Ankle strength assessed by one repetition maximum: A new approach to detect weaknesses in chronic ankle lateral instability.

BACKGROUND: Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach. METHODS: We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI. RESULTS: The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.

Foot and Ankle Muscle Isometric Strength in Nonrearfoot Compared With Rearfoot Endurance Runners.

Background: Transitioning to a forefoot strike pattern can be used to manage running-related knee injuries. However, adopting a nonrearfoot strike induces a higher load on foot and ankle structures than rearfoot strike. Sufficient foot muscle strength is also necessary to prevent excessive longitudinal arch (LA) deformation when running with nonrearfoot strike. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences in foot-ankle muscle strength between RF and NRF runners. Methods: A cross-sectional study including 40 RF and 40 NRF runners was conducted. The foot posture and the maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) of 6 foot-ankle muscles were measured. The footstrike pattern was determined using a 2-D camera during a self-paced run on a treadmill. Results: NRF had higher MVIS for ankle plantar flexor (+12.5%, P = .015), ankle dorsiflexor (+17.7%, P = .01), hallux flexor (+11%, P = .04), and lesser toe flexor (+20.8%, P = .0031). We found a small positive correlation between MVIS of ankle plantar flexor with MVIS of hallux flexor (r = 0.26; P = .01) and lesser toe flexor (r = 0.28; P = .01). Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we found that NRF runners on average have a higher MVIS of hallux and lesser toe flexor compared with RF runners. NRF runners also have a higher MVIS of ankle plantar flexor and dorsiflexor than RF runners. We found only a small correlation between ankle plantar flexor and foot muscle strength. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.

Survey of physicians' and physiotherapists' ankle muscle strength assessment practices for safe return to sports after lateral ankle sprain: A short report.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ankle muscle strength is an important criterion to consider and assess for return to play (RTP) after lateral ankle sprain (LAS). This study therefore focuses on the reported ankle muscle strength consideration for RTP by physicians and physiotherapists, both clinicians involved in RTP decisions, and how they assess it in daily practice. The primary aim is to compare reported clinical practice on ankle muscle strength evaluation between physicians and physiotherapists. Our secondary aims are: to assess the prevalence of use of qualitative versus quantitative assessment and; to determine if there are any differences in how clinicians with or without a Sports Medicine or Physiotherapy Education approach this assessment. METHODS: A survey on RTP criteria after LAS was completed by 109 physicians in a previous study. A number of 103 physiotherapists completed the same survey. A comparison between clinicians' answers was realized and additional questions on ankle muscle strength were analysed. RESULTS: Physiotherapists consider ankle strength for RTP more than physicians (p < 0.001). A large majority of physicians (93%) and physiotherapists (92%) reported assessing ankle strength manually and less than 10% use a dynamometer. Physicians and physiotherapists with Sports Medicine or Physiotherapy Education selected more quantitative assessment than those without (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Despite being recognized as an important criterion, ankle muscle strength is not always part of the RTP criteria after LAS in daily practice. The dynamometers are scarcely used by physicians and physiotherapists, whereas it could accurately quantify ankle strength deficits. Sports Medicine or Physiotherapy Education increases the use of quantitative ankle strength assessments by clinicians.

Current practice for safe return-to-play after lateral ankle sprain: A survey among French-speaking physicians.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations are available for assessment criteria for safe return-to-play (RTP) after a lateral ankle sprain. However, their current use among physicians is unknown. METHODS: French-speaking physicians in Belgium, France and Switzerland were asked to complete an online survey and report their clinical assessment of selected RTP criteria. RESULTS: The respondent sample (n=109) included physicians with and without Sports Medicine education, varied level of experience and proportion of athletes in their practice population. Pain was the most selected criterion for safe RTP (90% of physicians), followed by ability to engage in functional tasks (82%), functional instability (73%), range of motion (61%), proprioception (47%), mechanical instability (39%), strength (38%) and swelling (31%). A low proportion of physicians use quantitative measures to assess these criteria (between 4% and 53%). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of physicians consider the recommended criteria for RTP decisions. However, physicians do not frequently use quantitative measures.