Determinants of influenza non-vaccination among Canadian children: insights from a nationwide survey.

Background: To identify determinants influencing Canadian parents' decision not to vaccinate their children aged 6 months to 17 years against seasonal influenza. Methods: Data from the 2022 Childhood COVID-19 Immunization Coverage Survey, a national survey of approximately 10,500 Canadian parents/guardians and their children, was analyzed. The survey examined influenza vaccine coverage, parental perspectives on vaccines, reasons for hesitancy, and factors influencing immunization. Socio-demographic characteristics, including ethnicity, household income, working sector, educational attainment, and prevalence of chronic medical conditions among children were considered. Historical vaccine uptake and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on immunization decisions were also reviewed. Key determinants of non-vaccination in the 2021-2022 influenza season were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, with a statistical significance level set at p-value <0·05. Results: 70% of children aged 6 months to 17 years did not receive the seasonal influenza vaccine. Key predictors for non-vaccination included: residing in rural settings (aOR 1·35, 95% CI 1·13-1·60), parental education attainment of less than high school (aOR 2·48, 95% CI 1·24-4·97), and the absence of chronic medical conditions in children (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.34-1.91)· Other strong predictors included lower household income; deterrence due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and parental hesitancy stemming from concerns about the vaccine's safety, effectiveness, and by beliefs that their child was not at risk of contracting the influenza or severe consequences from the infection. Conclusion: This research underscores pivotal determinants of parental decisions not to vaccinate their children against seasonal influenza and sheds light on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results highlight the importance of addressing safety concerns and providing clear information to alleviate hesitancy.

Myocarditis and Pericarditis Post-mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: Insights from a Pharmacovigilance Perspective.

Concerns remain regarding the rare cardiovascular adverse events, myocarditis and pericarditis (myo/pericarditis), particularly in younger individuals following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Our study aimed to comprehensively assess potential safety signals related to these cardiac events following the primary and booster doses, with a specific focus on younger populations, including children as young as 6 months of age. Using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the United States national passive surveillance system, we conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzing spontaneous reports of myo/pericarditis. We employed both frequentist and Bayesian methods and conducted subgroup analyses by age, sex, and vaccine dose. We observed a higher reporting rate of myo/pericarditis following the primary vaccine series, particularly in males and mainly after the second dose. However, booster doses demonstrated a lower number of reported cases, with no significant signals detected after the fourth or fifth doses. In children and young adults, we observed notable age and sex differences in the reporting of myo/pericarditis cases. Males in the 12-17 and 18-24-year-old age groups had the highest number of cases, with significant signals for both males and females after the second dose. We also identified an increased reporting for a spectrum of cardiovascular symptoms such as chest pain and dyspnea, which increased with age, and were reported more frequently than myo/pericarditis. The present study identified signals of myo/pericarditis and related cardiovascular symptoms after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, especially among children and adolescents. These findings underline the importance for continued vaccine surveillance and the need for further studies to confirm these results and to determine their clinical implications in public health decision-making, especially for younger populations.

Interventions for COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Vaccines effectively protect against COVID-19, but vaccine hesitancy and refusal hinder vaccination rates. This systematic review aimed to (1) review and describe current interventions for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy/refusal and (2) assess whether these interventions are effective for increasing vaccine uptake. The protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO and comprehensive search included Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases. Only studies that evaluated the effectiveness of non-financial interventions to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were included, while those focusing intentions or financial incentive were excluded. Risk of bias for all included studies was evaluated using Cochrane risk of bias tools. In total, six articles were included in the review (total participants n = 200,720). A narrative synthesis was performed due to the absence of common quantitative metrics. Except for one randomized controlled trial, all studies reported that interventions were effective, increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates. However, non-randomized studies were subject to confounding biases. Evidence on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy interventions remains limited and further evidence is needed for the development of clear guidance on effective interventions to increase vaccine uptake.

Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in mRNA COVID-19-vaccinated and unvaccinated populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To summarise the available evidence on the risk of myocarditis and/or pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, compared with the risk among unvaccinated individuals in the absence of COVID-19 infection. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and WHO Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease), preprint repositories (medRxiv and bioRxiv), reference lists and grey literature were searched from 1 December 2020 until 31 October 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Epidemiological studies of individuals of any age who received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, reported a risk of myo/pericarditis and compared the risk of myo/pericarditis to individuals who did not receive any dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. The rate of myo/pericarditis among vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was recorded, and the rate ratios were calculated. Additionally, the total number of individuals, case ascertainment criteria, percentage of males and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were extracted for each study. Meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, of which six were included in the quantitative synthesis. Our meta-analysis indicates that within 30-day follow-up period, vaccinated individuals were twice as likely to develop myo/pericarditis in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals, with a rate ratio of 2.05 (95% CI 1.49-2.82). CONCLUSION: Although the absolute number of observed myo/pericarditis cases remains quite low, a higher risk was detected in those who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations compared with unvaccinated individuals in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given the effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing severe illnesses, hospitalisations and deaths, future research should focus on accurately determining the rates of myo/pericarditis linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, understanding the biological mechanisms behind these rare cardiac events and identifying those most at risk.

Disproportionality analysis of adverse neurological and psychiatric reactions with the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Information on neurological and psychiatric adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) with COVID-19 vaccines is limited. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: We examined and compared neurological and psychiatric AEFIS reports related to BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) COVID-19 vaccines and recorded in the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between 9 December 2020 and 30 June 2021. RESULTS: As of 30 June 2021, 46.1 million doses of ChAdOx1 and 30.3 million doses of BNT162b2 had been administered. The most frequently reported AEFI was headache with 1,686 and 575 cases per million doses of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2, respectively. AEFIs more frequently reported after CHAdOx1 compared with BNT162b2 vaccination were Guillain-Barré syndrome (OR, 95% CI = 2.53, 1.82-3.51), freezing (6.66, 3.12-14.22), cluster headache (1.53, 1.28-1.84), migraine (1.23,1.17-1.30), postural dizziness (1.24,1.13-1.37), tremor (2.86, 2.68-3.05), headache (1.40, 1.38-1.43), paresthesia (1.11, 1.06-1.16), delirium (1.85, 1.45-2.36), hallucination (2.20, 1.82-2.66), poor quality sleep (1.53, 1.26-1.85), and nervousness (1.54, 1.26-1.89) Reactions less frequently reported with ChAdOx1 than with BNT162b2 were Bell's palsy (0.47, 0.41-0.55), anosmia (0.58, 0.47-0.71), facial paralysis (0.35, 0.29-0.41), dysgeusia (0.68, 0.62-0.73), presyncope (0.48, 0.42-0.55), syncope (0.63, 0.58-0.67), and anxiety (0.75 (0.67-0.85). CONCLUSION: Neurological and psychiatric AEFIs were relatively infrequent, but each vaccine was associated with a distinctive toxic profile.

We examined reports on adverse neurological and psychiatric effects following immunization with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) for COVID-19 to the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between 9 December 2020 and 30 June 2021. Adverse effects following immunization (AEFIs) were relatively infrequent. Compared to BNT162b2, Guillain-Barré syndrome, freezing phenomenon, cluster headache, migraine, postural dizziness, tremor, headache, paresthesia, delirium, hallucination, poor quality sleep, and nervousness were more frequently reported for ChAdOx1. Reactions less frequently reported for ChAdOx1 than for BNT162b2 were Bell's palsy, anosmia, facial paralysis, dysgeusia, presyncope, syncope, and anxiety.

Safety and effectiveness of NMDA receptor antagonists for depression: A multidisciplinary review.

