Associations between the circumstances and severity of head impacts in men's university ice hockey.

Improved evidence on the most common and severe types of head impacts in ice hockey can guide efforts to preserve brain health through improvements in protective gear, rink design, player training, and rules of play. In this observational cohort study of men's university hockey, we compared video evidence on the circumstances of 234 head impacts to measures of head impact severity (peak linear accelerations and rotational velocities) from helmet-mounted sensors (GForceTracker). Videos were analyzed with a validated questionnaire, and paired with helmet sensor data. Shoulder-to-head impacts were more common than hand- or elbow-, but there were no differences in head impact severity between upper limb contact sites (p ≥ 0.2). Head-to-glass impacts were nearly four times more common, and just as severe as head-to-board impacts (p ≥ 0.4). Head impacts resulting in major penalties (versus no penalty), or visible signs of concussion (versus no signs), involved greater head rotational velocities (p = 0.038 and 0.049, respectively). Head impacts occurred most often to the side of the head, along the boards to players in their offensive zone without puck possession. Head impact severity did not differ between cases where the head was (versus was not) the primary site of contact (p ≥ 0.6). Furthermore, penalties were called in only 4% of cases where the head was the initial point of contact. Accordingly, rules that focus on primary targeting of the head, while important and in need of improved enforcement, offer a limited solution.

Circumstances of Falls During Sit-to-Stand Transfers in Older People: A Cohort Study of Video-Captured Falls in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the circumstances of falls during sit-to-stand transfers in long-term care (LTC), including the frequency, direction, stepping and grasping responses, and injury risk, based on video analysis of real-life falls. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: LTC. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed video footage of 306 real-life falls by 183 LTC residents that occurred during sit-to-stand transfers, collected from 2007 to 2020. The mean age was 83.7 years (SD=9.0 years), and 93 were female (50.8%). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used Generalized Estimating Equations to test for differences in the odds that a resident would fall at least once during the rising vs stabilization phases of sit-to-stand and to test the association between the phase of the transfer when the fall occurred (rising vs stabilization) and the following outcomes: (1) the initial fall direction; (2) the occurrence, number, and direction of stepping responses; (3) grasping of environmental supports; and (4) documented injury. RESULTS: Falls occurred twice as often in the rising phase than in the stabilization phase of the transfer (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively). Falls during rising were more often directed backward, while falls during stabilization were more likely to be sideways (odds ratio [OR]=1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07-3.55). Falls during rising were more often accompanied by grasping responses, while falls during stabilization were more likely to elicit stepping responses (grasping: OR=0.30; 95% CI=0.14-0.64; stepping: OR=8.29; 95% CI=4.54-15.11). Injuries were more likely for falls during the stabilization phase than the rising phase of the transfer (OR=1.73; 95% CI=1.04-2.87). CONCLUSION: Most falls during sit-to-stand transfers occurred from imbalance during the rising phase of the transfer. However, falls during the subsequent stabilization phase were more likely to cause injury.

Effective stiffness, damping and mass of the body during laboratory simulations of shoulder checks in ice hockey.

Ice hockey is a fast-paced sport with a high incidence of collisions between players. Shoulder checks are especially common, accounting for a large portion of injuries including concussions. The forces generated during these collisions depend on the inertial and viscoelastic characteristics of the impacting bodies. Furthermore, the effect of shoulder pads in reducing peak force depends on the baseline (unpadded) properties of the shoulder. We conducted experiments with nine men's ice hockey players (aged 19-26) to measure their effective shoulder stiffness, damping and mass during the impact stage of a shoulder check. Participants delivered a style of check commonly observed in men's university ice hockey, involving lateral impact to the deltoid region, with the shoulder brought stationary by the collision. The effective stiffness and damping coefficient of the shoulder averaged 12.8 kN/m and 377 N-s/m at 550 N, and the effective mass averaged 47% of total body mass. The damping coefficient and stiffness increased with increasing force, but there was no significant difference in the damping coefficient above 350 N. Our results provide new evidence on the dynamics of shoulder checks in ice hockey, as a starting point for designing test systems for evaluating and improving the protective value of shoulder pads.

American society of biomechanics journal of biomechanics award 2019: Circumstances of head impacts in men's university ice hockey.

This observational study examined the circumstances of head impacts in men's university ice hockey. Video footage was collected of 449 head impacts experienced by 37 players over 33 games. Videos were analyzed using a reliable, structured questionnaire to classify: playing zone, location on ice, puck possession, direction of gaze, object striking the head, location of head impact, trajectory of colliding players, and penalties. Generalized Linear Models were used to compare response categories for the proportion of players experiencing at least one head impact, and the number of head impacts per player. The majority of events resulting in head impact involved contact with another player (93%). Head impacts occurred most often to players who did not have puck possession, who were checked along the boards in their offensive zone. Players were just as likely to experience head impact with an environmental object, as with an opposing player's body part. Glass-to-head impacts represented 30% of cases, four times as common as board-to-head impacts. Hand-to-head impacts accounted for 23% of cases, twice as common as shoulder- or elbow-to-head impacts. In 27% of events, there were two or more successive impacts to the head (e.g., contact with shoulder and then boards). Only 16% of head impacts which involved contact with another player resulted in infractions. Our results support the need for additional research on the benefits of stricter rule enforcement, and modifications to the stiffness of glass and padding of gloves, for reducing the frequency and severity of head impacts in ice hockey.

A comparison of the magnitude and duration of linear and rotational head accelerations generated during hand-, elbow- and shoulder-to-head checks delivered by hockey players.

Ice hockey has the highest rates for concussion among team sports in Canada. In elite play, the most common mechanism is impact to the head by an opposing player's upper limb, with shoulder-to-head impacts accounting for twice as many concussions as elbow- and hand-to-head impacts combined. Improved understanding of the biomechanics of head impacts in hockey may inform approaches to prevention. In this study, we measured the magnitude and duration of linear and rotational head accelerations when hockey players (n = 11; aged 21-25) delivered checks "as hard as comfortable" to the head of an instrumented dummy with their shoulder, elbow and hand. There were differences in both peak magnitude and duration of head accelerations across upper limb impact sites, based on repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.005). Peak linear head accelerations averaged 1.9-fold greater for hand and 1.3-fold greater for elbow than shoulder (mean values = 20.35, 14.23 and 10.55 g, respectively). Furthermore, peak rotational head accelerations averaged 2.1-fold greater for hand and 1.8-fold greater for elbow than shoulder (1097.9, 944.1 and 523.1 rad/s2, respectively). However, times to peak linear head acceleration (a measure of the duration of the acceleration impulse) were 2.1-fold longer for shoulder than elbow, and 2.5-fold longer for shoulder than hand (12.26, 5.94 and 4.98 ms, respectively), and there were similar trends in the durations of rotational head acceleration. Our results show that, in body checks to the head delivered by varsity-level hockey players, shoulder-to-head impacts generated longer durations but lower magnitude of peak head acceleration than elbow- and hand-to-head impacts.