Secondary Primary Cancer Risk After Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether radiation therapy (RT) has an impact on the development of secondary primary cancer (SC) in rectal cancer (RC) patients, especially within the true pelvis. AIM: To examine the incidence of SC in a population-based cohort of RC after surgical treatment with or without radiation therapy (RT, NRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The epidemiological cohort consisting of 13,919 RC patients with primary M0 stage diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 was collected from cancer registry data of Upper Bavaria. Competing risk analyses were conducted regarding the development of SC on 11 687 first malignancies, stratified by RT/NRT. A propensity score (PS) was generated by logistic regression modeling of RT to repeat competing risk analyses on a PS-matched cohort. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range) of the epidemiological cohort was 68.9 years (60.4-76.7). About 60.8%, were men, 38.7% had UICC III, 35.8% of tumors were localized lower than 8 cm, 41.3% underwent RT. Only 17.1% of patients older than 80 years at diagnosis received RT. In general, RT patients were 5 years younger than NRT patients (65.9 years [58.0-73.0] vs. 71.3 years [62.4-79.2], P < .0001). The 20-year cumulative incidence of SC was 16.5% in RT and 17.4% in NRT patients (P = .2298). Men with RT had a lower risk of prostate cancer (HR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.34-0.91], P = .0168). In the PS-matched cohort, RT patients had a significantly higher risk of bladder cancer during follow-up (10-year cumulative incidence of 1.1% vs. 0.6% in NRT). The direction of the RT effects in men and women and different tumor sites may cancel each other. CONCLUSION: A protective effect of RT in rectal cancer patients on developing prostate SC by half is reproduced. Further analyses studying the long-term SC risks of RT should essentially focus on stratification by sex, and focus on more recent data.

The other colon cancer: a population-based cohort study of appendix tumour trends and prognosis.

AIM: Appendiceal neoplasms are rare subtypes of colorectal tumours that mainly affect younger patients some 20 years earlier than other colon tumours. The aim of this study was to gain more insight into the histological subtypes of this rare disease and include cases previously excluded, such as mucinous neoplasia. METHOD: The cohort study included 1097 patients from the Munich Cancer Registry (MCR) diagnosed between 1998 and 2020. Joinpoint analysis was used to determine trend in incidence. Baseline demographic comparisons and survival analyses using competing risk and univariate/multivariate methods were conducted according to tumour histology: adenocarcinoma (ADENO), neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN), mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC), and low- (LAMN) and high-grade mucinous neoplasia (HAMN). RESULTS: Up to 2016 the number of cases increased significantly [annual per cent change (APC) = 6.86, p < 0.001] followed by a decline in the following years (APC = -14.82, p = 0.014; average APC = 2.5, p = 0.046). Comparison of all patients showed that NEN (48.4%) and mucinous neoplasms (11.6%) had a considerably better prognosis than ADENO (36.0%) and MANEC (3.0%, p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis within the NEN and ADENO subgroups revealed that further histological classification was not prognostically relevant, while older age and regional tumour spread at diagnosis were associated with a poor prognosis. ADENO histology with high tumour grade and appendectomy only was also associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSION: Appendiceal neoplasms are histologically heterogeneous; however, this diversity becomes less relevant compared with the marked difference from cancers of the remaining colon. The previously observed increase in cases appears to be abating; fewer cases of appendicitis and/or appendectomies or changes in histopathological assessment may be behind this trend.

[Bowel resections for Crohn's disease: developments over the last three decades]. / Drei Dekaden Darmresektionen bei Patienten mit M. Crohn.

