Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 26(6): 1664-9, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22179474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fully covered esophageal self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) often are used for palliation of malignant dysphagia. However, experience and data on these stents are still limited. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fully covered nitinol SEMS in patients with malignant dysphagia. METHODS: 37 patients underwent placement of a SEMS during a 3 year period. Five patients underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery: one for tracheoesophageal fistula in the setting of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, one for perforation in setting of esophageal adenocarcinoma, 27 for unresectable esophageal cancer (16 adenocarcinoma, 11 squamous cell carcinoma), two for lung cancer, and one for breast-cancer-related esophageal strictures. RESULTS: SEMS placement was successful in all 37 patients. Immediate complications after stent deployment included chest pain (n = 6), severe heartburn (n = 1), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring SEMS revision (n = 1). Dysphagia scores improved significantly from 3.2 ± 0.4 before stent placement to 1.4 ± 1.0 at 1 month (P < 0.0001), 1.1 ± 1.2 (P < 0.0001) at 3 months, and 1.3 ± 1.4 (P = 0.0018) at 6 months. The stent was removed in 11 patients (30%) for the following indications: resolution of stricture (n = 3), stent malfunction (n = 5), and stent migration (n = 3). After stent removal, three patients were restented, three underwent dilation, and two underwent PEG placement. Mean survival for the 37 patients after stent placement was 146.3 ± 143.6 (range, 13-680) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that fully covered SEMS placement improve dysphagia scores in patients with malignant strictures, particularly in the unresectable population. Further technical improvements in design to minimize long-term malfunction and migration are required.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Estenosis Esofágica/cirugía , Stents , Anciano , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Remoción de Dispositivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 73(4): 673-81, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21272871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fully covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) are thought to induce less mucosal hyperplasia and are potentially removable. They may constitute an attractive alternative for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCSEMSs in the treatment of benign esophageal diseases. DESIGN: Patients referred for management of benign esophageal disease underwent placement of an FCSEMS and were entered into a prospective database and analyzed retrospectively for clinical response, efficacy, and morbidity. SETTING: Two tertiary care centers with long-standing experience in the management of benign esophageal strictures. PATIENTS: Between January 2006 and September 2007, 35 patients (mean age 61 years, range 20-85 years) underwent FCSEMS placement for benign esophageal diseases at 2 tertiary academic medical centers. There were 19 patients with benign esophageal strictures and 16 patients with leaks/perforations. INTERVENTION: Temporary placement of FCSEMS until stricture resolution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical response, efficacy, and morbidity. RESULTS: Indications for stent placement were esophageal leak/fistulae (n = 12), refractory benign strictures (n = 10), anastomotic strictures (n = 7), perforations (n = 4), and radiation-induced strictures (n = 2). Immediate complications were chest pain (2 patients), stent migration (2 patients), dysphagia (1 patient), respiratory compromise (1 patient), and arrhythmia (1 patient). Long-term complications included recurrent dysphagia (6 patients), aspiration pneumonia (2 patients), globus sensation (2 patients), abdominal pain (2 patients), and fever (1 patient). Stent migration was observed in 12 patients (34%). After placement, dysphagia scores at 1 month improved significantly from 3.1 ± 1.0 to 1.2 ± 1.3 (P < .0001). A total of 11 of 35 patients (31%) were treated successfully. Specifically, 21% of patients with refractory strictures and 44% of patients with leaks/fistulae had successful long-term outcomes without any need for reinterventions. All stents were retrieved successfully, except for 1 stent, which fractured and was retrieved in 2 pieces without any complications. CONCLUSION: Use of FCSEMSs for benign esophageal conditions was associated with frequent stent migration and long-term improvement in only one third of patients. Further investigation is required before recommending FCSEMS placement to treat benign diseases of the esophagus and to further characterize the subgroup that might benefit from these interventions.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Enfermedades del Esófago/cirugía , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aleaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Remoción de Dispositivos , Enfermedades del Esófago/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Esófago/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA