Relation of Prolonged Pacemaker Dependency After Cardiac Surgery to Mortality.

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) represents a rare complication after cardiac surgery, with no uniform agreement on timing and no information on follow-up. A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess pacemaker dependency (PMD) and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery procedures. Between 2004 and 2016, PPI-patients from 18 centers were followed. Time-to-event data were evaluated with semiparametric regression Cox models and semiparametric Fine and Gray model for competing risk framework. Of 859 (0.90%) PPI-patients, 30% were pacemaker independent (PMI) at 6 months. PMD showed higher mortality compared with PMI (10-year survival 80.1% ± 2.6% and 92.2% +2.4%, respectively, log-rank p-value < 0.001) with an unadjusted hazard ratio for death of 0.36 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.65, p< 0.001 favoring PMI) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.45, p< 0.001 with PMD as reference). Crude cumulative incidence function of restored PMI rhythm at follow-up at 6 months, 1 year and 12 years were 30.5% (95% CI 27.3% to 33.7%), 33.7% (95% CI 30.4% to 36.9%) and 37.2% (95% CI 33.8% to 40.6%) respectively. PMI was favored by preoperative sinus rhythm with normal conduction (SR) (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.40, p< 0.001), whereas coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement were independently associated with PMD (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88, p = 0.006 and HR 0.807, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.99, p = 0.047 respectively). Time-to-implantation was not associated with increased rate of PMI. Although 30% of PPI-patients are PMI after 6 months, PMD is associated with higher mortality at long term.

Long-term screening for sleep apnoea in paced patients: preliminary assessment of a novel patient management flowchart by using automatic pacemaker indexes and sleep lab polygraphy.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this pilot study was to prospectively assess a flowchart to screen and diagnose paced patients (pts) affected by sleep apnoeas, by crosschecking indexes derived from pacemakers (minute ventilation sensor on-board) with Sleep-Lab Polygraphy (PG) outcomes. Secondarily, "smoothed" long-term pacemaker indexes (all the information between two consecutive follow-up visits) have been retrospectively compared vs. standard short-term pacemaker indexes (last 24h) at each follow-up (FU) visit, to test their correlation and diagnostic concordance. METHODS: Data from long-term FU of 61 paced pts were collected. At each visit, the standard short-term apnoea+hypopnoea (PM_AHI) index was retrieved from the pacemaker memory. Patients showing PM_AHI ≥ 30 at least once during FU were proposed to undergo a PG for diagnostic confirmation. Smoothed pacemaker (PM_SAHI) indexes were calculated by averaging the overall number of apnoeas/hypopnoeas over the period between two FU visits, and retrospectively compared with standard PM_AHI. RESULTS: Data were available from 609 consecutive visits (overall 4.64 ± 1.78 years FU). PM_AHI indexes were positive during FU in 40/61 pts (65.6%); 26/40 pts (65%) accepted to undergo a PG recording; Sleep-Lab confirmed positivity in 22/26 pts (84.6% positive predictive value for PM_AHI). A strong correlation (r=0.73) and a high level of concordance were found between smoothed and standard indexes (multivariate analysis, Cohen's-k and Z-score tests). CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker-derived indexes may help in screening paced pts potentially affected by sleep apnoeas. Long-term "smoothed" apnoea indexes could improve the accuracy of pacemaker screening capability, even though this hypothesis must be prospectively confirmed by larger studies.

Optimizing pacemaker longevity with pacing mode and settings programming: results from a pacemaker multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the influence on dual-chamber devices' expected longevity of devices' settings. METHODS: Data from patients implanted with dual chamber devices (Symphony™, SORIN CRM SAS, Clamart, France) from 2003 to 2006 were collected in registries. Programmer files were retrieved: device-estimated longevity, assessed through algorithm prediction, was analyzed according to device settings. RESULTS: One thousand sixty-eight recipients of dual chamber pacemaker in sinus rhythm (75.3±11.1 years, 54.5% male, ventricular block 30%, brady-tachy syndrome 21%, and sinus node dysfunction 49%) were followed up to 14.2±12.1 months (ranging from first quartile Q1: 2.9 months to fourth quartile Q4: 49.3 months) after implantation. DDD with automatic mode conversion and minimized ventricular pacing (SafeR) modes were programmed in 34.3%, 2.9%, and 62.8% of the patients, respectively. The mean total longevity estimated by the device was 134.1±31.5 months (11.2±2.6 years). Significant increase in longevity was observed in devices undergoing at least one reprogramming (134.4±31.4 months) versus device presenting no reprogramming (103.4±32.3 months, P=0.0005). The parameters associated with the major increase in mean longevity were the mode (mean longevity increase of +23.9 months in SafeR as compared to DDD mode, P<0.0001) and the atrial (A) and ventricular (V) amplitudes (mean longevity increase of +29.6 and +26.9 months for a decrease of less than 1V in A and V outputs respectively, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides information on dual chamber pacemakers' longevity and highlights the impact of devices' reprogramming on expected longevities.

Rationale and design of the OPTION study: optimal antitachycardia therapy in ICD patients without pacing indications.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent the treatment of choice for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death but ICD therapy is also plagued by inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Dual-chamber (DC) ICDs are considered to exhibit an enhanced discrimination performance in comparison to single-chamber (SC) ICDs, which results in reduction of inappropriate detections in a short- to mid-term follow-up. Comparative data on long-term follow-up and especially on inappropriate shocks are limited. METHODS: The aim of the OPTION study is to assess whether an optimized treatment with DC ICDs improves patient outcome and decreases the rate of inappropriate shocks in comparison to SC ICDs. DC ICD therapy optimization is achieved by optimal customizing of antitachycardia therapy parameters, activation of discrimination algorithms, antitachycardia pacing in the slow ventricular tachycardia zone, and avoidance of right ventricular pacing with the SafeR algorithm mode. The OPTION study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel study, will randomize 450 patients on a 1:1 allocation to either an SC arm with backup pacing at VVI 40 beats per minute (bpm) or to the DC arm with SafeR pacing at 60 bpm. Patients will be followed for 27 months. Primary outcome measure is the time to first occurrence of inappropriate shock and a combined endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: The study will evaluate the relative performance of DC in comparison to SC ICDs in terms of inappropriate shock reduction and patient outcome.