BACKGROUND: The present observational study demonstrates developments of surgery in Crohn's disease patients undergoing bowel resection at two tertiary referral centers during the recent 3 decades. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing intestinal resections were included. Exclusion criteria were: resection for malignancy, mere stoma formation and closure, bowel resections for other reasons than Crohn's disease, abdomino-perineal resections for anal fistula. Data collection was retrospective between 1992 and 2004, and prospective thereafter. Six time periods were compared: 1992-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2015 several significant developments could be observed: decline in preoperative steroid intake, increase in preoperative intake of immunomodulators and biologic agents; abandonment of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation, increase in surgery for penetrating disease and more patients with previous bowel resections, increase in laparoscopy use, stoma rate and postoperative morbidity. Since 2016, mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics were (re)introduced, there was significantly more laparoscopic surgery (67%), preoperative steroid and immunomodulator intake diminished, whereas preoperative biological therapy increased; patients were older and less were active smokers; stoma formation rate and morbidity rate decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: There were several very strong trends in Crohn's disease surgery during the last 3 decades. However, present results cannot be generalized to broader patient' population.

Damage control strategy in perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: The best treatment for perforated colonic diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis is still under debate. Concurrent strategies are resection with primary anastomosis (PRA) with or without diverting ileostomy (DI), Hartmann's procedure (HP), laparoscopic lavage (LL) and damage control surgery (DCS). This review intends to systematically analyze the current literature on DCS. METHODS: DCS consists of two stages. Emergency surgery: limited resection of the diseased colon, oral and aboral closure, lavage, vacuum-assisted abdominal closure. Second look surgery after 24-48 h: definite reconstruction with colorectal anastomosis (-/ + DI) or HP after adequate resuscitation. The review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA-P Statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) and EMBASE were searched using the following term: (Damage control surgery) AND (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum OR Peritonitis). RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies including 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. No randomized trial was available. 67% of the included patients had purulent, 30% feculent peritonitis. In 3% Hinchey stage II diverticulitis was found. In 49% the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) was greater than 26. Colorectal anastomosis was constructed during the course of the second surgery in 73%. In 15% of the latter DI was applied. The remaining 27% received HP. Postoperative mortality was 9%, morbidity 31% respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 13%. 55% of patients were discharged without a stoma. CONCLUSION: DCS is a safe technique for the treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, allowing a high rate of colorectal anastomosis and stoma-free hospital discharge in more than half of the patients.

Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are limited. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the outcomes of colonoscopic eFTR in different hospitals from different care levels in correlation with the number of endoscopists performing eFTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case series, the data of all patients who underwent eFTR between November 2014 and June 2019 (performed by a total of 22 endoscopists) in 7 hospitals were analyzed retrospectively regarding rates of technical success, R0 resection, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Colonoscopic eFTR was performed in 229 patients (64.6% men; average age 69.3 ± 10.3 years) mainly on the basis of the following indication: 69.9% difficult adenomas, 21.0% gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and 7.9% subepithelial tumors. The average size of the lesions was 16.3 mm. Technical success rate of eFTR was achieved in 83.8% (binominal confidence interval 78.4-88.4%). Overall, histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 77.2% (CI 69.8-83.6%) while histologically proven full-wall excidate was confirmed in 90.0% (CI 85.1-93.7%). Of the resectates obtained (n = 210), 190 were resected en bloc (90.5%). We did not observe a clear improvement of technical success and R0 resection rate over time by the performing endoscopists. Altogether, procedure-related complications were observed in 17.5% (mostly moderate) including 2 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis requiring operation. DISCUSSION: In this pooled analysis, eFTR represents a feasible, effective, and safe minimally invasive endoscopic technique.

PREDICtors for health-related quality of life after elective sigmoidectomy for DIVerticular disease: the PREDIC-DIV study protocol of a prospective multicentric transnational observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Diverticulitis is among the most common abdominal disorders. The best treatment strategy for this complicated disease as well as for recurrent stages is still under debate. Moreover, little knowledge exists regarding the effect of different therapeutic strategies on the health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Therefore, the PREDIC-DIV (PREDICtors for health-related quality of life after elective sigmoidectomy for DIVerticular disease) study aims to assess predictors of a change in HrQoL in patients after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre transnational observational study was started in November 2017. Patients undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease were included. Primary outcome includes HrQoL 6 months postoperatively, staged by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Secondary outcomes include HrQoL 6 months after sigmoidectomy, assessed using the Short Form 36 Questionnaire and a custom-made Visual Analogue Scale-based inventory; HrQoL after 12 and 24 months; postoperative morbidity; mortality; influence of surgical technique (conventional laparoscopic multiport operation vs robotic approach); histological grading of inflammation and morphological characteristics of the bowel wall in the resected specimen; postoperative functional changes (faecal incontinence, faecal urge, completeness of emptying, urinary incontinence, sexual function); disease-specific healthcare costs; and changes in economic productivity, measured by the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire. The total follow-up will be 2 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Bavarian Medical Council (report identification number: 2017-177). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Open, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery, Diseases of the Colon and the Rectum). Abstracts will be submitted to relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov register as NCT03527706; Pre-results.

