Dexmedetomidine for awake craniotomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: For awake craniotomy, monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) had shown relatively lower failure rates. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the appropriate anaesthetic agents, and complications, has not been proposed. Therefore, the systematic review and meta-analysis was done to compare the clinical profile, surgical outcomes, and anesthesia-related complications between dexmedetomidine-based and non-dexmedetomidine regimens during monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for this procedure. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Published clinical trials described MAC, including the amount of anaesthetic drugs, or the number of patients for awake craniotomy between January 1st, 2009 and March 31st, 2022 were reviewed through PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and grey literature index. The standard methodological procedures were following the PRISMA statement with the PROSPERO registration. Twenty-two articles with 2,137 awake craniotomy patients identified as epilepsy surgery, deep brain stimulation procedure, and intracranial surgery closed to an eloquent area with intraoperative awakening for neuro-evaluation were included. The relative risk (RR) regarding surgical outcomes, and anaesthesia-related complications were compared. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Dexmedetomidine-based versus non-dexmedetomidine anaesthetic regimen revealed no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes (RR 1.08, 95 %CI 0.94-1.24), conversion to general anaesthesia (RR 0.45, 95 %CI 0.05-3.83), respiratory complications (RR 0.4, 95 %CI 0.12-1.27), and intraoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.30, 95 %CI 0.08-1.14). However, the intraoperative seizure was higher in non-dexmedetomidine group (RR 4.26, 95 %CI 1.49-12.16). CONCLUSION: MAC for awake craniotomy with dexmedetomidine seems to be effective and safe. Randomized controlled trials with standard protocol in specific group of patients and surgical interventions would further demonstrate a clear benefit of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy under MAC.

Incidence of complications associated with deep brain stimulation surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: An 8-year retrospective study.

Background: Various complications occur in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of complications in patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent DBS surgery and identify the risk factors, especially anesthetic factors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed between May 2015 and December 2022. Based on a review of medical charts, patients aged 18 years or older who underwent DBS surgery at a tertiary neurological center in Thailand were recruited. Univariate analysis using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was performed to compare patients with and without complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for complications. Results: The study included 46 patients. The most common complication during DBS electrode placement was hypertension (30/46, 65.2%), and 19 patients (41.3%) who developed hypertension did not receive antihypertensive treatment. The most common complication during battery placement was clinical hypotension (14/46, 30.4%). The most common postoperative complication was delirium (6/46, 13.0%). In the multivariate analysis, no significant independent risk factors for overall complications after DBS surgery were identified. Conclusions: Hypertension during DBS electrode insertion was the most common perioperative complication. Hemodynamic instability is preventable and manageable, and vigilant and prompt treatment should be provided during DBS surgery.

The dosage of thiopental as pharmacological cerebral protection during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective study.

Background: Thiopental has been used as a pharmacological cerebral protection strategy during carotid endarterectomy surgeries. However, the optimal dosage required to induce burst suppression on the electroencephalogram (EEG) remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal dosage of thiopental required to induce burst suppression during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy. Methods: The Neurological Institute of Thailand Review Board approved the study. Data were collected from 2009 to 2019 for all non-shunt carotid endarterectomy patients who received thiopental for pharmacological cerebral protection and had intraoperative EEG monitoring. Demographic information, carotid stenosis severity, intraoperative EEG parameters, thiopental dosage, carotid clamp time, intraoperative events, and patient outcomes were abstracted. Results: The study included 57 patients. Among them, 24 patients (42%) achieved EEG burst suppression pattern with a thiopental dosage of 26.3±10.1 mg/kg/hr. There were no significant differences in perioperative events between patients who achieved burst suppression and those who did not. After surgery, 33.3% of patients who achieved burst suppression were extubated and awakened. One patient in the non-burst suppression group experienced mild neurological deficits. No deaths occurred within one month postoperative. Conclusions: The optimal dosage of thiopental required to achieve burst suppression on intraoperative EEG during non-shunt carotid endarterectomy was 26.3±10.1 mg/kg/hr.

