Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 115
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 50(3): 135-141, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483328

RESUMEN

In this discussion paper, we describe the history of the science and societal action resulting in the mitigation of neurotoxic disorders from exposure to organic solvents at the workplaces in Sweden. When alkyd paints were introduced in large scale in construction painting in the 1960s and 1970s, Scandinavian unions voiced increasing concern as members reported symptoms like headache and vertigo, supported by participatory studies and case studies. Although acute and chronic neurotoxic effects were established for some specific solvents such as carbon disulphide, this was not the case for those used in the new paints. Union advocacy promoted formal epidemiological studies, providing increasing evidence for chronic neurotoxicity at levels far below current occupational exposure levels. The results were widely disseminated and accepted and led to concerted action with preventive measures, most importantly substitution of the organic solvents in paints for indoor use, but also drastic reductions in occupational exposure limits. The findings also resulted in funding of further research on solvent toxicity and the establishment of expert groups to advice authorities on occupational standards for exposure to chemicals. The substitution strategy was subsequently adopted in many other countries and occupational exposure limits were lowered, although several years or even decades later. While the societal context in Sweden was unique in many ways, we conclude that there are lessons to be learned from this preventive success when addressing current challenges.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Solventes/toxicidad , Suecia
2.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 256: 114298, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38056371

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is classified as a human carcinogen. Occupational Cr(VI) exposure can occur during different work processes, but the current exposure to Cr(VI) at Swedish workplaces is unknown. METHODS: This cross-sectional study (SafeChrom) recruited non-smoking men and women from 14 companies with potential Cr(VI) exposure (n = 113) and controls from 6 companies without Cr(VI) exposure (n = 72). Inhalable Cr(VI) was measured by personal air sampling (outside of respiratory protection) in exposed workers. Total Cr was measured in urine (pre- and post-shift, density-adjusted) and red blood cells (RBC) (reflecting Cr(VI)) in exposed workers and controls. The Bayesian tool Expostats was used to assess risk and evaluate occupational exposure limit (OEL) compliance. RESULTS: The exposed workers performed processing of metal products, steel production, welding, plating, and various chemical processes. The geometric mean concentration of inhalable Cr(VI) in exposed workers was 0.15 µg/m3 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.21). Eight of the 113 exposed workers (7%) exceeded the Swedish OEL of 5 µg/m3, and the Bayesian analysis estimated the share of OEL exceedances up to 19.6% for stainless steel welders. Median post-shift urinary (0.60 µg/L, 5th-95th percentile 0.10-3.20) and RBC concentrations (0.73 µg/L, 0.51-2.33) of Cr were significantly higher in the exposed group compared with the controls (urinary 0.10 µg/L, 0.06-0.56 and RBC 0.53 µg/L, 0.42-0.72). Inhalable Cr(VI) correlated with urinary Cr (rS = 0.64) and RBC-Cr (rS = 0.53). Workers within steel production showed the highest concentrations of inhalable, urinary and RBC Cr. Workers with inferred non-acceptable local exhaustion ventilation showed significantly higher inhalable Cr(VI), urinary and RBC Cr concentrations compared with those with inferred acceptable ventilation. Furthermore, workers with inferred correct use of respiratory protection were exposed to significantly higher concentrations of Cr(VI) in air and had higher levels of Cr in urine and RBC than those assessed with incorrect or no use. Based on the Swedish job-exposure-matrix, approximately 17 900 workers were estimated to be occupationally exposed to Cr(VI) today. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that some workers in Sweden are exposed to high levels of the non-threshold carcinogen Cr(VI). Employers and workers seem aware of Cr(VI) exposure, but more efficient exposure control strategies are required. National strategies aligned with the European strategies are needed in order to eliminate this cause of occupational cancer.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire , Exposición Profesional , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Suecia , Estudios Transversales , Teorema de Bayes , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Cromo/orina , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Acero Inoxidable/análisis , Carcinógenos
4.
Scand J Public Health ; : 14034948231198285, 2023 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37723969

RESUMEN

AIM: To explore how overcrowding affects children's health, environment and schooling. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with individual interviews among 20 participants with occupational experience from overcrowded Stockholm areas but diverse in professions, locations and employers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed with Systematic Text Condensation. RESULTS: Almost all participants expressed that overcrowding has a negative impact on children's health, environment and schooling - based on perceptions of precarious and different living conditions for children in overcrowded areas, for example, substandard homes, vulnerability, stress, exclusion, limited resources, lack of learning opportunities, gender differences, confinement, shame, insecurity, conflicts, risk of criminality, and bodily impact, both physical and psychological. CONCLUSIONS: Our qualitative evidence suggest that overcrowding has a negative impact on children's health, environment and schooling.

