Declines in serum uric acid level after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined whether catheter ablation for AF patients improves biomarkers other than serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and renal function. This study was to explore whether catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients affects uric acid (UA), glucose and lipid metabolism. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (66.6 ± 10.4 years; 132 men) who underwent initial AF ablation without changes to oral medications were included. Baseline BNP and UA levels significantly decreased at 1 year after ablation (p < 0.05 each). Changes in UA level correlated significantly with pre-procedural UA level (r = 0.57). In multivariable logistic regression modeling, pre-procedural UA level, persistent AF, and hemoglobin A1c (p < 0.05 each) were independent predictors of post-procedural UA level decline. Significant improvements in both persistent and paroxysmal AF patients were identified, and the magnitude of post-procedural serum UA level decline after ablation (ΔUA) was significantly greater in patients with persistent AF (0.8 ± 1.0 mg/dl) than in those with paroxysmal AF (0.2 ± 0.8 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Of the 48 patients with high UA level before procedure, 28 patients showed improvement in UA level to normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation for AF patients significantly improved serum UA levels without obvious influences of heart failure, renal function, or inflammation, suggesting that AF ablation may be effective for AF patients with hyperuricemia. Trial registration The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of University of Fukui (no. 20210132) and clinical trial registration (UMIN000044669).

Significance of day-to-day glucose variability in patients after acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have recently addressed the importance of glycemic variability (GV) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although daily GV measures, such as mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, are established predictors of poor prognosis in patients with ACS, the clinical significance of day-to-day GV remains to be fully elucidated. We therefore monitored day-to-day GV in patients with ACS to examine its significance. METHODS: In 25 patients with ACS, glucose levels were monitored for 14 days using a flash continuous glucose monitoring system. Mean of daily differences (MODD) was calculated as a marker of day-to-day GV. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was evaluated within 4 days after hospitalization. Cardiac function (left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume) was assessed by echocardiography at 3-5 days after admission and at 10-12 months after the disease onset. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients, 8 (32%) were diagnosed with diabetes, and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based MODD was high (16.6 to 42.3) in 17 patients (68%). Although MODD did not correlate with max creatine kinase (CK), there was a positive correlation between J-index, high blood glucose index, and NT-proBNP (r = 0.83, p < 0.001; r = 0.85, p < 0.001; r = 0.41, p = 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS, MODD was associated with elevated NT-proBNP. Future studies should investigate whether day-to-day GV in ACS patients can predict adverse clinical events such as heart failure.

Cardiac rehabilitation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent AF ablation. We explored the feasibility of additional cardiac rehabilitation after AF ablation in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Fifty-four patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced LVEF (HFrEF) (LVEF < 50%; 67.1 ± 11.6 years; 43 men) who underwent initial AF ablation procedures were included. Fourteen (25.9%) patients underwent cardiac rehabilitation (rehabilitation-group) and the remaining 40 (74.1%) did not (non-rehabilitation-group) after the procedure. The rehabilitation-group patients were relatively older, more likely female (p = 0.024), and had more likely a history of an HF hospitalization (p < 0.01) and cardiac device implantation (p = 0.041). The baseline LVEF was significantly lower (p = 0.043) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (p < 0.01) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.01) values were significantly higher in the rehabilitation-group. The 6-min walk distance significantly improved after 21.4 ± 11.5 days of cardiac rehabilitation during hospitalization (226.1 ± 155.9 vs. 398.1 ± 77.5 m, p = 0.016) without any adverse events. During an 18.9 ± 6.3 month follow-up period, the freedom from AF recurrence (p = 0.52) and re-hospitalizations due to HF (p = 0.63) were similar between the 2 groups. No death or strokes were observed. During the follow-up period, the LVEF significantly improved similarly in both groups, and the change in the BNP and CRP values significantly decreased in the rehabilitation-group. Despite the rehabilitation-group patients having a more severe HF status, the clinical outcomes and AF freedom were similar between the 2 groups, suggesting the favorable impact of cardiac rehabilitation after AF ablation in HFrEF patients.

Feasibility of Uninterrupted Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Temporary Switching to Dabigatran ("Dabigatran Bridge") for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation minimizes the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events. Although the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has rapidly developed in patients undergoing AF ablation, no antidote is available for factor Xa inhibitors. We sought to investigate the feasibility of an uninterrupted DOAC protocol with temporary switching to dabigatran ("dabigatran bridge") for AF ablation.The study consisted of consecutive 137 patients in whom DOACs were interrupted on the procedural day with heparin bridging (interrupted group) and 135 in whom DOACs were uninterrupted with temporary switching to dabigatran during the periprocedural hospitalization period ("dabigatran bridge" group). The coagulation markers were measured just before and after the ablation procedure. The adverse events during and up to 8 weeks after the procedure were compared according to the definition of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis.The patients were significantly older in the "dabigatran bridge" group; however, the other baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of all adverse events was comparable between the two groups (8/137 versus 8/135, P = 0.96); however, one patient from the interrupted group experienced stroke, and another from the "dabigatran bridge" group experienced cardiac tamponade, which was safely managed with an antidote. In the "dabigatran bridge" group, the activated partial thromboplastin time was significantly longer, and coagulation markers (soluble fibrin monomer and thrombin-antithrombin complexes) were significantly lower than in the interrupted group before ablation.The "dabigatran bridge" seems to be a reasonable anticoagulation protocol to minimize the thromboembolic risk while ensuring safety in patients undergoing AF ablation and taking factor Xa inhibitors.