Giant retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma: Is preoperative biopsy always mandatory?

INTRODUCTION: Schwannoma is the term given to tumours arising from Schwann cells of any nerve sheath. It may arise in the retroperitoneum, where it can attain enormous sizes and cause considerable diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. A variety of incapacitating symptoms may arise, depending on its size alone and the related contagious organs. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 71-year-old female, who was incapacitated by a giant abdominal mass, associated with weight loss, immobility, general weakness and constipation. Radiologically, the presence of a huge pelviabdominal tumour was confirmed. A preoperative tissue diagnosis was entertained but omitted, and we resorted to direct surgical excision instead. During surgery, significant bleeding from the surrounding lumbar vessels was encountered, but it was controlled and the tumour was excised intact. Histopathologically, it showed the histologic features of ancient schwannoma. DISCUSSION: In the patient presented here, who was rendered immobile by the tumour, total excision or at least debulking seemed appropriate, regardless of any biopsy result. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of retroperitoneal schwannoma and its variant "ancient schwannoma" should be considered when a huge pelviabdominal tumour is encountered. Although CT guided biopsy may be helpful in reaching a preoperative diagnosis, this might not change the decision for the need of total tumour excision or at least debulking, in the presence of incapacitating symptoms. With large tumours, the possibility of perioperative exanginating haemorrhage should be remembered and the necessary precautions activated.

Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.

Many surgeons practice prophylactic drainage after cholecystectomy without reliable evidence. This study was conducted to answer the question whether to drain or not to drain after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. A retrospective review of all patients who had cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, was conducted from April 2010 to April 2012. Data were extracted from hospital case files. Preoperative data included clinical presentation, routine investigations and liver function tests. Operative data included excessive adhesions, bleeding, bile leak, and drain insertion. Complicated cases such as pericholecystic collections, mucocele and empyema were also reported. Patients who needed therapeutic drainage were excluded. Postoperative data included hospital stay, volume of drained fluid, time of drain removal, and drain site problems. The study included 103 patients allocated into two groups; group A (n  =  38) for patients with operative drain insertion and group B (n  =  65) for patients without drain insertion. The number of patients with preoperative diagnosis of acute non-complicated cholecystitis was significantly greater in group B (80%) than group A (36.8%) (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in group A. All patients who were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were in group A. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital stay was significantly (P < 0.001) longer in patients with preoperative complications. There was no added benefit for prophylactic drain insertion after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in non-complicated or in complicated cases.