Algorithmic prediction of anaesthesia manpower quantity needs: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: A shortage of anaesthetists affects health system globally. This is a study on task-force to develop a predictive model for the appropriate number of anaesthetic providers (Y). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with randomisation from every health service region across Thailand. The decision-making criteria for manpower needed were written and provided guidance. The number of personnel was calculated from the sum of total time spent by all anaesthetic providers divided by duration of the service. Linear regression analysis was applied. RESULTS: In total 3774 patients were included from 18 hospitals. The factors that affect the anaesthetic providers' allocation needs were included in the predictive model, calculated as Y = 3.53 + [0.56 (standard centre) + 0.36 (advanced centre) + 1.03 (specialty centre)] + 0.07 (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV and V) + 0.61 (advanced anaesthetic medication) + [0.61 (monitored anaesthesia care) + 0.17 (general anaesthesia)] - [0.27 (pre-anaesthetic duration within 31-60 minutes) + (0.61 (over 60 minutes)] - [0.85 (anaesthetic duration within 31-60 minutes) + 1.04 (within 61-120 minutes) + 1.32 (over 120 minutes)] - [0.16 (post-anaesthetic duration within 31-60 minutes) + 0.45 (within 61-90 minutes) + 0.74 (over 90 minutes)]. CONCLUSION: The anaesthesia manpower algorithm developed during this study can be used to calculate the number of anaesthetists per population to maintain health services.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Perioperative Cardiovascular Complications in Spine Surgery.

Background: An increasing number of patients are opting for spine surgery despite the associated risk of cardiovascular complications. The evidence regarding the incidence and risk factors of cardiovascular complications in spine surgery is insufficient. Therefore, we aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for cardiovascular complications that occur perioperatively in spine surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent spine surgery between January 2018 and December 2019 at a single center. Demographic, clinical, and operative data were collected from electronic medical records. The incidence of perioperative cardiac complications was determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of perioperative cardiovascular complications in the participants. Results: Of the 1,002 eligible patients enrolled in the study, six developed cardiac complications. Acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and congestive heart failure occurred in one, two, and three patients, respectively. Risk factors for cardiovascular complications included scoliosis surgery (odds ratios (OR): 18.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.346-257.35) and a history of congestive heart failure (OR: 120.97; 95% CI: 2.12-6898.80). Conclusion: The incidence of perioperative cardiovascular complications in patients who underwent spine surgery was 0.6%. High-risk patients should be closely monitored optimally managed throughout the perioperative period.

Anesthesia workforce capacity in Thailand: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Workforce management in anesthesia services is crucial for service quality. However, the data associated with this are lacking. Therefore, this study was done to analyze workforce and workload and to compare differences among hospital clusters in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in multilevel hospitals that were classified by location, the population cared for, and the categorization of physicians. Stratified randomization from all health service regions across Thailand was done. The profile of hospitals, number of anesthesia staffs, their capabilities, and ratio of anesthesia personnel to the service provided during the 5 workdays and 1 weekend period were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 hospitals, ranging from secondary to super-tertiary referral centers, were included in the study. The mean number of personnel ranged from 2.0 ± 1.2 to 12.0 ± 0 for anesthesiologists and 7.5 ± 2.9 to 42.3 ± 19.3 for nurse anesthetists from each hospital cluster, which vary in terms of capabilities and the number of staff. The average number of anesthesia service units was 9.1 ± 4.2 to 31.9 ± 16.4, while the number of operating theaters was 6.9 ± 2.2 to 22.7 ± 8.3. However, the ratio of anesthesia personnel to one anesthesia service unit and the ratio of these personnel to an operating theater were not significantly different among the participating hospitals, with a mean of 0.94 ± 0.45 and 1.34 ± 0.38, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall number of anesthesia service units was above the designated operating theater capacity, while the ratio of anesthesiologists was 0.8-1.3 and nurse anesthetists was 2.4-6.5 per 100,000 people on an average, with a disproportionate responsibility ratio of anesthesia personnel to anesthesia service units during that time.

