Prevalence of leakage and its negative impact on quality of life in people living with a stoma in the UK.

BACKGROUND: People with a stoma are reported to experience leakage, which negatively impacts patient quality of life (QoL). AIM: To assess the impact of leakage experienced by individuals with a stoma in the UK. METHODS: Data were analysed from 301 patients living in the UK who completed a questionnaire concerning the physical and psychosocial impact of living with a stoma. FINDINGS: Most respondents had had their stoma for more than 5 years. Nine out of 10 worried about leakage to varying degrees and half the respondents accepted that this was a worry they had to live with. Almost 70% experienced leakage onto clothes within the preceding year, and 28% experienced this monthly. Peristomal skin complications were experienced by 82% of respondents, the severity of which correlated with reductions in QoL. CONCLUSION: Despite the consequential negative impact of leakage on QoL, individuals are not seeking advice to resolve leakage-related issues, including from their specialist stoma care nurse.

Sensitivity and missed cancer rate in the symptomatic breast clinic-A retrospective cohort study of 40 323 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic presentations account for the majority of invasive breast cancer diagnoses. While the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme is subjected to strict quality control, no such system for performance monitoring exists in the symptomatic clinic. We assess the sensitivity of cancer detection and missed cancer rate for symptomatic breast patients to benchmark future outcome measures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients attending the symptomatic breast clinic between October 2013 and October 2018 was performed. Patients with new cancer diagnoses were identified and screened for those who had presented to the department within the 3 years prior to their diagnosis. From this, the sensitivity and missed cancer rate were calculated. RESULTS: About 40 323 patients were seen over the 5-year study period. About 2155 new cancers were diagnosed, with 2033 identified at their initial clinic attendance. A further 122 patients had cancer diagnosed on a subsequent appointment, of which 23 patients were considered to have had a delay in diagnosis. The sensitivity of the one-stop symptomatic breast clinic was therefore 99.0%, and the missed cancer rate was 0.06% over 5 years. CONCLUSION: The missed cancer rate reported in this study is favorable compared to the outcomes reported in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme and superior to the only other study reporting outcomes on a much smaller cohort. The unit in question therefore is performing exceptionally against current standards and sets a benchmark against which future performance can be measured.

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction on a Day-case Mastectomy Pathway for Breast Cancer Versus a Traditional Inpatient Delivery Model, Using a Validated Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, a guidance was issued by the National Health Service (NHS) Improvement a model on how mastectomy could be offered in the day-case setting. The goal of this guidance was to reduce inpatient bed days and cost to the NHS, and demonstrate that it can be performed within an acceptable safety profile. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients find the day-case pathway for mastectomy an acceptable management model. We compared complication rates between the day-case and inpatient delivery model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients' experience undergoing day-case (n=26) and inpatient mastectomy (n=60). The primary outcome measure was based on a telephone interview using a validated, standardised questionnaire. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the satisfaction levels between the two groups (raw scores 6.76 day-case vs. 6.15 inpatient, p=0.37) was demonstrated. We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups when specifically analysing whether patients found the first night harder as a day-case or inpatient (3.192 vs. 2.80, p=0.59, range 0-10). Our overall complications were 11.4% (day-case) and 18.3% (inpatients). Rates were comparable between the two groups and equivalent to published rates in the literature. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction scores between patients who had a mastectomy as an inpatient versus those who had their operation as a day-case procedure. In addition, there were no significant differences in the complication rates between the two groups. We conclude then that it is feasible and safe to offer day-case mastectomy, with no loss in patient satisfaction.

Discussing Weight Management With Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Care Using the Small Talk Big Difference Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes universally recommend that adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity be offered individualized interventions to encourage weight loss. Yet despite the existing recommendations, provision of weight management services is currently patchy around the United Kingdom and where services are available, high attrition rates are often reported. In addition, individuals often fail to take up services, that is, after discussion with a general practitioner or practice nurse, individuals are referred to the service but do not attend for an appointment. Qualitative research has identified that the initial discussion raising the issue of weight, motivating the patient, and referring to services is crucial to a successful outcome from weight management. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an Internet-based training program and practice implementation toolkit with or without face-to-face training for primary care staff. The primary outcome is the change in referral rate of patients with type 2 diabetes to National Health Service adult weight management programs, 3 months pre- and postintervention. METHODS: We used the Behavior Change Wheel to develop an intervention for staff in primary care consisting of a 1-hour Internet-based eLearning package covering the links between obesity, type 2 diabetes, and the benefits of weight management, the treatment of diabetes in patients with obesity, specific training in raising the issue of weight, local services and referral pathways, overview of weight management components/ evidence base, and the role of the referrer. The package also includes a patient pamphlet, a discussion tool, a practice implementation checklist, and an optional 2.5-hour face-to-face training session. We have randomly assigned 100 practices in a 1:1 ratio to either have immediate access to all the resources or have access delayed for 4 months. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be performed. RESULTS: Recruitment to the study is now complete. We will finalize follow-up in 2018 and publish in early 2019. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol describes the development and randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates of weight management programs for adults with type 2 diabetes. At a time when many new dietary and pharmacological weight management interventions are showing large clinical benefits for people with type 2 diabetes, it is vital that primary care practitioners are willing, skilled, and able to discuss weight and make appropriate referrals to services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03360058; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03360058 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74HI8ULfn). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/12162.

The clinical impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z-0011 trial--results from the BreastSurgANZ National Breast Cancer Audit.

INTRODUCTION: The publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z-0011 Trial concluded that axillary lymph node clearance is no longer necessary for women having breast conserving treatment with 1-2 positive axillary sentinel lymph glands. The current study was designed to investigate the clinical impact of the Z-0011 Trial in breast surgical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BreastSurgANZ National Breast Cancer Audit database was interrogated for women treated between 2005 and 2010 who would have met the entry criteria for the Z-0011 Trial. This group was then calculated as a proportion of the total breast cancer episodes treated during this period. RESULTS: A total of 64,883 cases of breast cancer were eligible for analysis. 22,731 underwent breast conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy for invasive breast cancer. A total of 4482 cases (6.9%) fulfilled the criteria for Z-11 Trial. CONCLUSION: Although the ACOSOG Z-0011 Trial has important implications for sentinel node positive cases undergoing breast conserving treatment, the overall impact of the Trial in breast clinical practice is small. It cannot be described as "practice changing". Women who fulfil the entry criteria for the Z-0011 Trial should be informed of the clinical relevance of the trial and be permitted to participate in informed discussions with members of the multidisciplinary team regarding their treatment options.