Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 19870, 2019 12 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882690

RESUMEN

There is strong in vitro cell survival evidence that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. This is coupled with the growing in vivo evidence, from post-treatment image change analysis, of a variable RBE. Despite this, a constant RBE of 1.1 is still applied as a standard in proton therapy. However, there is a building clinical interest in incorporating a variable RBE. Recently, correlations summarising Monte Carlo-based mechanistic models of DNA damage and repair with absorbed dose and LET have been published as the Manchester mechanistic (MM) model. These correlations offer an alternative path to variable RBE compared to the more standard phenomenological models. In this proof of concept work, these correlations have been extended to acquire RBE-weighted dose distributions and calculated, along with other RBE models, on a treatment plan. The phenomenological and mechanistic models for RBE have been shown to produce comparable results with some differences in magnitude and relative distribution. The mechanistic model found a large RBE for misrepair, which phenomenological models are unable to do. The potential of the MM model to predict multiple endpoints presents a clear advantage over phenomenological models.


Asunto(s)
Daño del ADN/genética , Reparación del ADN/genética , Adulto , Algoritmos , Daño del ADN/fisiología , Reparación del ADN/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Transferencia Lineal de Energía/genética , Transferencia Lineal de Energía/fisiología , Método de Montecarlo , Adulto Joven
2.
RSC Adv ; 9(12): 6845-6858, 2019 Feb 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35518487

RESUMEN

Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE), the ratio of doses between radiation modalities to produce the same biological endpoint, is a controversial and important topic in proton therapy. A number of phenomenological models incorporate variable RBE as a function of Linear Energy Transfer (LET), though a lack of mechanistic description limits their applicability. In this work we take a different approach, using a track structure model employing fundamental physics and chemistry to make predictions of proton and photon induced DNA damage, the first step in the mechanism of radiation-induced cell death. We apply this model to a proton therapy clinical case showing, for the first time, predictions of DNA damage on a patient treatment plan. Our model predictions are for an idealised cell and are applied to an ependymoma case, at this stage without any cell specific parameters. By comparing to similar predictions for photons, we present a voxel-wise RBE of DNA damage complexity. This RBE of damage complexity shows similar trends to the expected RBE for cell kill, implying that damage complexity is an important factor in DNA repair and therefore biological effect.

3.
Phys Med Biol ; 58(19): 6915-29, 2013 Oct 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24029583

RESUMEN

We report on the design of Marvin, a Model Anatomy for Radiotherapy Verification and audit In the head and Neck and present results demonstrating its use in the development of the Elekta volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique at the Christie, and in the audit of TomoTherapy and Varian RapidArc at other institutions. The geometry of Marvin was generated from CT datasets of eight male and female patients lying in the treatment position, with removable inhomogeneities modelling the sinuses and mandible. A modular system allows the phantom to be used with a range of detectors, with the locations of the modules being based on an analysis of a range of typical treatment plans (27 in total) which were mapped onto the phantom geometry. Results demonstrate the use of Gafchromic EBT2/EBT3 film for measurement of relative dose in a plane through the target and organs-at-risk, and the use of a small-volume ionization chamber for measurement of absolute dose in the target and spinal cord. Measurements made during the development of the head and neck VMAT protocol at the Christie quantified the improvement in plan delivery resulting from the installation of the Elekta Integrity upgrade (which permits an effectively continuously variable dose rate), with plans delivered before and after the upgrade having 88.5 ± 9.4% and 98.0 ± 2.2% respectively of points passing a gamma analysis (at 4%, 4 mm, global). Audits of TomoTherapy and Varian RapidArc neck techniques at other institutions showed a similar quality of plan delivery as for post-Integrity Elekta VMAT: film measurements for both techniques had >99% of points passing a gamma analysis at the clinical criteria of 4%, 4 mm, global, and >95% of points passing at tighter criteria of 3%, 3 mm, global; and absolute dose measurements in the PTV and spinal cord were within 1.5% and 3.5% of the planned doses respectively for both techniques. The results demonstrate that Marvin is an efficient and effective means of assessing the quality of delivery of complex radiotherapy in the head and neck, and is a useful tool to assist development and audit of these techniques.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría/instrumentación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuello/efectos de la radiación , Faringe/efectos de la radiación
4.
Br J Radiol ; 85(1020): e1263-72, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23175492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We describe a model for evaluating the throughput capacity of a single-accelerator multitreatment room proton therapy centre with the aims of (1) providing quantitative estimates of the throughput and waiting times and (2) providing insight into the sensitivity of the system to various physical parameters. METHODS: A Monte Carlo approach was used to compute various statistics about the modelled centre, including the throughput capacity, fraction times for different groups of patients and beam waiting times. A method of quantifying the saturation level is also demonstrated. RESULTS: Benchmarking against the MD Anderson Cancer Center showed good agreement between the modelled (140 ± 4 fractions per day) and reported (133 ± 35 fractions per day) throughputs. A sensitivity analysis of that system studied the impact of beam switch time, the number of treatment rooms, patient set-up times and the potential benefit of having a second accelerator. Finally, scenarios relevant to a potential UK facility were studied, finding that a centre with the same four-room, single-accelerator configuration as the MD Anderson Cancer Center but handling a more complex UK-type caseload would have a throughput reduced by approximately 19%, but still be capable of treating in excess of 100 fractions per 16-h treatment day. CONCLUSIONS: The model provides a useful tool to aid in understanding the operating dynamics of a proton therapy facility, and for investigating potential scenarios for prospective centres. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The model helps to identify which technical specifications should be targeted for future improvements.


Asunto(s)
Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Protones/estadística & datos numéricos , Benchmarking/normas , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Montecarlo , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Listas de Espera , Carga de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA