A deep learning analysis of stroke onset time prediction and comparison to DWI-FLAIR mismatch.

INTRODUCTION: When time since stroke onset is unknown, DWI-FLAIR mismatch rating is an established technique for patient stratification. A visible DWI lesion without corresponding parenchymal hyperintensity on FLAIR suggests time since onset of under 4.5 h and thus a potential benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. To improve accuracy and availability of the mismatch concept, deep learning might be able to augment human rating and support decision-making in these cases. METHODS: We used unprocessed DWI and coregistered FLAIR imaging data to train a deep learning model to predict dichotomized time since ischemic stroke onset. We analyzed the performance of Group Convolutional Neural Networks compared to other deep learning methods. Unlabeled imaging data was used for pre-training. Prediction performance of the best deep learning model was compared to the performance of four independent junior and senior raters. Additionally, in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters, model ratings were used to augment human performance. Post-hoc gradient-based explanations were analyzed to gain insights into model predictions. RESULTS: Our best predictive model performed comparably to human raters. Using model ratings in cases deemed indeterminable by human raters improved rating accuracy and interrater agreement for junior and senior ratings. Post-hoc explainability analyses showed that the model localized stroke lesions to derive predictions. DISCUSSION: Our analysis shows that deep learning based clinical decision support has the potential to improve the accessibility of the DWI-FLAIR mismatch concept by supporting patient stratification.

Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Established randomized trial-based parameters for acute ischemic stroke group patients into generic treatment groups, leading to attempts using various artificial intelligence (AI) methods to directly correlate patient characteristics to outcomes and thereby provide decision support to stroke clinicians. We review AI-based clinical decision support systems in the development stage, specifically regarding methodological robustness and constraints for clinical implementation. METHODS: Our systematic review included full-text English language publications proposing a clinical decision support system using AI techniques for direct decision support in acute ischemic stroke cases in adult patients. We (1) describe data and outcomes used in those systems, (2) estimate the systems' benefits compared with traditional stroke diagnosis and treatment, and (3) reported concordance with reporting standards for AI in healthcare. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one studies met our inclusion criteria. Sixty-five were included for full extraction. In our sample, utilized data sources, methods, and reporting practices were highly heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest significant validity threats, dissonance in reporting practices, and challenges to clinical translation. We outline practical recommendations for the successful implementation of AI research in acute ischemic stroke treatment and diagnosis.