Chromosomal microarray testing yield in 829 cases of microcephaly: a clinical characteristics-based analysis for prenatal and postnatal cases.

INTRODUCTION: Microcephaly, characterized by abnormal head growth, can often serve as an initial indicator of congenital, genetic, or acquired disorders. In this study, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing in detecting abnormalities in both prenatal and postnatal cases of microcephaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CMA Testing: We conducted CMA testing on 87 prenatally-detected microcephaly cases and 742 postnatal cases at a single laboratory. We evaluated the CMA yield in relation to specific clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In prenatal cases, pathogenic and likely pathogenic (LP) results were identified in 4.6% of cases, a significantly higher rate compared to low-risk pregnancies. The male-to-female ratio in this cohort was 3, and the CMA yield was not influenced by gender or other clinical parameters. For postnatal cases, the CMA yield was 15.0%, with a significantly higher detection rate associated with dysmorphism, hypotonia, epilepsy, congenital heart malformations (CHM), learning disabilities (LD), and a history of Fetal growth restriction (FGR). No specific recurrent copy number variations (CNVs) were observed, and the rate of variants of unknown significance was 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of CMA testing in prenatal microcephaly is lower than in postnatal cases (4.6% vs. 15%). The presence of microcephaly, combined with dysmorphism, hypotonia, epilepsy, CHD, LD, and FGR, significantly increases the likelihood of an abnormal CMA result.

Prevalence of high-penetrant copy number variants in 7734 low-risk pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: The rate of clinically significant copy number variants in chromosomal microarray analysis in low-risk pregnancies is approximately 1%. However, these results include copy number variants with low and variable penetrance, although some patients might be interested only in the detection of high-penetrant variants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to calculate the prevalence of high-penetrant copy number variants in a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was performed using microarray results of pregnancies with normal ultrasound and maternal serum screening. All clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were recorded. Of these, only high-penetrant findings were selected. Findings with low and medium penetrance and copy number variants with unknown clinical penetrance, including uniparental disomy of segments not related to known imprinted syndromes, mosaic aneuploidy of <50%, and segmental mosaicism, were excluded. The calculation was performed for the overall cohort, for women aged >35 years and women aged <35 years, and after omission of noninvasive prenatal screening theoretically detectable findings (trisomies 13, 18, and 21). RESULTS: Clinically significant copy number variants were detected in 118 of 7734 cases (1.50% or 1:65), and high-penetrant copy number variants were detected in 33 of 7734 cases (0.43% or 1:234). In women aged ≥35 years, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants were 29 of 5734 cases (0.51% or 1:198) and 4 of 2000 cases (0.20% or 1:500) in women aged <35 years (P=.0747). Following the omission of 12 theoretically noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings, the rates of high-penetrant copy number variants declined to 21 of 7722 cases (0.27% or 1:368) in the whole cohort-18 of 5723 cases (0.31% or 1:318) in woman aged ≥35 years and 3 of 1999 cases (0.15% or 1:666) in younger women (P=.319). CONCLUSION: The risk of high-penetrant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies exceeds the risk of miscarriage after invasive testing, even after normal noninvasive prenatal screening results. These results are of importance to genetic counselors and obstetricians, to facilitate maternal informed decision-making when considering invasive prenatal testing in low-risk pregnancies.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Compared With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies With Abnormal Maternal Serum Screening.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of maternal age on the rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and to establish the residual risk for abnormal microarray findings after omitting noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-detectable aberrations in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening. METHODS: This retrospective study included all chromosomal microarray analysis tests performed in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and normal ultrasonogram results over the years 2013-2021. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis findings was compared with a local control cohort of 7,235 pregnancies with normal maternal serum screening and ultrasonogram results, stratified by maternal age. Calculation of residual risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results after normal NIPT was performed by omission of common NIPT-detectable anomalies. Systematic review for studies examining the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening was performed from inception to October 2021, with no time or language restrictions. RESULTS: Of the 559 amniocenteses performed due to abnormal maternal serum screening, 21 (3.8%; 95% CI 2.4-5.7%) clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results were found. The residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis aberrations after theoretically normal NIPT was estimated to be 2.0% (95% CI 1.1-3.6%) (1/50) and was significantly higher for women younger than age 35 years with abnormal maternal serum screening, compared with women with low-risk pregnancies. Systematic review yielded six articles encompassing 4,890 chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening, demonstrating 2.3% residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis anomalies after theoretically normal NIPT. DISCUSSION: Clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis findings can be found in 1 of every 50 pregnancies with high-risk maternal serum screening after theoretically normal NIPT, implying that invasive testing and not NIPT should be recommended in such pregnancies. In addition, NIPT use as a first-tier screening modality instead of maternal serum screening would miss pregnancies at increased risk not only for common autosomal trisomies but for additional chromosomal microarray analysis-detectable disorders.