5.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 77(11): 736-743, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37620008

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed at estimating the causal effect of switching from precarious to standard employment on the 6-year and 12-year risk of all-cause mortality among workers aged 20-55 years in Sweden. METHODS: We emulated a series of 12 target trials starting every year between 2005 and 2016 using Swedish register data (n=251 273). We classified precariously employed individuals using a multidimensional approach at baseline as (1) remaining in precarious employment (PE) (73.8%) and (2) shifting to standard employment (26.2%). All-cause mortality was measured from 2006 to 2017. We pooled data for all 12 emulated trials and used covariate-adjusted pooled logistic regression to estimate intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects via risk ratios (RRs) and standardised risk curves (the parametric g-formula). RESULTS: Shifting from precarious to standard employment decreases the 12-year risk of death by 20% on the relative scale (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73; 0.93), regardless of what happens after the initial shift. However, we estimated a 12-year risk reduction of 30% on the relative scale for workers shifting from precarious to standard employment and staying within this employment category for the full 12 years (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54; 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study finds that shifting from low to higher-quality employment conditions (ie, stable employment, sufficient income levels and high coverage by collective agreements) decreases the risk of death. Remaining in PE increases the risk of premature mortality. Our results emphasise the necessity of ensuring decent work for the entire working population to accomplish the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Mortalidad Prematura , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Causalidad , Modelos Logísticos
6.
Environ Int ; 178: 108108, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490787

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Environmental noise is an important environmental exposure that can affect health. An association between transportation noise and breast cancer incidence has been suggested, although current evidence is limited. We investigated the pooled association between long-term exposure to transportation noise and breast cancer incidence. METHODS: Pooled data from eight Nordic cohorts provided a study population of 111,492 women. Road, railway, and aircraft noise were modelled at residential addresses. Breast cancer incidence (all, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and ER negative) was derived from cancer registries. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, adjusting main models for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables together with long-term exposure to air pollution. RESULTS: A total of 93,859 women were included in the analyses, of whom 5,875 developed breast cancer. The median (5th-95th percentile) 5-year residential road traffic noise was 54.8 (40.0-67.8) dB Lden, and among those exposed, the median railway noise was 51.0 (41.2-65.8) dB Lden. We observed a pooled HR for breast cancer (95 % confidence interval (CI)) of 1.03 (0.99-1.06) per 10 dB increase in 5-year mean exposure to road traffic noise, and 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.96-1.11) for railway noise, after adjustment for lifestyle and sociodemographic covariates. HRs remained unchanged in analyses with further adjustment for PM2.5 and attenuated when adjusted for NO2 (HRs from 1.02 to 1.01), in analyses using the same sample. For aircraft noise, no association was observed. The associations did not vary by ER status for any noise source. In analyses using <60 dB as a cutoff, we found HRs of 1.08 (0.99-1.18) for road traffic and 1.19 (0.95-1.49) for railway noise. CONCLUSIONS: We found weak associations between road and railway noise and breast cancer risk. More high-quality prospective studies are needed, particularly among those exposed to railway and aircraft noise before conclusions regarding noise as a risk factor for breast cancer can be made.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ruido del Transporte , Humanos , Femenino , Ruido del Transporte/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Prospectivos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis
7.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(6): 439-448, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37436135

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate effects of night and shift work patterns on type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension in a longitudinal study, with detailed information on working hours. METHODS: The cohort comprised about 28 000 nurses and nursing assistants employed for more than one year 2008-2016 in Stockholm, Sweden. The employee register held detailed individual information on daily working hours. Information on diagnoses came from national and regional registers. Hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by discrete-time proportional hazard models, adjusting for sex, age, country of birth, and profession. RESULTS: During follow-up in 2013-2017, we identified 232 cases of T2D and 875 of hypertension. We observed an increased risk of T2D, but not hypertension, among employees who worked only night shifts the previous year (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.43) and those with intensive shift work (>120 afternoon and/or night shifts the previous year: HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.11-2.48) compared to only day work. There was a non-significantly increased risk of T2D related to mixed day and afternoon shifts (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.97-1.88). We observed tendencies in increased risk of T2D related to frequent spells of ≥3 consecutive night shifts and with number of years with exclusive (but not mixed) night work. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent night work and frequent afternoon and/or night shifts were associated with an increased risk of T2D the following year, but not hypertension. The T2D risk was, to some extent, affected by frequent spells of several night shifts in a row and by cumulative years with permanent night work.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipertensión , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos/efectos adversos , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud
8.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(6): 386-394, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37417898