Unintended intraoperative awareness: An analysis of Perioperative Anesthetic Adverse Events in Thailand (PAAd Thai).

BACKGROUND: Despite the improvement of anesthetic-related modalities, the incidence of unintended intraoperative awareness remains at around 0.005-0.038%. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the intraoperative awareness incidents that occurred across Thailand between January to December, 2015. METHODS: Observational data was collected from 22 hospitals throughout Thailand. The awareness category was selected from incident reports according to the Perioperative Anesthetic Adverse Events in Thailand (PAAd Thai) study database and descriptive statistics were analyzed. The awareness characteristics and the related factors were recorded. RESULTS: A total of nine intraoperative awareness episodes from 2000 incidents were observed. The intraoperative awareness results were as follows: experience of pain (38.1%), perception of sound (33.3%), perception of intubation (9.5%) and feeling of paralysis (14.3%). The observed factors that affect intraoperative awareness were anesthesia-related (100%), patient-related (55.5%), surgery-related (22.2%) and systematic process-related (22.2%). The contributing factors were situational inexperience (77.8%) and inappropriate patient evaluation (44.4%). An awareness of anesthetic performer (100%) and experience (88.9%) were defined as incident-mitigating factors. The suggested corrective strategies were quality assurance activity (88.9%), improved supervision (44.4%) and equipment utilization (33.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Nine intraoperative awareness incidents were observed, however the causes were preventable. The anesthetic component seems to be the most influential to prevent these events.

Analgesic efficacy of intravenous nefopam after spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: The incidence of moderate to severe pain is high among patients undergoing spinal surgery. Nefopam can be used as an adjuvant analgesic postoperatively after spine surgery. The study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy and side effects of nefopam on 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption after spine surgery. Methods: The study is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 96 patients were randomized into 4 treatment groups, 24 each. In group 1, patients received normal saline before surgical incision and before the end of surgery. In group 2, patients received 30 mg nefopam before surgical incision and normal saline before the end of surgery. In group 3, patients received normal saline before surgical incision and 30 mg of nefopam before the end of surgery. In group 4, patients received 30 mg of nefopam in both timings. Patient-controlled analgesia morphine was used for the postoperative period. Outcomes were to determine 24-hour morphine consumption and incidence of side effects.  Results: Of 96 patients enrolled, 21 in placebo-placebo, 22 in nefopam-placebo, 22 in placebo-nefopam and 21 in nefopam-nefopam groups completed the study.  Analysis of the Kruskal-Wallis test on the intention-to-treat basis shows no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption between four groups, which were 18 [IQR 13.5-29], 20 [IQR 11-28.3], 17 [IQR 11.5-28.5], 13 [IQR 8.5-18.5] mg., respectively (p = 0.223). Incidence of side effects, including tachycardia, sedation, sweating and nausea/ vomiting, did not differ. Conclusions: Adding perioperative nefopam to opioid analgesic does not improve analgesic efficacy in patients who underwent spine surgery. Registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry ID TCTR20171115001; registered on 15 November 2017.

ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION (APACHE) II SCORE - THE CLINICAL PREDICTOR IN NEUROSURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.

