Chest CT features and functional correlates of COVID-19 at 3 months and 12 months follow-up.

Long-term pulmonary sequelae of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to establish post-COVID-19 temporal changes in chest computed tomography (CT) features of pulmonary fibrosis and to investigate associations with respiratory symptoms and physiological parameters at 3 and 12 months' follow-up. Adult patients who attended our initial COVID-19 follow-up service and developed chest CT features of interstitial lung disease, in addition to cases identified using British Society of Thoracic Imaging codes, were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical data were gathered on respiratory symptoms and physiological parameters at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Corresponding chest CT scans were reviewed by two thoracic radiologists. Associations between CT features and functional correlates were estimated using random effects logistic or linear regression adjusted for age, sex and body mass index. In total, 58 patients were assessed. No changes in reticular pattern, honeycombing, traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis index or pulmonary distortion were observed. Subpleural curvilinear lines were associated with lower odds of breathlessness over time. Parenchymal bands were not associated with breathlessness or impaired lung function overall. Based on our results, we conclude that post-COVID-19 chest CT features of irreversible pulmonary fibrosis remain static over time; other features either resolve or remain unchanged. Subpleural curvilinear lines do not correlate with breathlessness. Parenchymal bands are not functionally significant. An awareness of the different potential functional implications of post-COVID-19 chest CT changes is important in the assessment of patients who present with multi-systemic sequelae of COVID-19 infection.

Recovering from COVID-19: lessons learnt from an intensive secondary care follow-up service.

In response to the first COVID-19 surge in 2020, secondary care outpatient services were rapidly reconfigured to provide specialist review for disease sequelae. At our institution, comprising hospitals across three sites in London, we initially implemented a COVID-19 follow-up pathway that was in line with expert opinion at the time but more intensive than initial clinical guidelines suggested. We retrospectively evaluated the resource requirements for this service, which supported 526 patients from April 2020 to October 2020. At the 6-week review, 193/403 (47.9%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 46/336 (13.7%) desaturated on exercise testing, 167/403 (41.4%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services and 190/403 (47.1%) needed 12-week follow-up. At the 12-week review, 113/309 (36.6%) patients reported persistent breathlessness, 30/266 (11.3%) desaturated on exercise testing and 150/309 (48.5%) were discharged from COVID-19-related secondary care services. Referrals were generated to multiple medical specialties, particularly respiratory subspecialties. Our analysis allowed us to justify rationalising and streamlining provisions for subsequent COVID-19 waves while reassured that opportunities for early intervention were not being missed.