Risk of colectomy after conservative treatment of diverticulitis of the left hemicolon complicated by abdominal or pelvic abscess: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is increasingly treated by a non-operative approach. The need for colectomy after recovery from a flare of acute diverticulitis of the left colon, complicated diverticular abscess is still controversial. The primary aim of this study is to assess the risk of interval emergency surgery by systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE will be screened for the predefined searching term: (Diverticulitis OR Diverticulum) AND (Abscess OR pelvic abscess OR pericolic abscess OR intraabdominal abscess) AND (surgery OR operation OR sigmoidectomy OR drainage OR percutaneous drainage OR conservative therapy OR watchful waiting). All studies published in an English or German-speaking peer-reviewed journal will be suitable for this analysis. Case reports, case series of less than five patients, studies without follow-up information, systematic and non-systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be excluded. Primary endpoint is the rate of interval emergency surgery. Using the Review Manager Software (Review Manager/RevMan, V.5.3, Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012) meta-analysis will be pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method for random effects. The Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool will be used to assess methodological quality of non-randomised studies. Risk of bias in randomised studies will be assessed using the Cochrane developed RoB 2-tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no new data are being collected, ethical approval is exempt for this study. This systematic review is to provide a new insight on the need for surgical treatment after a first attack of acute diverticulitis, complicated by intra-abdominal or pelvic abscesses. The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020164813.

Frequency of Polyps and Adenocarcinoma in Colon Interposition After Esophagectomy in Adulthood - A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Colon interposition counts among the most common techniques for reconstruction after esophagectomy. Availability of data on metachronous mucosal pathologies is weak. The aim of this review was to identify all reports on the development of metachronous adenoma and adenocarcinoma in colon interposition after esophagectomy in adulthood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München. All studies reporting on patients who received colon interposition as substitute after esophagectomy in adulthood for benign and malignant reasons were included. RESULTS: Five retrospective studies were included, reporting on 1016 patients. Therein, no interval lesion was identified. One further study, which formally must be excluded for a misfit to inclusion criteria reports on three interval carcinomas within 365 patients. Because these lesions were the only ones found within a cohort analysis, results were supplementary reported in this review. Additionally, 31 case reports including 32 patients with benign (n=7) or malignant (n=25) findings were analyzed. Median age was 63.5 years (interval carcinoma) and 69 years (benign lesion). Benign and malignant lesions were diagnosed after a median of 8.5 years. CONCLUSION: Due to the rareness of respective cohort studies, the frequency of metachronous lesions cannot be calculated accurately. The estimated rate of interval carcinoma is 0-0.22%. Life-long endoscopic surveillance of patients with colon interposition is recommended.

