The prognostic significance of PD-1 and its ligands in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2) expressions on immune and cancer cells in terms of survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2012, a total of 191 patients (172 males, 19 females; mean age: 60.3±8.4 years; range, 38 to 78 years) who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and underwent anatomic resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were evaluated in three groups including lung squamous cell carcinoma (n=61), adenocarcinoma (n=66), and large-cell carcinoma (n=64). The survival rates of all three groups were compared in terms of immunohistochemical expression levels of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2. Results: The mean follow-up was 71.8±47.9 months. In all histological subtypes, PD-1 expressions on tumor and immune cells were observed in 33% (61/191) and in 53.1% (102/191) of the patients, respectively. Higher expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2 at any intensity on tumor and immune cells were defined only in lung adenocarcinomas, and PD-L1 and PD-L2 values were detected in 36.4% (22/64) of these patients. The PD-L1 expressions on tumor and immune cells were observed in 41.7% (10/24) and 25% (6/24) of the patients, respectively. The PD-L2 expressions on tumor and immune cells were detected in 16.7% (4/24) and 8.4% (2/24) of the patients, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that PD-1 expression in tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor in all histological subtypes. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that PD-1 expression is a poor prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma.

Identification of ALK Mutation in Neuroblastoma on the Point of Molecular Heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In neuroblastoma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations have recently received attention as molecular targets for the treatment of neuroblastoma, as 6% to 10% of patients with neuroblastoma have anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations. There are little data from the cases in Turkey. We aimed to detect anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations and molecular heterogeneity in neuroblastoma using next-generation sequencing. This study is the first one with this many cases in Turkey. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing analysis was performed using an Illumina MiniSeq custom gene panel. Clinically important mutations were selected for the analysis. We also gathered clinical data of the patients from Turkish Pediatric Oncology Group cohorts to associate them with anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations. This study is a retrospective cross-sectional study. We followed STROBE guideline (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/) on this study. RESULTS: We analyzed anaplastic lymphoma kinase in 108 patients with neuroblastoma, with a mean age of 43.76 months. Pathogenic anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations were detected in 13 patients (12.04%). We noted that anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations were primarily observed in intermediate- and high-risk patients (P = .028). R1275Q and F1174-related mutations were predominant; I1171T, L1226F, S1189F, V1135A, and G1125S mutations were rare. Duplicate samples did not exhibit any heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: We found that F1174 and R1275Q-related anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations are the most common pathogenic mutations in neuroblastoma. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation status did not show any heterogeneity, and the mutations were correlated with intermediate- or high-risk groups.

Comparison of Cytotoxic and Ototoxic Effects of Lipoplatin and Cisplatin in Neuroblastoma In Vivo Tumor Model.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the cytotoxic, cytostatic, and ototoxic effects of lipoplatin compared to cisplatin application in the subcutaneous xenograft nude mouse neuroblastoma tumor model. METHODS: In this study, C1300 neuroblastoma cells were administered subcutaneously to 21 male nude mice. When the tumor reached 150 mm3 diameter, mice were randomized into 3 groups. Saline, cisplatin, and lipoplatin were given intraperitoneally. The auditory function tests were performed before administration and 72 hours after administration. Mice were sacrificed and the tumor and cochlea were removed after 72 hours. Histopathologic evaluation of necrosis and apoptosis was determined by the TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method. Cyclooxygenase 2, superoxide dismutase 2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in tissue samples. RESULTS: Apoptosis and necrosis rates were higher in lipoplatin group than in cisplatin group (P=.035 and P=.010, respectively) in tumor tissue. In the spiral ganglion, apoptosis and necrosis were lower in the lipoplatin group than in cisplatin group (P=.002 and P=.002, respectively). Cyclooxygenase 2 pattern in the cochlea was positive in both control and lipoplatin group and negative in cisplatin group (P=.001). Superoxide dismutase 2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase 2 protein expressions showed no difference between groups. The auditory functions were similar to baseline values and had a better threshold value in lipoplatin group than cisplatin group. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of neuroblastoma, the use of lipoplatin seems to be beneficial in reducing side effects of cisplatin. We recommend that the mechanism of these properties of lipoplatin should be evaluated in further studies.

Scanning all chromosomal abnormalities with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization in differential diagnosis of pediatric cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Despite conventional histopathological and immunohistochemical methods, difficulties may be experienced in the differential diagnosis of pediatric cancers, especially in small round-cell undifferentiated tumors. In these cases, the determination of chromosomal abnormalities may be helpful. The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of the whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization method in pediatric cancers where difficulty is experienced in differential diagnosis. METHOD: In Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), 135,000 probes were scanned as 3 probes per gene in all genomes. It was possible to analyze paraffin block tissues obtained from the archive of the Pathology Laboratory of Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital. DNA extraction was made from the paraffin blocks of 24 cases where difficulty had been experienced in making the differential diagnosis and in each case, comparisons with the control samples were made for all anomalies in all chromosomes using microarray technology. RESULTS: Together with the typically observed chromosomal anomalies, additional derangements with debatable importance were determined. CONCLUSION: The whole genome CGH method may be useful in pediatric cancers where difficulties are experienced in making differential diagnoses. Since technical difficulties are experienced in the examination of paraffin-embedded tissue samples, storing fresh tissue samples from each tumor will be helpful for genetic and molecular examinations.