Feasibility of cardiac-synchronized quantitative T1 and T2 mapping on a hybrid 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system.

Background and Purpose: The heart is important in radiotherapy either as target or organ at risk. Quantitative T1 and T2 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) may aid in target definition for cardiac radioablation, and imaging biomarker for cardiotoxicity assessment. Hybrid MR-linac devices could facilitate daily cardiac qMRI of the heart in radiotherapy. The aim of this work was therefore to enable cardiac-synchronized T1 and T2 mapping on a 1.5 T MR-linac and test the reproducibility of these sequences on phantoms and in vivo between the MR-linac and a diagnostic 1.5 T MRI scanner. Materials and methods: Cardiac-synchronized MRI was performed on the MR-linac using a wireless peripheral pulse-oximeter unit. Diagnostically used T1 and T2 mapping sequences were acquired twice on the MR-linac and on a 1.5 T MR-simulator for a gel phantom and 5 healthy volunteers in breath-hold. Phantom T1 and T2 values were compared to gold-standard measurements and percentage errors (PE) were computed, where negative/positive PE indicate underestimations/overestimations. Manually selected regions-of-interest were used for in vivo intra/inter scanner evaluation. Results: Cardiac-synchronized T1 and T2 qMRI was enabled after successful hardware installation on the MR-linac. From the phantom experiments, the measured T1/T2 relaxation times had a maximum percentage error (PE) of -4.4%/-8.8% on the MR-simulator and a maximum PE of -3.2%/+8.6% on the MR-linac. Mean T1/T2 of the myocardium were 1012 ± 34/51 ± 2 ms on the MR-simulator and 1034 ± 42/51 ± 1 ms on the MR-linac. Conclusions: Accurate cardiac-synchronized T1 and T2 mapping is feasible on a 1.5 T MR-linac and might enable novel plan adaptation workflows and cardiotoxicity assessments.

Comparison of Motion-Insensitive T2-Weighted MRI Pulse Sequences for Visualization of the Prostatic Urethra During MR Simulation.

PURPOSE: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiation therapy simulation is growing because of its ability to provide excellent delineation of target tissue and organs at risk. With the use of hypofractionated schemes in prostate cancer, urethral sparing is essential; however, visualization of the prostatic urethra can be challenging because of the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia as well as respiratory motion artifacts. The goal of this study was to compare the utility of 2 motion-insensitive, T2-weighted MRI pulse sequences for urethra visualization in the setting of MRI-based simulation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients undergoing MRI simulation without Foley catheters were imaged on a 3 Tesla MRI scanner between October 2018 and January 2019. Sagittal multislice data were acquired using (1) MultiVane XD radial sampling with parallel imaging acceleration (MVXD) and (2) single-shot fast-spin-echo (SSFSE) sequences with acquisition times of 2 to 3 minutes per sequence. For each examination, 2 genitourinary radiologists scored prostatic urethra visibility on a 1-to-5 scale and rated the signal-to-noise ratio and the presence of artifacts in each series. RESULTS: Urethral visibility was scored higher in the MVXD series than in the SSFSE series in 18 of 22 cases (Reader 1) and 17 of 22 cases (Reader 2). The differences in scores between MVXD and SSFSE were statistically significant for both readers (P < .0001 for both, paired Student's t-test) and interobserver agreement was high (Cohen's kappa = 0.67). Both readers found the signal-to-noise ratio of the MVXD sequence to be superior in all cases. The MVXD sequence was found to generate more artifacts than the SSFSE sequence, but these tended to appear in the periphery and did not affect the ability to visualize the urethra. CONCLUSIONS: A radial T2-weighted multislice pulse sequence was superior to an SSFSE sequence for visualization of the urethra in the setting of magnetic resonance simulation for prostate cancer.

Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose (0.1 mmol/kg) peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression and compare it with conventional subtraction MRA in terms of image quality. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (13 male, 15 female; mean age ± standard deviation, 66 ± 16 years) with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease underwent subtractionless and subtraction first-pass MRA at 1.5 T using two-point Dixon fat suppression. Results were compared with regard to vessel-to-background contrast. A phantom study was performed to assess the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of both MRA techniques. Two experienced observers scored subjective image quality. Agreement regarding subjective image quality was expressed in quadratic weighted κ values. RESULTS: Vessel-to-background contrast improved in all anatomical locations with the subtractionless method versus the subtraction method (all P < 0.001). Subjective image quality was uniformly higher with the subtractionless method (all P < 0.03, except for the aorto-iliac arteries for observer 1, P = 0.052). SNR was 15 % higher with the subtractionless method (31.9 vs 27.6). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose lower extremity MRA. Moreover, both objective and subjective image quality are better than with subtraction MRA. KEY POINTS: • MRA is increasingly used for vascular applications. • Dixon imaging offers an alternative to image subtraction for fat suppression. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA is possible using two-point Dixon fat suppression. • Subtractionless peripheral MRA is possible at 1.5 T a single contrast medium dose. • Subtractionless first-pass peripheral MRA provides good image quality with few non-diagnostic studies.