The APACHE II scoring system is approved for its benchmarking and mortality predictions, but there are only a few articles published to demonstrate it in neurosurgical patients. Therefore, this study was performed to acknowledge this score and its predictive performance to hospital mortality in a tertiary referral neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). All patients admitted to the Neurosurgical ICU from February 1 to July 31, 2011 were recruited. The parameters indicated in APACHE II score were collected. The adjusted predicted risk of death was calculated and compared with the death rate observed. Descriptive statistics including the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed. The results showed that 276 patients were admitted during the mentioned period. The APACHE II score was 16.56 (95% CI, 15.84-17.29) and 19.08 (95% CI, 15.40-22.76) in survivors and non-survivors, while the adjusted predicted death rates were 13.39% (95% CI, 11.83-14.95) and 17.49% (95% CI, 9.81-25.17), respectively. The observed mortality was only 4.35%. The area under the ROC of APACHE II score to the hospital mortality was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.79). In conclusion, not only the APACHE II score in neurosurgical patients indicated low severity, but its performance to predict hospital mortality was also inferior. Additional studies of predicting mortality among these critical patients should be undertaken.

Perioperative anaesthetic adverse events in Thailand (PAAd THAI) study: Incident report of perioperative convulsion.

The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of perioperative convulsion and to suggest possible correcting strategies. The multi-centre study was conducted prospectively in 22 hospitals across Thailand in 2015. The occurrences of perioperative adverse events were collected. The data was collated by site manager and forwarded to the data management unit. All perioperative convulsion incidences were enrolled and analysed. The consensus was documented for the relevant factors and the corrective strategies. Descriptive statistics were used. From 2,000 incident reports, perioperative convulsions were found in 16 patients. Six episodes (37.5%) were related to anaesthesia, 31.3% to patients, 18.8% to surgery, and 12.5% to systemic processes. The contributing factor was an inexperienced anaesthesia performer (25%), while the corrective strategy was improvements to supervision (43.8%). Incidents of perioperative convulsion were found to be higher than during the last decade. The initiation and maintenance of safe anaesthesia should be continued.

Parameters Affecting Length of Stay Among Neurosurgical Patients in an Intensive Care Unit.

AIM: to determine the predictive factors on the length of stay of neurosurgical patients in the ICU setting. METHODS: all patients admitted to the neurosurgical ICU between February 1 and July 31, 2011 were recruited. Patient demographics and clinical data for each variable were collected within 30 minutes of admission. The ICU length of stay was recorded and analyzed by linear regression model with statistical significance at p-value <0.05. RESULTS: there were 276 patients admitted, of whom 89.1% were elective cases. The mean (95% CI) and median (min-max) of ICU length of stay were 2.36 (2.09-2.63) and 2 (1-25) days. The variables associated with ICU length of stay and their percent change (95% CI) were the Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscore (GCSm), 6.72% (-11.20 to -2.01) lower for every 1 point score change; blood pH, 1.16% (0.11 to 2.21) higher for every 0.01 unit change; and emergency admission type, 58.30% (29.16 to 94.0) higher as compared to elective admission. CONCLUSION: the GCSm, pH and emergency admission were found to be the main predictive variables of neurosurgical patient length of stay in the intensive care unit, however, the model should be further explored in a larger sample size and using subgroup analysis.

Alternative placement of bispectral index electrode for monitoring depth of anesthesia during neurosurgery.

In neurosurgery in particular, the recommended placement of electrodes for monitoring depth of anesthesia during surgery sometimes conflicts with the surgical site or patient positioning. Therefore, we proposed this study to evaluate the agreement and correlation of bispectral index values recorded from the usual frontal area and the alternate, post-auricular areas in neurosurgery patients. Thirty-four patients scheduled for neurosurgery under general anesthesia were included. Bispectral index (BIS) sensors were placed at both the frontal and post-auricular areas. The anesthesia given was clinically adjusted according to the frontal (standard) BIS reading. The BIS values and impedance were recorded;Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plots were analyzed. The bias±2SD for the electrode placement before, during, and post-anesthesia were 0±23.32, 1.5±10.69, and 2.1±13.52, while the limits of agreement were -23.3 to 23.3, -12.2 to 9.2, and -17.7 to 13.5, respectively. The correlation coefficient between frontal- and post-auricular-area electrodes was 0.74 with a p-value<0.001.The post-auricular placement of a BIS electrode is a practical alternative to frontal lobe placement. Nevertheless, proper electrode location is important to minimize error.

