Study of dog control strategies.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To explore the relationship between regionally implemented dog control strategies and dog bite injuries (DBIs) and (2) to evaluate current implementation of dog control strategies. METHODS: Observational study using a nationwide online survey of territorial authorities (TAs). Domains of interest included complaints for attacks on people, dog population, primary and secondary prevention strategies, resourcing and perspectives of current strategies. Quantitative variables were compared with DBI Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) claims by region from 2014 to 2018. RESULTS: Two-thirds of TAs (70%; n=47/67) responded to the survey. No clear relationship was observed between DBIs and: registered dog population, proportion sterilisations or microchipping, classifications due to dog behaviour, or existing limited resourcing. Legislated breeds and infringements for failure to control a dog or non-registration were higher in areas with greater DBIs. Educational messages varied widely and were predominantly victim directed (67%; n=71/106). Complaints for dog attacks on people were lower than DBIs in most areas, with no formal cross-agency notification policies. Few prosecutions or dog destruction orders were made. CONCLUSIONS: Regional inequity in DBIs could not be explained by differences in the registered dog population or dog control strategies. Minimal and inequitable resourcing exists to implement current dog control strategies and provide owner-directed education. Gaps in legislation include environmental barrier requirements for all dogs (leash/muzzle use, adequate fencing), notification of incidents and child protection. Partnership with the Indigenous community (Maori) and other community groups will be required to implement these measures successfully.

The societal cost of unintentional childhood injuries in Aotearoa.

AIMS: To estimate the burden and inequity of unintentional childhood injury for children in Aotearoa. METHODS: We used administrative data from the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) and the Ministry of Health to estimate the direct, indirect and intangible costs of unintentional injuries in children aged under 15 and the inequity of the impact of childhood injury on discretionary household income. We used an incidence approach and attributed all costs arising from injuries to the year in which those injuries were sustained. RESULTS: 257,000 children experienced unintentional injury in 2014, resulting in direct and indirect costs of almost $400 million. The burden of lost health and premature death was the equivalent of almost 200 full lives at perfect health. Pacific children had the highest incidence rates. Maori had the lowest rates of ACC claims but the highest rate of emergency department attendance. Children living with the highest levels of socioeconomic deprivation had the highest rate of hospital admission following injury. The proportional loss in discretionary income arising from an injury was higher for Maori and Pacific compared to non-Maori, non-Pacific households. CONCLUSION: The burden of unintentional childhood injury is greater than previously reported and has a substantial and iniquitous societal impact. There should be a focus on addressing inequities in incidence and access to care in order to reduce inequities in health and financial impact.