Total Versus Near-total Thyroidectomy in Graves Disease: Results of the Randomized Controlled Multicenter TONIG-trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that the incidence of hypoparathyroidism after surgery for Graves disease (GD) is lower after subtotal thyroidectomy compared to total thyroidectomy (TT). The present study evaluated the incidence of postoperative hypoparathyroidism after near-total (NTT) versus TT in GD. METHODS/DESIGN: In a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with GD were randomized intraoperatively to NTT or TT. Primary endpoint was the incidence of transient postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Secondary endpoints were permanent hypoparathyroidism, transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP), reoperations for bleeding, inadvertently removed parathyroid glands, and recurrent hyperthyroidism after 12 months. RESULTS: Eighteen centers randomized 205 patients to either TT (n = 102) or NTT (n = 103) within 16 months. According to intention-to-treat postoperative transient hypoparathyroidism occurred in 19% (20/103) patients after NTT and in 21% (21 of 102) patients after TT (P = 0.84), which persisted >6 months in 2% and 5% of the NTT and TT groups (P = 0.34). The rates of parathyroid autotransplantation (NTT 24% vs TT 28%, P = 0.50) and transient RLNP (NTT 3% vs TT 4%, P = 0.35) was similar in both groups. The rate of reoperations for bleeding tended to be higher in the NTT group (3% vs 0%, P = 0.07) and the rate of inadvertently removed parathyroid glands was significantly higher after NTT (13% vs 3%, P = 0.01). An existing endocrine orbitopathy improved in 35% and 24% after NTT and TT (P = 0.61). Recurrent disease occurred in only 1 patient after TT (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: NTT for GD is not superior to TT regarding transient postoperative hypoparathyroidism.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME: standardization using the "critical view" concept.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision is gradually becoming an established oncologic surgical principle for right hemicolectomy. However, the procedure is technically demanding and carries the risk of serious complications, especially when performed laparoscopically. A standardized procedure that minimizes technical hazards and facilitates teaching is, therefore, highly desirable. METHODS: An expert group of surgeons and one anatomist met three times. The initial aim was to achieve consensus about the surgical anatomy before agreeing on a sequence for dissection in laparoscopic CME. This proposal was evaluated and discussed in an anatomy workshop using post-mortem body donors along with videos of process-informed procedures, leading to a definite consensus. RESULTS: In order to provide a clear picture of the surgical anatomy, the "open book" model was developed, consisting of symbolic pages representing the corresponding dissection planes (retroperitoneal, ileocolic, transverse mesocolic, and mesogastric), vascular relations, and radicality criteria. The description of the procedure is based on eight preparative milestones, which all serve as critical views of safety. The chosen sequence of the milestones was designed to maximize control during central vascular dissection. Failure to reach any of the critical views should alert the surgeon to a possible incorrect dissection and to consider converting to an open procedure. CONCLUSION: Combining the open-book anatomical model with a clearly structured dissection sequence, using critical views as safety checkpoints, may provide a safe and efficient platform for teaching laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.

Perioperative chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma : A population-based evaluation of the Munich Cancer Registry.

BACKGROUND: To date, it remains unclear whether locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) should be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), analogous to esophageal cancer, or with perioperative chemotherapy (pCT), analogous to gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the data of the Munich Cancer Registry (MCR) and to compare pCT and nCRT in AEG patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,992 AEG patients, treated between 1998 and 2014, were included in the study. Baseline and tumor parameters as well as overall survival (OS) and tumor recurrence were compared between 56 patients undergoing nCRT and 64 patients undergoing pCT with UICC stage II/III cancer. In addition, uni- and multivariate analyses using Cox regression models were performed to evaluate the effect of tumor characteristics and treatment regimens on OS. RESULTS: In patients with UICC stage II/III AEG treated with either nCRT or pCT, no significant differences were seen for baseline and tumor characteristics. While there was a significantly higher cumulative incidence of locoregional treatment failure after pCT (32.8%; 95% CI: 18.0-48.4%) compared with nCRT (7.4%; 95% CI: 2.3-16.5%; p = 0.007), there was no significant difference for distant treatment failure (52.9%; 95% CI: 35.4-67.7% and 38.4%; 95% CI: 23.7-52.9%; p = 0.347). When analyzing the whole cohort, patients who received pCT were younger (58.3 years vs. 63.0 years; p = 0.016), had a higher chance of complete tumor resection (81% vs. 67%; p = 0.033), more resected lymph nodes (p = 0.036), and fewer lymph node metastases (p = 0.038) compared with patients who received nCRT. Nevertheless, there was still a strong trend toward a higher incidence of local treatment failure after pCT (25.8%; 95% CI: 14.7-38.3% vs. 12.6%; 95% CI: 5.5-22.8%; p = 0.053). Comparable to the results for patients with UICC stage II/III, no difference was seen for the incidence of distant treatment failure. When excluding patients with UICC stage IV cancer, no significant difference was found for OS. CONCLUSION: For UICC stage II/III carcinoma, nCRT was associated with an improved locoregional tumor control compared with pCT, while no further significant differences were seen between nCRT and pCT for UICC stage II/III AEG. Moreover, there was a strong trend toward improved locoregional tumor control after nCRT when analyzing all patients treated with nCRT or pCT, despite these patients having higher risk factors.

