True peristaltic recovery is uncommon following treatment, particularly endoscopic dilation for achalasia cardia, though pseudo-recovery often occurs.

BACKGROUND: Relieving esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction has been the focus of treatment for achalasia cardia. The recovery of peristalsis has been an elusive goal. Studies analyzing post-intervention peristaltic recovery have several limitations such as the use of conventional manometry or lack of standard definitions of peristalsis. Accordingly, we undertook this study to analyze frequency and pattern of peristaltic recovery following treatment for achalasia cardia on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and standard Chicago definition of peristalsis. METHODS: Pre and post-intervention HRM records of 71 treatment-naive patients diagnosed as achalasia cardia were retrospectively analyzed. Records with pre and post-intervention HRM on different systems (e.g. solid state and water perfusion) and those with inadequate information were excluded. All HRMs were interpreted as per Chicago classification version 3.0. After pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), pseudorecovery of peristalsis was defined as any contraction at least 3 cm in length along 20 mmHg isobaric contour with a distal latency of less than 4.5 seconds. True recovery and premature contractions were defined by standard Chicago classification v3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Change in diagnosis was observed in 38 of 71 (53.5%) patients after intervention. While pseudo-peristaltic recovery occurred in 11 of 71 (15.5%) patients, only three (4.2%) had a true recovery. Another nine (12.7%) patients showed new premature contractions. CONCLUSION: True peristaltic recovery is uncommon in achalasia cardia following intervention, particularly PD. Pseudo-peristaltic recovery is more common. Further research is warranted on this issue.

Twenty-four-hour pH metry alone is inferior to additional impedance monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, particularly in presence of reduced gastric acid secretion.

BACKGROUND: Current gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is 24-hour pH metry though it fails to detect non-acidic reflux. The sensitivity of 24-hour pH metry alone (both catheter-based and Bravo capsule) is questionable, especially if gastric acid secretion is low due to reduced parietal cell mass, Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric atrophy and antisecretory therapy. Accordingly, we analyzed the diagnostic ability of 24-hour pH metry as compared to impedance monitoring in relation to the gastric pH without antisecretory therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 150 patients with suspected GERD undergoing a 24-hour pH impedance study was done. RESULTS: Among 150 patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, 106 (70.6%) had confirmed GERD diagnosed either by 24-hour pH metry alone (10 [9.4%]), impedance monitoring alone (49 [46.2%]) or both (47 [44.3%]). Abnormal reflux of acidic and non-acidic gastric contents was detected by 24-hour pH metry and 24-hour impedance monitoring in 57/106 (53.7%) and 96/106 (90.5%) of patients, respectively (p < .00001). Patients with GERD diagnosed by 24-hour impedance monitoring had a higher mean gastric pH (2.9 [median 1.3, IQR 5.3]) than those diagnosed by 24-hour pH metry (2.1 [median 1.4, IQR 2.6]) or both (1.6 [median 1.2, IQR 2.1]) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Twenty-four-hour impedance monitoring detects GERD more often than 24-hour pH metry. Patients with higher mean gastric pH leading to non-acidic reflux were more often diagnosed by 24-hour impedance monitoring than 24-hour pH metry. Thus, 24-hour pH metry alone is inferior to additional impedance monitoring in the diagnosis of GERD, particularly in presence of reduced gastric acid secretion.

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Though small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is known in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the data on it are scanty and have limitations. METHODS: Data on IBD patients undergoing glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of SIBO in IBD compared to 66 healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients with IBD (n=86; 45 ulcerative colitis [UC] and 41 Crohn's disease [CD]) more often had SIBO on GHBT than the healthy subjects (16/86 [18.6%] vs. 1/66 [1.5%]; p=0.002). SIBO was commoner among patients with CD than UC (14/41 [34.1%] vs. 2/45 [4.4%]; p=0.001). The frequency of SIBO among UC patients was comparable to healthy subjects (2/45 [4.4%] vs. 1/66 [1.5%]; p=not significant [NS]). Patients with CD than those with UC had higher values of maximum breath hydrogen and a greater area under the curve for breath hydrogen. Other factors associated with SIBO included female gender (11/16 [68.8%] with vs. 21/70 [30%] without SIBO; p=0.003), and having undergone surgery (8/16 [50%] vs. 6/70 [8.6%]; p=0.0002). SIBO patients had lower levels of total serum protein and albumin than those without SIBO (6.2 ± 1.5 g/dL vs. 7.0 ± 0.9 g/dL, respectively; p=0.009 and 3.5 ± 0.9 g/dL vs. 4.0 ± 0.6 g/dL, respectively; p=0.02). CD, female gender, and surgery for IBD tended to be the independent factors associated with SIBO among IBD patients on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD, particularly CD, female, and those having undergone surgery, have a higher risk of SIBO than the healthy controls.