Prenatal and postnatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 885 cases of various congenital heart defects.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) variants detected by chromosomal microarray (CMA) tests performed for prenatally and postnatally detected congenital heart defects. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of CMA analyses over a period of four years in a single tertiary medical center was performed. Detection rate of clinically significant variants was calculated in the whole cohort, prenatal vs. postnatal cases, and isolated vs. non-isolated CHD. This rate was compared to previously published control cohorts, and to a theoretical detection rate of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPS; 5 chromosomes). RESULTS: Of the 885 cases of CHD, 111 (12.5%) clinically significant variants were detected, with no significant difference between the 498 prenatal and the 387 postnatal cases (10.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.08). In both groups, the detection rate was significantly higher for non-isolated vs. isolated CHD (76/339 = 22.4% vs. 35/546 = 6.4%, respectively, p < 0.05). The detection rate was higher than the background risk in both groups, including cases of postnatal isolated CHD. 44% of abnormal findings in the prenatal setting would be detectable by NIPS. CONCLUSION: CMA should be performed for both prenatally and postnatally detected CHD, including postnatal cases of isolated CHD, while NIPS can be considered in specific scenarios.

Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis detects a clinically significant amount of copy number variants in approximately 1% of low-risk pregnancies. As the constantly growing use of noninvasive prenatal screening has facilitated the detection of chromosomal aberrations, defining the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings following normal noninvasive prenatal screening is of importance for making informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: The chromosomal microarray results of all pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis between the years 2013 and 2021 in a large hospital-based laboratory were collected. Pregnancies with sonographic anomalies, abnormal maternal serum screening, or multiple fetuses were excluded. Clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) copy number variants were divided into the following: 3-noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (trisomies 13, 18, and 21), 5- noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including sex chromosome aberrations), 5-noninvasive prenatal screening and common microdeletion-detectable (including 1p36.3-1p36.2, 4p16.3-4p16.2, 5p15.3-5p15.1, 15q11.2-15q13.1, and 22q11.2 deletions), and genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable (including variants >7 Mb). The theoretical residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants was calculated following the exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings. RESULTS: Of the 7235 pregnancies, clinically significant copy number variants were demonstrated in 87 cases (1.2%). The residual risk following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening was 1.07% (1/94) for 3-noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.78% (1/129) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening, 0.74% (1/136) for 5- noninvasive prenatal screening including common microdeletions, and 0.68% (1/147) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In the subgroup of 4048 pregnancies with advanced maternal age, the residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants following theoretically normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 1.36% (1/73) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.82% (1/122) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. In 3187 pregnancies of women <35 years, this residual risk ranged from 0.69% (1/145) for 3- noninvasive prenatal screening to 0.5% (1/199) for genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant copy number variants in pregnancies without structural sonographic anomalies is appreciable and depends on the noninvasive prenatal screening extent and maternal age. This knowledge is important for the patients, obstetricians, and genetic counselors to facilitate informed decisions regarding prenatal testing and screening options.