Prediction of discharge outcome with the full outline of unresponsiveness (FOUR) score in neurosurgical patients.

To identify the diagnostic properties of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and the discharge outcome, 318 patients were studied. The evaluators rated the patients on admission or when they had mental status alteration with the FOUR score. The course of treatment was determined based on the clinical. The mortality rate and Glasgow Outcome Scale were recorded. Adjusted regression models and prognostic performance were tested by calculation of the receiver operating characteristic curve. One-hundred and twenty-two patients (40.1%) had a poor outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score from 3-5, and 38 patients (12.5%) died. The area under the characteristic curve (AUC) for poor outcome and in-hospital mortality were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97). The cut-off point of 14 showed sensitivity and specificity of the total FOUR score predicting poor outcomes at 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.84) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), while the cut-off point of 10 showed the values for in-hospital mortality at 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.83) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96). The total FOUR score showed satisfactory prognostic value for predicting outcome. The cut-off points for the poor outcome and in-hospital mortality are 14 and 10, respectively.

Endorsement of the FOUR score for consciousness assessment in neurosurgical patients.

The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score was previously developed for neurological assessment, but has not been validated in neurosurgical patients, so was compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in practice. Four groups of raters, expert clinicians, novice clinicians, experienced nurses, and inexperienced nurses, assessed 64 patients in awake, drowsy, stuporous, and comatose conditions to investigate rater reliability. Then, 36 patients were evaluated by 1 expert clinician and 1 from the other groups randomly to test the difference. Spearman's correlation was used to find the correlation between both scores from 68 patients. The estimation of FOUR score cut points was validated by weighted kappa compared with the GCS to establish the risk prognosis. Score feasibility was analyzed by nonparametric test. Intraclass correlation in each group was over 0.9, with no difference between expert and inexperienced raters (p > 0.05). The correlation was 0.78. Low, intermediate, and high risk prognosis were associated with 0-7, 8-14, and 15-16 FOUR scores with kappa of 0.92. The feasibility of the FOUR score was lower than that of the GCS (p < 0.01). The FOUR score is reliable and valid for consciousness evaluation with some consequences for practicability. Extensive implementation would increase familiarity.

Evaluation of acute postoperative pain monitoring program for nurses in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an acute postoperative pain monitoring program (APPMP) on pain knowledge, attitude, and applicability of nurses at Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: This study was conducted from 1st March to 31st October 2008, at the Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. Thirty-five neurological nurses were recruited. The effectiveness was evaluated using 3 indicators: pain knowledge score, attitude score, and nursing practice score. The mean score from each indicator group was calculated as the pre-APPMP launching test based. For the post-APPMP launching test, pain knowledge score, and attitude score were measured immediately after educating the participants, while the nursing practice score was measured 6 months later. The descriptive statistics and paired t-test were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at p<0.001. RESULTS: The nurses' pain knowledge score increased significantly from 36.3-64.8%, together with the practice score from 20-32.2% (p<0.001). The nurses' pain attitude scores were 82.4% in the pre-test, and 84.2% post-test. The patients' satisfaction for the 24 hour post-operation pain management was 4.2+/-0.73, on a 5-point Likert scale. CONCLUSION: The APPMP was effective in improving nurses' pain knowledge and practice. Although changing nurses' behavior in controlling patients' pain is possibly time consuming, however, education and a consultation system are still necessary.

Blood glucose level in neurosurgery. Is it different between isoflurane and desflurane anesthesia?