Surgical management of acute appendicitis in adults: A review of current techniques.

Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent disorders in abdominal surgery. Therefore, appendectomy is a matter of significant interest in that field. Yet, four different techniques are available: open appendectomy, (conventional) laparoscopic appendectomy, single port laparoscopic appendectomy and NOTES-appendectomy with its different variations. To evaluate the current state of the art in appendectomy a bibliographic search was conducted. All prospectively randomized trials and national register cohort studies published between 1/2010 and 5/2016 were included into the analysis. Overall, 25 respective studies were identified. All studies were screened for the following parameters: surgical site infection (SSI) (wound infection (WI) or intraabdominal abscess (IAA)), postoperative pain (PP), length of surgery (LoS), length of hospital stay (LHS), return to normal activities (RNA). Today the rate of laparoscopic appendectomy is reported to be up to 86% in the recent literature. Open appendectomy remains a safe and effective technique. Single port laparoscopic appendectomy presented almost equal in terms of safety and patient satisfaction. The method is still not as widespread as conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy, presumably due to the necessity of special equipment and training. NOTES appendectomy is the newest development in appendectomy technique. First prospective cohort studies proved the safety and feasibility in experienced hands. However, the method is still experimental and further prospectively randomized trials are necessary. Concluding the current evidence, a laparoscopic approach, which is most commonly and increasingly frequently used, could be called "state of the art" in the treatment of appendicitis.

Clinical Value of Contrast Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure.

Purpose To determine the value of routine contrast enema of loop ileostomy before elective ileostomy closure regarding the influence on the clinical decision-making. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of contrast enemas at a tertiary care center between 2005 und 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I with ileostomy reversal, group II without ileostomy closure. Patient-related parameters (underlying disease, operation method) and parameters based on the findings (stenosis, leakage of anastomosis, incontinence) were evaluated. Results Analyzing a total of 252 patients in 89 % (group I, n = 225) ileostomy closure was performed. In 15 % the radiologic report was the only diagnostic modality needed for therapy decision; in 36 % the contrast enema and one or more other diagnostic methods were decisive. In 36 % the radiological report of the contrast imaging was not relevant for decision at all. In 11 % (group II, n = 27) no ileostomy closure was performed. In this group in 11 % the radiological report of the contrast enema was the only decision factor for not performing the ileostomy reversal. In 26 % one or more examination was necessary. In 26 % the result of the contrast examination was not relevant. Conclusion The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in complex surgical decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method in detecting complications and often leads to additional examinations. Key points · Contrast enema of loop ileostomy before planned ileostomy closure is a frequently performed examination.. · There exist no general guidelines that give further recommendations on decision-making planning ileostomy closure.. · The radiologic contrast imaging of loop ileostomy solely plays a minor role in decision-making before planned reversal, but is important as first imaging method.. Citation Format · Goetz A, da Silva NP, Moser C et al. Clinical Value of Contrast Enema Prior to Ileostomy Closure. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 855 - 863.

Intrapancreatic mass: A rare cause.

We found a case of pancreatic extraintestinal gastrointestinal stroma tumor (pEGIST) in 2014. The patient, initially suspected to suffer from pancreatic adenocarcinoma, underwent open left hemipancreatectomy and en bloc splenectomy in May 2014. Postoperative histopathology showed the unexpected manifestation of a pEGIST. Recovery was well, and a 23-month follow-up was free from recurrency by now.