The phenotype of 15 cases with rare 8q24.13-q24.3 deletions-A new syndrome or still an enigma?

Diagnosis of rare copy number variants (CNVs) with scarce literature evidence poses a major challenge for interpretation of the clinical significance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results, especially in the prenatal setting. Bioinformatic tools can be used to assist in this issue; however, this prediction can be imprecise. Our objective was to describe the phenotype of the rare copy number losses encompassing the 8q24.13-q24.3 locus, and to find common features in terms of genomic coordinates, gene content, and clinical phenotypic characteristics. Appropriate cases were retrieved using local databases of two largest Israeli centers performing CMA analysis. In addition, literature and public databases search was performed. Local database search yielded seven new patients with del (8)(q24.13q24.3) (one of these with an additional copy number variant). Literature and public databases search yielded eight additional patients. The cases showed high phenotypic variability, ranging from asymptomatic adults and fetuses with normal ultrasound to patients with autism/developmental delay (6/11 postnatal cases, 54.5%). No clear association was noted between the specific disease-causing/high-pLI gene content of the described del (8)(q24.13q24.3) to neurodevelopmental disorders, except for a possibly relevant locus encompassing the KCNQ3 gene. We present the challenges in classification of rare variants with limited clinical information. In such cases, genotype-phenotype correlation must be assessed with extra-caution and possibly using additional methods to assist the classification, especially in the prenatal setting.

A study of normal copy number variations in Israeli population.

The population of Israel is ethnically diverse, and individuals from different ethnic groups share specific genetic variations. These variations, which have been passed on from common ancestors, are usually reported in public databases as rare variants. Here, we aimed to identify ethnicity-based benign copy number variants (CNVs) and generate the first Israeli CNV database. We applied a data-mining approach to the results of 10,193 chromosomal microarray tests, of which 2150 tests were from individuals of 13 common ethnic backgrounds (n ≥ 10). We found 165 CNV regions (> 50 kbp) that are unique to specific ethnic groups (uCNVRs). The frequency of more than 19% of these uCNVRs is between 1 and 20% of the common ethnic origin, while their frequency in the overall cohort is between 0.5 and 1.6%. Of these 165 uCNVRs, 98 are reported as variants of unknown significance or as not available in dbVar; we postulate that these uCNVRs should be annotated as either "likely benign" or "benign". The ethnic-specific CNVs extracted in this study will allow geneticists to distinguish between relevant pathogenic genomic aberrations and benign ethnicity-related variations, thus preventing variant misinterpretation that may lead to unnecessary pregnancy terminations.

Should We Report 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Deletions and Duplications in the Prenatal Setting?

Copy number variations of the 15q11.2 region at breakpoints 1-2 (BP1-BP2) have been associated with variable phenotypes and low penetrance. Detection of such variations in the prenatal setting can result in significant parental anxiety. The clinical significance of pre- and postnatally detected 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletions and duplications was assessed. Of 11,004 chromosomal microarray tests performed in a single referral lab (7596 prenatal, 3408 postnatal), deletions were detected in 66 cases: 39 in prenatal tests (0.51%) and 27 in postnatal tests (0.79%). Duplications were detected in 94 cases: 62 prenatal tests (0.82%) and 32 postnatal tests (0.94%). The prevalence of deletions and duplications among clinically indicated prenatal tests (0.57% and 0.9%, respectively) did not differ significantly in comparison to unindicated tests (0.49% and 0.78%, respectively). The prevalence of deletions and duplications among postnatal tests performed for clinical indications was similar to the prevalence in healthy individuals (0.73% and 1% vs. 0.98% and 0.74%, respectively). The calculated penetrance of deletions and duplications over the background risk was 2.18% and 1.16%, respectively. We conclude that the pathogenicity of 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 deletions and duplications is low. Opting out the report of these copy number variations to both clinicians and couples should be considered.

