RESUMEN
Background: Game-Based Learning (GBL) is an innovative pedagogical approach that utilizes digital applications to enhance health sciences higher education. Therefore, analyzing faculty and students' perspectives on GBL can help educational administrators, educators, and researchers tailor GBL to students' needs. Purpose: This study aimed to explore faculty (teachers) and students' perspectives towards GBL in health sciences higher education. Further to identify barriers affecting the use of GBL as well as recommendations for its use from their perspectives. Methods: A descriptive-qualitative approach was conducted at a Saudi university. A total of 42 semi-structured interviews were completed with a purposive sampling of 22 faculty members and 20 students until data saturation. The data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. Results: Faculty members and students reflected on their personal experiences using GBL, and the data presented seven themes and 30 categories emerged from the content analysis: common digital apps, purpose and uses, effect or benefits of GBL, personal experience with GBL, challenges and barriers affecting the use of digital games, and recommendations for educators on using GBL apps. Conclusion: The experiences of both students and faculty demonstrated that GBL can enhance classroom learning and complement traditional teaching approaches in health sciences higher education. GBL's safe, immersive environment lets students practice many generic skills, boosting interest, motivation, and peer-mediated learning. Faculty and students shared their GBL experiences, responsibilities, and enthusiasm. Health sciences higher education institutions should consider ways to increase flexibility in providing resources and training to educators who want to build and use the GBL approach in their classroom.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The optimal time for umbilical cord clamping after delivery has been under debate for several decades. This study aimed to assess the time-dependent effects of umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: An observational correlational design was used to recruit 161 pregnant women conveniently. Outcomes were observed and recorded using a structured checklist developed by the authors. Pregnant females aged ≥18 years, with uncomplicated delivery, and who were willing to participate were recruited. Exclusion criteria included stillbirths, newborns with congenital anomalies, newborns too small for their gestational age, intra-uterine growth restriction, nuchal cord, and meconium-stained liquor. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 29.93 ± 6 years. Early clamping (<1 minute) was performed for 93.8% of the participants with a mean of 29.58 ± 18 seconds. Delayed clamping was associated with a decrease in blood loss and the length of hospital stay in addition to an increase in first-minute APGAR score and neonatal temperature (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cord clamping was associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.