Living-donor parathyroid allotransplantation for therapy-refractory postsurgical persistent hypoparathyroidism in a nontransplant recipient - three year results: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Therapy-refractory persistent hypoparathyroidism after extensive neck surgery is a rare but severe complication. Parathyroid allotransplantation may represent a definitive treatment option. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year old female was referred to our hospital with intractable persistent hypocalcemia after neck surgery for papillary thyroid cancer. Despite optimal medical treatment including calcium and vitamin D supplementation and even hormonal replacement therapy hypocalcemic symptoms failed to improve. The quality of life was considered very low. In light of the unsuccessful medical therapy and the young age of the patient parathyroid allotransplantation seemed an attractive treatment option to restore normal calcium homeostasis despite of the need for immunosuppressive therapy after the procedure. Therefore, we performed living-donor allotransplantation of two healthy parathyroid glands to the recipient's left forearm. The surgical intervention was successful. Neither the donor nor the recipient showed any complications. In the postoperative course clinical symptoms of hypocalcemia significantly improved whereas serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels progressively increased into the normal range. Former intense replacement therapy could be discontinued completely in a stepwise fashion. To date, nearly three years after transplantation, the patient remains asymptomatic with normal serum levels of calcium and PTH. CONCLUSION: Successful living-donor parathyroid allotransplantation for postsurgical hypoparathyroidism represents an innovative therapeutic strategy that could provide the definitive treatment in those patients in which the disease is therapy-refractory. The procedure can be justified even in nontransplant recipients. Retrieval of parathyroid glands from healthy donors is feasible and safe.

Prognosis of mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort.

PURPOSE: Besides classical colorectal adenocarcinomas (AC), mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (SC) occur. Controversy remains regarding their prognostic role. Aim of this study was to define prognostic and histopathological specifications of mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 28,056 patients with AC, MAC, and SC between 1998 and 2012 in the catchment area of the Munich Cancer Registry were analyzed. Time to locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence was calculated by cumulative incidence. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, calculation of relative survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: AC occurred in 25,172 patients (90 %), MAC in 2724 (9.7 %), and SC in 160 (0.6 %). AC were less frequently localized in the proximal colon (34 %) compared to MAC (57 %, p < 0.001) and SC (76 %, p < 0.001). Both, MAC and SC had higher T, N, and M categories, lymphatic invasion, and worse grading (p < 0.001 for each). There were significant differences regarding the 10-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (p < 0.001), and distant recurrence (p < 0.001). For AC, the 5-year overall survival was 59 % (95 % confidence interval 58.0; 59.3), for MAC 52 % (50.2; 54.2), and for SC 40 % (32.1; 48.5; p < 0.001). However, MAC or SC did not remain independent prognostic factors for overall survival compared to AC upon multivariable analysis (p = 0.981). CONCLUSION: This large cohort reveals specific histopathological and recurrence patterns for patients with colorectal AC, MAC, and SC. MAC and SC are diagnosed at more advanced tumor stages and therefore entail reduced survival rates.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective single-center analysis using the ENETS TNM-classification and immunohistochemical markers for risk stratification.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to assess the 2006 introduced ENETS TNM-classification with respect to patient survival and surgical approach for patients who underwent surgery for a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas (PNET). METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010 38 patients after resection of a PNET were investigated regarding tumor localization and size. Further, patient survival with regards to the new TNM-classification, the operation methods and immunohistochemical markers was analyzed. RESULTS: The estimated mean survival time of the 38 patients was 91 ± 10 months (female 116 ± 9, male 56 ± 14 months; p = 0.008). The 5-year survival rate was 63.9%. Patient survival differed significantly depending on tumor size (pT1 107 ± 13, pT2 94 ± 16, pT3 44 ± 7 and pT4 18 ± 14 months; P = 0.006). Patients without lymph node metastasis survived significantly longer compared to patients with positive lymph node status (108 ± 9 vs. 19 ± 5 months; P < 0.001). However, survival in patients with and without distant metastasis did not differ significantly (92 ± 11 vs. 80 ± 23 months; P = 0.876). Further, the tumor grading significantly influenced patient survival (G1 111 ± 12, G2 68 ± 12 and G3 21 ± 14 months; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: As part of the TNM-classification especially lymph node status and also tumor size and grading were identified as important factors determining patient survival. Further, gender was demonstrated to significantly influence survival time. If an R0 resection was achieved in patients with distant metastases patient survival was comparable to patients without metastasis.

Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a structured international expert consensus on a detailed technical description of the laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic TME is a common surgical approach for the treatment of rectal cancer, but there is little agreement on technical details and standards. METHODS: Sixty leading surgical experts from 5 different world regions with a median overall experience of 250 laparoscopic TME participated in this study. Four stages of mixed quantitative and qualitative consensus-finding methods were applied. (1) Semistructured expert interviews were independently analyzed by 2 assessors. (2) Consensus on the interview data was reached using reiterating questionnaires (Delphi method). (3) This was further refined in an interactive workshop. (4) Based on this meeting, a comprehensive text was drafted and final approval was sought by all experts. FINDINGS: Three theme categories were identified in 9 detailed interviews (anatomical landmarks, description of tissue retraction, and operating strategies). Following 2 rounds of a 54-item questionnaire, 29 items achieved very high agreement (A* ≥90%), 14 with good agreement (≥80%), 13 with moderate agreement (≥50%), and 18 with little or no agreement (<50%). In the workshop, areas of agreement were consolidated and conclusions were sought for those with less agreement. The final document was approved after 2 further rounds of surveys by all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: This detailed and agreed technical description of laparoscopic TME may have implications on training, assessment, quality control, and future research.

Local recurrence in the neck and survival after thyroidectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most investigations of thyroidectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are case studies or small series. This study was conducted to determine the contribution of clinical and histopathologic variables to local recurrence in the neck and overall survival after thyroidectomy for RCC metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 140 patients with thyroidectomy for metastatic RCC performed between 1979 and 2012 at 25 institutions in Germany and Austria were analyzed. RESULTS: The median interval between nephrectomy and thyroidectomy was 120 months. Concurrence of thyroid and pancreatic metastases was present in 23 % of the patients and concurrence of thyroid and adrenal metastases in 13 % of the patients. Clinical outcome data were available for 130 patients with a median follow-up period of 34 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 46 %, and 28 % of patients developed a local neck recurrence at a median of 12 months after thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that invasion of adjacent cervical structures (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2; p = 0.001), patient age exceeding 70 years (HR 2.5; p = 0.004), and current or past evidence of metastases to nonendocrine organs (HR 2.4; p = 0.003) were independent determinants of inferior overall survival. Conversely, invasion of adjacent cervical structures (HR 12.1; p < 0.0001) and year of thyroidectomy (HR 5.7 before 2000; p < 0.0001) were shown to be independently associated with local recurrence in the neck by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant improvement of local disease control in patients with thyroid metastases of RCC has been achieved during the last decade, overall outcome continues to be poor for patients with locally invasive thyroid metastases.

Laparoscopic trans- and retroperitoneal adrenal surgery for large tumors.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for tumors larger than 6 cm is currently a matter of controversial discussion because of difficult mobilization from surrounding organs and a possible risk of capsule rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy between 1/1994 and 7/2012 were collected and analysed retrospectively. Intra- and postoperative morbidity in patients with tumors ≤6 cm (group 1, n = 227) were compared to patients with tumors >6 cm, (group 2, n = 52). RESULTS: Incidence of adrenocortical carcinoma was significantly higher in group 2 patients (6.3% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.039) whereas the incidence of aldosterone-producing adenoma was lower (2% vs. 25%, P = 0.001). Mean duration of surgery was longer (105 min vs. 88 min, P = 0.03) and the estimated blood loss was higher (470 mL vs. 150 mL) in group 2 patients. Intraoperative bleeding rate (5.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.041), and the conversion rate were significantly higher (5.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.011) in group 2. Also, postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in group 2 (11.5% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.022). However, only two major complications occurred, one in each group. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive adrenal surgery can be performed by an experienced surgeon even in patients with large tumors (>6 cm) with an increased but still acceptable intra- and postoperative morbidity.