Based on a cohort of 52,879 microarrays, recurrent intragenic FBN2 deletion encompassing exons 1-8 does not cause Beals syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA) is a rare connective tissue disorder, associated with heterozygous mutations in the FBN2 gene. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of an intragenic deletion encompassing exons 1-8 of FBN2 gene in Israeli population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search for intragenic FBN2 microdeletions was performed in two databases of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) - genetic laboratory of a tertiary medical center (the primary cohort) and one of the largest Israeli health maintenance organizations (replication cohort). RESULTS: Overall, 52,879 microarray tests were searched for FBN2 microdeletions. The primary cohort constituted of 18,301 CMA tests, among which 33 intragenic FBN2 microdeletions in unrelated individuals were found (0.18%). Prenatal prevalence of this variant was 0.23% (28/12,604), and specifically in low risk pregnancies - 0.29% (22/7464). Of the 28 cases with known parental origin, 27 (96.4%) were of full or partial Ashkenazi Jewish ethnic background. The approximate allele incidence in the Ashkenazi Jewish origin was 0.4% (18/4961). Combined with the 34,578 CMA tests in the replication cohort, the overall frequency of FBN2 microdeletions was 0.24% (125/52,879). None of the pre- or postnatal cases had any clinical manifestations of CCA. DISCUSSION: Intragenic FBN2 microdeletions are found in one of every 420 CMA analyses in Israeli population, and in particular one of every 340 low-risk pregnancies. Due to high allele incidence in Ashkenazi Jewish population (1:275), we suggest that FBN2 gene deletion detected by CMA among Ashkenazi Jews should be interpreted as benign copy number variant.

When genotype is not predictive of phenotype: implications for genetic counseling based on 21,594 chromosomal microarray analysis examinations.

PurposeTo compare the frequency of copy-number variants (CNVs) of variable penetrance in low-risk and high-risk prenatal samples and postnatal samples.MethodsTwo cohorts were categorized according to chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) indication: group I, low-risk prenatal-women with uneventful pregnancy (control group); group II, high-risk prenatal-women whose fetuses had congenital malformations; and group III, postnatal-individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, or multiple congenital anomalies. CNVs were categorized based on clinical penetrance: (i) high (>40%), (ii) moderate (10-40%), and (iii) low (<10%).ResultsFrom 2013 to 2016, 21,594 CMAs were performed. The frequency of high-penetrance CNVs was 0.1% (21/15,215) in group I, 0.9% (26/2,791) in group II, and 2.6% (92/3,588) in group III. Moderate-penetrance CNV frequency was 0.3% (47/15,215), 0.6% (19/2,791), and 1.2% (46/3,588), respectively. These differences were statistically significant. The frequency of low-penetrance CNVs was not significantly different among groups: 0.6% (85/15,215), 0.9% (25/2,791), and 1.0% (35/3,588), respectively.ConclusionHigh-penetrance CNVs might be a major factor in the overall heritability of developmental, intellectual, and structural anomalies. Low-penetrance CNV alone does not seem to contribute to these anomalies. These data may assist pre- and posttest CMA counseling.

Cytogenetic analysis in fetuses with late onset abnormal sonographic findings.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of chromosomal cytogenetic abnormalities in fetuses with late onset abnormal sonographic findings. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of women who underwent amniocentesis at or beyond 23 weeks of gestation, for fetal karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis, indicated due to late onset abnormal sonographic findings. RESULTS: All 103 fetuses had a normal karyotype. Ninety-five women also had chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) performed. The detection rate of abnormal CMA (5/95, 5.3%) was similar to that of women who underwent amniocentesis due to abnormal early onset ultrasound findings detected at routine prenatal screening tests during the first or early second trimester (7.3%, P=0.46) and significantly higher than that for women who underwent amniocentesis and CMA upon request, without a medical indication for CMA (0.99%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Late onset sonographic findings are an indication for amniocentesis, and if performed, CMA should be applied to evaluate fetuses with late onset abnormal sonographic findings.