58.5%) were positive for Luminex-PRA. The 2 patients not previously immunized were positive only in Luminex PRA. CONCLUSIONS: We speculated that the reason for the low concordance ratios was due to the use of sera that had been previously found to be indeterminate in PRA tests. We also speculated that the low concordance ratios were due to the coating procedure for the beads, which may cause changes in antigenic epitopes and decrease concordance between Flow-PRA and Luminex-PRA.