Individualized Dose-Response to Statins Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes.

Background: Statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and are efficacious in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Dose-response to statins varies among patients and can be modeled using three distinct pharmacological properties: (1) E0 (baseline LDL-C), (2) ED50 (potency: median dose achieving 50% reduction in LDL-C); and (3) Emax (efficacy: maximum LDL-C reduction). However, individualized dose-response and its association with ASCVD events remains unknown. Objective: We analyze the relationship between ED50 and Emax with real-world cardiovascular disease outcomes. Method: We leveraged de-identified electronic health record data to identify individuals exposed to multiple doses of the three most commonly prescribed statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, or rosuvastatin) within the context of their longitudinal healthcare. We derived ED50 and Emax to quantify the relationship with a composite outcome of ASCVD events and all-cause mortality. Results: We estimated ED50 and Emax for 3,033 unique individuals (atorvastatin: 1,632, simvastatin: 1,089, and rosuvastatin: 312) using a nonlinear, mixed effects dose-response model. Time-to-event analyses revealed that ED50 and Emax are independently associated with the primary endpoint. Hazard ratios were 0.85 (p < 0.01), 0.83 (p < 0.01), and 0.87 (p = 0.10) for ED50 and 1.13 (p < 0.001), 1.06 (p < 0.001), and 1.15 (p = 0.009) for Emax in the atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: The class-wide association of ED50 and Emax with clinical outcomes indicates that these measures influence the risk for ASCVD events in patients on statins.

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2022 Cases of SCMR case series.

"Cases of SCMR" is a case series on the SCMR website (https://www.scmr.org) for the purpose of education. The cases reflect the clinical presentation, and the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. The 2022 digital collection of cases are presented in this manuscript.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation of COVID-19.

Cardiovascular involvement following COVID-19 is heterogeneous, prevalent and is often missed by echocardiography and serum biomarkers (such as troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard non-invasive imaging modality to phenotype unique populations after COVID-19, such as competitive athletes with a heightened risk of sudden cardiac death, patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome, and people suspected of having COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. This review summarises the key attributes of CMR, reviews the literature that has emerged for using CMR for people who may have COVID-19-related complications after COVID-19, and offers expert opinion regarding future avenues of investigation and the importance of reporting findings.