AIM: A tight control of blood glucose is critical. We compare blood glucose level between isoflurane and desflurane in neurosurgical patients for further application. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients scheduled for neurosurgery under general anesthesia were recruited and divided into two groups; fentanyl-isoflurane-nitrous oxide based and fentanyl-desflurane-nitrous oxide based randomly. Vital signs, end tidal gas concentration, amount of narcotics usage and blood glucose level were recorded at induction (T0) and intraoperative hourly thereafter (T1-T8). Independent t-test and ANOVA were used. The statistical significance was considered if p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 107 patients enrolled excluded one from isoflurane group because of the schedule changes. The amounts of fentanyl usage (0.89+/-0.41 mcg/kg/hr, 0.88+/-0.48 mcg/kg/hr), the end tidal inhales' tension (0.71%+/-0.32, 3.13%+/-1.63) were equivalent in isoflurane and desflurane group. The blood glucose levels at various period of time had no statistical difference but there was a significant (p<0.05) increasing from T1 to T8 comparing to T0 in both groups (3.88+/-0.93 mg%/hr and 5.55+/-1.14 mg%/hr). CONCLUSION: Desflurane has demonstrated the indistinguishable blood glucose level and hemodynamic response from isoflurane anesthesia intraoperatively in neurosurgical patients, confirming a comparable pattern of blood glucose concentration intensifying over time spends.

The Thai Anesthesia Incident Monitoring study (Thai AIMS): an analysis of 21 awareness events.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the characteristics, outcomes, and the circumstances associated with intraoperative recall of awareness. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Relevant data of intra-operative recall of awareness were extracted from the Thai Anesthesia Incident Monitoring study (Thai AIMS) database of 1996 incident reports and 2537 incidents which were conducted among 51 hospitals throughout Thailand from January to June, 2007. Details regarding patients, surgical, anesthetic and systematic factors were recorded in a structured data record form. The completed record forms were reviewed independently by three anesthesiologists. The descriptive statistic was analyzed by using SPSS software version 11.5 and demonstrated in number and percent. RESULTS: Twenty-one incidents (21/1996 = 1.05%) of intra-operative recall of awareness were reported. Awareness was predominantly found in females (76.2%) and with ASA physical status I (47.6%). Most of the patients recalled events during the maintenance period and reported sound (71.4%), pain (52.4%), feeling operated (38.1%), paralysis (33.3%), recognizing intubated (4.8%) and panic (4.8%). Anxiety (33.3%), temporary emotional stress (19%), and post traumatic stress (4.8%) were found during immediate outcome assessment but scarcely sustained on the hospital discharged date. The factors associated with the incidents were anesthetic related in the majority especially ineffective monitoring (100%), pre-medication abandonment (100%) and light anesthesia (71.5%). CONCLUSION: Intra-operative recall of awareness in the Thai AIMS was 1.05% of all incident reports. Most of the events were considered as anesthesia related. The suggested corrective strategies were quality assurance activity, effective monitoring and equipment maintenance.

Multicentered study of model of anesthesia related adverse events in Thailand by incident report (The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Monitoring Study): results.

OBJECTIVE: The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Monitoring Study (Thai AIMS) was aimed to identify and analyze anesthesia incidents in order to find out the frequency distribution, clinical courses, management of incidents, and investigation of model appropriate for possible corrective strategies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifty-one hospitals (comprising of university, military, regional, general, and district hospitals across Thailand) participated in the present study. Each hospital was invited to report, on an anonymous and voluntary basis, any unintended anesthesia incident during six months (January to June 2007). A standardized incident report form was developed in order to fill in what, where, when, how, and why it happened in both the close-end and open-end questionnaire. Each incident report was reviewed by three reviewers. Any disagreement was discussed and judged to achieve a consensus. RESULTS: Among 1996 incident reports and 2537 incidents, there were more male (55%) than female (45%) patients with ASA PS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = 22%, 36%, 24%, 11%, and 7%, respectively. Surgical specialties that posed high risk of incidents were neurosurgical, otorhino-laryngological, urological, and cardiac surgery. Common places where incidents occurred were operating room (61%), ward (10%), and recovery room (9%). Common occurred incidents were arrhythmia needing treatment (25%), desaturation (24%), death within 24 hr (20%), cardiac arrest (14%), reintubation (10%), difficult intubation (8%), esophageal intubation (5%), equipment failure (5%), and drug error (4%) etc. Monitors that first detected incidents were EKG (46%), Pulse oximeter (34%), noninvasive blood pressure (12%), capnometry (4%), and mean arterial pressure (1%). CONCLUSION: Common factors related to incidents were inexperience, lack of vigilance, inadequate preanesthetic evaluation, inappropriate decision, emergency condition, haste, inadequate supervision, and ineffective communication. Suggested corrective strategies were quality assurance activity, clinical practice guideline, improvement of supervision, additional training, improvement of communication, and an increase in personnel.

