Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 72(2): 461-473, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953682

RESUMEN

The hemoglobin-haptoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 is present in both a membrane-bound form on monocytes and macrophages (mCD163) and a shed soluble circulating form (sCD163). CD163 is a well-described marker of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages, but in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), monocyte mCD163 and serum sCD163 levels have not previously been investigated and associated with patient overall survival (OS). Here, we report mCD163 expression on peripheral blood monocytes, as well as sCD163 serum levels, in samples from 89 patients newly diagnosed with mRCC and 20 healthy controls. We found that in mRCC patients, compared to healthy controls, monocyte mCD163 levels were reduced (P < 0.001) whereas serum sCD163 levels were increased (P = 0.004). Moreover, an inverse correlation between mCD163 and sCD163 levels (P = 0.04) was shown. In survival analyses, intermediary levels of monocyte mCD163 were associated with longest OS, compared to both lower and higher mCD163 levels, which were both associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.01). Further, higher levels of sCD163 at diagnosis were associated with poor OS in both univariate (P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.28; 95%CI 1.09-1.50, P = 0.002). Importantly, stratification by low vs. high sCD163 was able to separate patients with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate risk (IMDCINT) into two subgroups with different OS (P = 0.03): IMDCINT-sCD163LOW showed survival similar to IMDCFAV patients, and IMDCINT-sCD163HIGH showed survival similar to IMDCPOOR patients. Thus, baseline sCD163 is a novel independent biomarker of OS in mRCC, and using sCD163 as an add-on biomarker may improve prognostic value for patients in the heterogenous IMDC intermediate group.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Pronóstico , Antígenos de Diferenciación Mielomonocítica/metabolismo , Biomarcadores
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 1873209, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396863

RESUMEN

Fused real-time ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to improve the accuracy of advanced image guided procedures. However, its use in regional anesthesia is practically nonexistent. In this randomized controlled crossover trial, we aim to explore effectiveness, procedure-related outcomes, injectate spread analyzed by MRI, and safety of ultrasound/MRI fusion versus ultrasound guided Suprasacral Parallel Shift (SSPS) technique for lumbosacral plexus blockade. Twenty-six healthy subjects aged 21-36 years received two SSPS blocks (20 mL 2% lidocaine-epinephrine [1 : 200,000] added 1 mL diluted contrast) guided by ultrasound/MRI fusion versus ultrasound. Number (proportion) of subjects with motor blockade of the femoral and obturator nerves and the lumbosacral trunk was equal (ultrasound/MRI, 23/26 [88%]; ultrasound, 23/26 [88%]; p = 1.00). Median (interquartile range) preparation and procedure times (s) were longer for the ultrasound/MRI fusion guided technique (686 [552-1023] versus 196 [167-228], p < 0.001 and 333 [254-439] versus 216 [176-294], p = 0.001). Both techniques produced perineural spread and corresponding sensory analgesia from L2 to S1. Epidural spread and lidocaine pharmacokinetics were similar. Different compartmentalized patterns of injectate spread were observed. Ultrasound/MRI fusion guided SSPS was equally effective and safe but required prolonged time, compared to ultrasound guided SSPS. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2013-004013-41) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02593370).


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Plexo Lumbosacro/efectos de los fármacos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Espacio Epidural/efectos de los fármacos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Plexo Lumbosacro/fisiopatología , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos
3.
Cytometry A ; 89(11): 1001-1009, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27731950

RESUMEN

Nonspecific binding of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to Fc-receptors on leukocytes is an important cause of background fluorescence in flow cytometry, and failing to block such nonspecific binding can lead to erroneous results. A major part of previous studies on blocking reagents for flow cytometry have been done in mice, and published results are not completely in agreement. In humans, Fc-receptors are found on most leukocytes, with highest abundance on monocytes/macrophages. Therefore, in the present study our aim was to thoroughly investigate the efficiency of different commonly used blocking reagents regarding inhibition of nonspecific binding of mouse mAbs to human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). Monocytes and MDMs showed strong nonspecific binding of IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes, but not IgG2b. In contrast, B-cells, T-cells, and NK-cells did not substantially bind any of the mouse isotype control antibodies evaluated (IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b). Importantly, we show that binding of IgG1 and IgG2a to monocytes and MDMs can be eliminated by blocking, either with a commercial Fc-blocking reagent, with mouse or human serum, or with mouse or human IgG in high concentration. Previously, isotype controls have been widely used in flow cytometry assays. However, we show that such controls may be highly unreliable, and we believe they should not be used as gating controls, or to determine background signal. Based on these results, as well as considerations of price and applicability, our recommendation is not to use isotypes as gating controls in flow cytometry, but instead to use 100 µg/mL of purified human IgG as blocking reagent for elimination of nonspecific binding of mouse mAbs to human MNCs and MDMs. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Macrófagos/inmunología , Receptores Fc/inmunología , Animales , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Humanos , Ratones , Monocitos/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...