RESUMEN
Purpose: Oxygen may cause serious consequences when administered wrongly. This study aimed to assess doctors' and nurses' knowledge of acute oxygen therapy and perceived delivery barriers. Participants and Methods: We conducted a cross sectional study among 202 healthcare providers (134 doctors and 68 nurses) in a Nigerian hospital. The validated Acute Oxygen Therapy Questionnaire (AOTQ), which consisted of 21 knowledge assessment questions, was self administered by participants. Provider's knowledge was classified as good if the score was≥80% and poor if < 60%. Results: Overall, 26.7% (37.3% doctors and 5.9% nurses) had good knowledge of acute oxygen therapy (AOT), 35.9% were aware, and 19.3% used the AOT guidelines. The commonest source of knowledge on oxygen therapy was medical /nursing school (75.2%). The participants' mean knowledge score was 14.75 ± 2.83(possible score of 0-21). Doctors in postgraduate (PG) training obtained the highest score (15.96±2.48) among the participants (F=12.45, df=4, p<0.001). Most doctors (62%) and 23.5% of nurses considered oxygen as a drug. More doctors (52.2%) than nurses (14.7%) believed that a doctor's order was mandatory before oxygen administration, contrary to guidelines recommendations. Most nurses did not know that breathlessness does not always signify hypoxemia and that asymptomatic anemia was not an indication for oxygen. Concerning oxygen prescription, 39.7% of nurses and 64.2% of doctors knew that it should be prescribed to achieve a target saturation range rather than a fixed dose. In acute oxygen delivery in COPD, doctors and nurses exhibited poor knowledge of the appropriate device and flow rate. The reported barriers to oxygen delivery were: a shortage of oxygen supply, inadequate delivery devices, power outages and out of pocket costs. Conclusion: A significant proportion of doctors and nurses had poor knowledge of acute oxygen therapy, poor awareness and infrequently used AOT guidelines, and reported pertinent delivery barriers that warrant educational and administrative interventions.
RESUMEN
Purpose: The burdens of chronic cough are mostly reported from Western and Asian countries. We aimed to determine the etiology and clinical patterns of chronic cough (CC) in the chest clinic of a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Patients and Methods: This survey was a cross-sectional study of 218 patients. Chronic cough was defined as cough >8 weeks duration. The evaluation and diagnosis of patients was based on a diagnostic protocol developed from the international respiratory societies cough guidelines and a previous study. Results: The median age of patients was 50 years (interquartile range 30-68). One etiology was identified in 96.3% of cases; dual etiologies in 2.3%, and 1.4% had an unexplained cough. The most frequent causes of cough were COPD (33.5%), PTB (27.1%), and asthma (21.1%) which included 3 cases of cough variants of asthma (CVA). Other causes were post-tuberculosis lung disease (bronchiectasis and fibrosis) in 6.9%, lung cancer in 4.7%, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in 3.2%. Gastroesophageal-related cough (GERC) accounted for <1.0%. Before the age of 45, the chronic cough was more frequent in the females than in the males, and the commonest cause was asthma, whereas, beyond age ≥ 45, the occurrence in males surpasses that of the females, and the commonest cause was COPD. Eighty-six percent reported shortness of breath as the most associated symptom. Systemic hypertension (15.6%) was the most frequent comorbidity, followed by HIV infection (3.7%). Chest radiograph, sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF for TB, spirometry, and detailed history and trial of treatment, were enough to identify the cause in 72% of cases. Conclusion: The etiology and clinical patterns of chronic cough in this study are different from the western countries. When evaluating and managing chronic cough, clinicians in sub-Saharan Africa and TB endemic countries should consider these geographical variations in etiologies and clinical presentation.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Urbanization is associated with the risk of developing allergic conditions. Few studies have evaluated the urban-rural disparity of allergic diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidemiology of adult asthma and allergies in urban and rural Nigeria. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was performed among 910 subjects in Kwara State, North Central Nigeria, comprising 635 urban and 275 rural adults who were randomly selected. We used standardized questionnaires for data collection. RESULTS: The age-adjusted prevalence of adults reporting a previous "asthma attack" or "currently taking asthma medication" within the preceding 12 months (ECRHS asthma definition) was 3.4% urban, 0.5% rural, current allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (26.2% urban, 22.2% rural), and current skin allergy (13.9% urban, 10.5% rural). The age-adjusted prevalence of "physician-diagnosed allergic conditions": asthma (3.3% urban, 1.5% rural), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (4.9% urban, 3.2% rural), and skin allergy (4.8% urban, 4.6% rural) were higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Urban areas recorded a higher age-adjusted 12 months prevalence of wheezing, night waking by breathlessness, night waking by chest tightness, asthma attack (p=0.042), and current use of asthma medication (p=0.031) than the rural areas. In the urban areas, 81% of those with asthma significantly had current allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and 40.5% had current skin allergy, whereas in the rural areas, all subjects with asthma had current allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and 12.5% had current skin allergy (p=0.482). The most common trigger for asthma attack/respiratory symptoms among the urban household was exposure to environmental smoke (17.2%), and among the rural household, it was dust exposure (18.2%). Living in urban areas significantly increased the odds of having asthma [aOR: 5.6 (95% CI:1.6-19.6)] and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis [aOR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.4)]. CONCLUSION: This study shows that urban residents frequently reported more allergic and respiratory symptoms and were at risk of having asthma and allergic rhinitis compared to rural residents. The findings would assist the physicians in understanding the urban-rural differences in the occurrence of allergic conditions, symptom triggers, and comorbidity, which are relevant in patient's clinical evaluation, treatment, and disease prevention.