Ketamine, an anesthetic available since 1970, and esketamine, its newer S-enantiomer, provide a novel approach for the treatment of depression and other psychiatric disorders. At subanesthetic doses, the two drugs, along with their older congener, phencyclidine (PCP), induce a transient, altered mental state by blocking the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor for glutamate, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. This multidisciplinary review examines the pharmacology/direct effects on consciousness, effectiveness in depression and acute suicidality, and safety of these fast-acting NMDA antagonists. To capture the essence of 60 years of peer-reviewed literature, we used a semi-structured approach to the subtopics, each of which required a different search strategy. We review the evidence for the three primary reported benefits of the two clinical drugs when used for depression: success in difficult-to-treat patients, rapid onset of action within a day, and immediate effects on suicidality. Key safety issues include the evidence-and lack thereof-for the effects of repeatedly inducing this altered mental state, and whether an adequate safety margin exists to rule out the neurotoxic effects seen in animal studies. This review includes evidence from multiple sources that raise substantial questions about both safety and effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for psychiatric disorders.

Risk of Myocarditis and Pericarditis among Young Adults following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinations.

There have been reports of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis as rare complications following mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations among young adults. While most reported cases are mild, this potential vaccine safety signal should be closely monitored. Using data from the CDC and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), we calculated the combined reporting rate of myocarditis and pericarditis stratified by age group, sex, vaccine dose, and manufacturer, and compared these rates to the crude background incidence rates. Compared to the general population prior to the administration of the first COVID-19 vaccines in December 2020, we identified a higher-than-expected reporting rate of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination; the risk was higher after a second vaccine dose, higher in males than in females, and decreased with age. The highest risk was seen in males 12-17 years of age with approximately 6 cases per 100,000 second doses. Our findings suggest an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in young males following a second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Since these findings are based on safety signals derived from passive surveillance data, confirmatory epidemiological studies should be undertaken.

Systemic quinolones and risk of retinal detachment I: analysis of data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Quinolones comprise a class of antibiotics that are globally preferred for treating a wide range of bacterial infections due to their potency, broad coverage, favorable pharmacologic profile, and mostly mild to moderate adverse reactions. Spontaneous reports on adverse drug events (ADE) and data from some pharmacoepidemiologic studies have raised concerns regarding quinolones and risk of retinal detachment (RD). This study examined ADE reports submitted to FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) for evidence on quinolone-associated RD risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all RD reports in FAERS between 2010-2019. We compared ADE signals between quinolones and selected medications that were previously associated with RD, and with reference medications not known to cause RD. For signal detection, we used two techniques: the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), which are known for their higher sensitivity and specificity for ADE signal detection, respectively. RESULTS: Moxifloxacin showed a positive and significant PRR signal for RD [PRR: 2.54 (1.60, 4.04)], and a marginally significant EBGM signal [EBGM: 2.21 (1.41, 3.02)]. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin is the only quinolone showing a positive disproportionality signal for RD. Further epidemiologic research is needed to clarify the association between moxifloxacin and RD risk.

Systemic quinolones and risk of acute liver failure I: Analysis of data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Quinolones are a potent and globally popular group of antibiotics that are used to treat a wide range of infections. Some case reports have raised concern about their possible association with acute hepatic failure (AHF). Data from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System were evaluated for signals of AHF in association with systemically administered quinolone antibiotics. METHODS: AHF reports between 1969 and 2019q2, with a focus on 2010-2019q2, were analyzed. Specifically, AHF reports linked to non-quinolone antibiotics of known hepatotoxicity were compared to reports with non-quinolone, non-hepatotoxic (reference) antibiotics; and AHF reports with quinolones were also compared to reports with the same group of reference antibiotics. Two disproportionality signal detection techniques (proportional reporting ratio, PRR, and empirical Bayes geometric mean, EBGM) were used to assess the AHF signal for both analyses. RESULTS: Only ciprofloxacin showed a marginal and significant AHF signal (PRR: 1.85 [1.21, 2.81]; EBGM: 1.54 [1.06, 1.81]); moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin showed weak and nonsignificant signals. CONCLUSION: Further pharmacovigilance studies are required to confirm the association between ciprofloxacin and AHF seen in the present analysis.