The Thai Anesthesia Incident Monitoring Study (Thai AIMS) of endobronchial intubation: an analysis of 1996 incident reports.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical course, outcomes, contributing factor, corrective and preventive strategies of accidental endobroncheal intubation (EBI) in the Thai Anesthesia Incident Monitoring Study (Thai AIMS). MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a prospective descriptive multicenter study of anesthesia-related adverse incidents from 51 hospitals across Thailand from January to June 2007. Possible accidental EBI data were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics by 3 reviewers. RESULTS: Thirty-two cases (1.6%) of EBI were reported from a total of l996 Thai AIMS incidents. EBI occurred more often in females (71.9%). Most of the incidents happened in the operating theater (93.8%) and the most common surgical specialties were general and gynecological surgery (20.6% each). Two cases had hypoxemia and 1 case required respiratory supported postoperatively. Most incidents (65.6%) were first recognized via monitoring equipment which was detected by pulse oximeter (71.4%) and airway pressure measurement (4.8%). Ninety six percent of cases were considered preventable. Anesthetic factors and system factors were found to involve in 62.5% and 11.8% of incidents respectively. The major contributing factors were inexperience of the performers (84.4%), lack of knowledge (40.6%), haste (21.9%) and communication failure (9.4%). The incident would be minimized by having prior experience of incident, high awareness and experienced assistants available. Three main strategies to prevent the incident included additional training, improvement supervision and established guideline practice. CONCLUSION: Accidental endobronchial intubation was reported as 1.6% of anesthetic adverse event in Thai AIMS. Majority of the incidents were contributed by anesthesia and system factors. High awareness, experience of performers and additional training would decrease the incidents and improve anesthetic outcome.

The Thai Anesthesia Incidents (THAI Study) of anesthetic risk factors related to perioperative death and perioperative cardiovascular complications in intracranial surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlations between anesthetic risk factors and perioperative cardiovascular complications as well as perioperative death within 72 hours. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This case controlled took the data from the Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study), a prospective multi-centered registry of anesthesia in Thailand. The authors included all the patients who received intracranial surgery from 20 hospitals throughout Thailand. The present study was divided into two groups and focused on anesthetic factors that possibly related to perioperative cardiovascular complications or perioperative death. The statistical analysis were Chi Square test and logistic regression model with the statistical significance if p-value < 0.05 demonstrated in Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: From the 7,430 patients, there were 63 patients (0.85%) with perioperative cardiovascular complication. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3-5 (OR 5.77, 95% CI 2.33-14.27) and the absence of anesthesiologists (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.06-4.54) had statistical correlation with the cardiovascular complication. Eighty-four patients (1.13%) who died within 72 hours post operatively were found. The ASA physical status 3-5 (OR 10.14, 95% CI 3.42-30.02), the emergency circumstance (OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.31-9.60), and the absence of endtidal carbondioxide monitor (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.26-4.09) had statistical correlation with the perioperative death. CONCLUSION: Predictors of perioperative cardiovascular complications in intracranial surgical patients were ASA physical status 3-5 and absence of certified board anesthesiologists. Risk factors of perioperative death were ASA physical status 3-5, emergency condition, and absence or no monitoring of capnometer.