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether workplace factors and occupations are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19 in the later waves of the pandemic. METHODS: We studied 552 562 cases with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 in the Swedish registry of communicable diseases, and 5985 cases with severe COVID-19 based on hospital admissions from October 2020 to December 2021. Four population controls were assigned the index dates of their corresponding cases. We linked job histories to job-exposure matrices to assess the odds for different transmission dimensions and different occupations. We used adjusted conditional logistic analyses to estimate odds ratios (OR) for severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The highest OR for severe COVID-19 were for: regular contact with infected patients, (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.54), close physical proximity (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34-1.61), and high exposure to diseases or infections (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.52-1.96). Mostly working outside had lower OR (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.06). The odds for SARS-CoV-2 when mostly working outside were similar (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.86). The occupation with the highest OR for severe COVID-19 (compared with low-exposure occupations) was certified specialist physician (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21) among women and bus and tram drivers (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.49-2.79) among men. CONCLUSIONS: Contact with infected patients, close proximity and crowded workplaces increase the risks for severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Outdoor work is associated with decreased odds for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 96(8): 1137-1147, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37450035

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Job demands and control at work and their combination, job strain, have been studied in relation to risk of disability pension (DP) previously. In the present study, based on registry data, we aimed to deepen the knowledge by analyzing major disease groups among the DPs, dose-response shape of the associations, and potential confounding effects of physical workload. METHODS: Approximately 1.8 million workers aged 44 or older and living in Sweden in 2005 were followed up for 16 years, up to a maximum of 65 years of age. We linked mean values of job demands and job control, estimated in a job-exposure matrice (JEM) by gender, to individuals through their occupational titles in 2005. These values were categorized by rank order, and, for the construction of job-strain quadrants, we used a median cut-off. Associations with DP were estimated in Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: In models accounting for covariates including physical workload, low levels of job control were associated with higher risk of DP among both men and women. This association was most clear for DP with a psychiatric diagnosis, although a dose-response shape was found only among the men. High levels of job demands were associated with decreased risk of DP across diagnoses among men, but the same association varied from weak to non-existing among women. The high- and passive job-strain quadrants both showed increased risk of DP with a psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that, at the occupational level, low job control, but not high job demands, contributes to an increased incidence of DP, particularly regarding DP with a psychiatric diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Pensiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(7): 377-383, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37193595

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether crowded workplaces, sharing surfaces and exposure to infections were factors associated with a positive test for influenza virus. METHODS: We studied 11 300 cases with a positive test for influenza A and 3671 cases of influenza B from Swedish registry of communicable diseases. Six controls for each case were selected from the population registry, with each control being assigned the index date of their corresponding case. We linked job histories to job-exposure matrices (JEMs), to assess different transmission dimensions of influenza and risks for different occupations compared with occupations that the JEM classifies as low exposed. We used adjusted conditional logistic analyses to estimate the ORs for influenza with 95% CI. RESULTS: The highest odds were for influenza were: regular contact with infected patients (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.73); never maintained social distance (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.59); frequently sharing materials/surfaces with the general public (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.48); close physical proximity (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.62) and high exposure to diseases or infections (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.64). There were small differences between influenza A and influenza B. The five occupations with the highest odds as compared with low exposed occupations were: primary care physicians, protective service workers, elementary workers, medical and laboratory technicians, and taxi drivers. CONCLUSIONS: Contact with infected patients, low social distance and sharing surfaces are dimensions that increase risk for influenza A and B. Further safety measures are needed to diminish viral transmission in these contexts.


Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Ocupaciones , Lugar de Trabajo
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(7): 372-376, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137691

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Night work has been classified as probably carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, but epidemiological evidence was considered limited due to variability in findings and potential bias. This study aimed to investigate the risk of breast cancer in a cohort with detailed and registry-based data on night work. METHODS: The cohort comprised 25 585 women (nurses and nursing assistants) employed 1 year or more between 2008 and 2016 in the healthcare sector in Stockholm. Information on work schedules was obtained from employment records. Breast cancer cases were identified from the national cancer register. HRs were estimated by a discrete time proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, country of birth, profession and childbirth. RESULTS: There were 299 cases of breast cancer, 147 in premenopausal and 152 in postmenopausal women. The adjusted HR of postmenopausal breast cancer in association with ever versus never working nights was 1.31 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.85). Eight or more years of night work was associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, HR=4.33 (95% CI 1.45 to 10.57), based on five cases only, though. CONCLUSIONS: This study is limited by a short period of follow-up and a lack of information on night work before 2008. Most exposure metrics showed no association with breast cancer risk, but there was an elevated risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in women after 8 or more years of night work.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Atención a la Salud
12.
Environ Res ; 224: 115454, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764429

RESUMEN

Background Colon cancer incidence is rising globally, and factors pertaining to urbanization have been proposed involved in this development. Traffic noise may increase colon cancer risk by causing sleep disturbance and stress, thereby inducing known colon cancer risk-factors, e.g. obesity, diabetes, physical inactivity, and alcohol consumption, but few studies have examined this. Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the association between traffic noise and colon cancer (all, proximal, distal) in a pooled population of 11 Nordic cohorts, totaling 155,203 persons. Methods We identified residential address history and estimated road, railway, and aircraft noise, as well as air pollution, for all addresses, using similar exposure models across cohorts. Colon cancer cases were identified through national registries. We analyzed data using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, adjusting main models for harmonized sociodemographic and lifestyle data. Results During follow-up (median 18.8 years), 2757 colon cancer cases developed. We found a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.10) per 10-dB higher 5-year mean time-weighted road traffic noise. In sub-type analyses, the association seemed confined to distal colon cancer: HR 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98-1.14). Railway and aircraft noise was not associated with colon cancer, albeit there was some indication in sub-type analyses that railway noise may also be associated with distal colon cancer. In interaction-analyses, the association between road traffic noise and colon cancer was strongest among obese persons and those with high NO2-exposure. Discussion A prominent study strength is the large population with harmonized data across eleven cohorts, and the complete address-history during follow-up. However, each cohort estimated noise independently, and only at the most exposed façade, which may introduce exposure misclassification. Despite this, the results of this pooled study suggest that traffic noise may be a risk factor for colon cancer, especially of distal origin.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire , Neoplasias del Colon , Ruido del Transporte , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Dinamarca/epidemiología
13.
Environ Health Perspect ; 131(1): 17003, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36607286

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transportation noise may induce cardiovascular disease, but the public health implications are unclear. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess exposure-response relationships for different transportation noise sources and ischemic heart disease (IHD), including subtypes. METHODS: Pooled analyses were performed of nine cohorts from Denmark and Sweden, together including 132,801 subjects. Time-weighted long-term exposure to road, railway, and aircraft noise, as well as air pollution, was estimated based on residential histories. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models following adjustment for lifestyle and socioeconomic risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 22,459 incident cases of IHD were identified during follow-up from national patient and mortality registers, including 7,682 cases of myocardial infarction. The adjusted HR for IHD was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00, 1.05] per 10 dB Lden for both road and railway noise exposure during 5 y prior to the event. Higher risks were indicated for IHD excluding angina pectoris cases, with HRs of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.08) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.08) per 10 dB Lden for road and railway noise, respectively. Corresponding HRs for myocardial infarction were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.05) and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.08). Increased risks were observed for aircraft noise but without clear exposure-response relations. A threshold at around 55 dB Lden was suggested in the exposure-response relation for road traffic noise and IHD. DISCUSSION: Exposure to road, railway, and aircraft noise in the prior 5 y was associated with an increased risk of IHD, particularly after exclusion of angina pectoris cases, which are less well identified in the registries. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10745.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Isquemia Miocárdica , Ruido del Transporte , Humanos , Ruido del Transporte/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Angina de Pecho
14.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(2): 145-154, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36409488

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Construction workers are exposed to respirable dust, including respirable crystalline silica (RCS), which is a potential risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether exposure to particles among construction workers is associated with short- and long-term alterations in CVD-related serum proteins. METHODS: Using proximity extension assay, we measured 92 serum proteins linked to CVD among active male construction workers (N=65, non-smokers) sampled on two occasions: during work and after vacation. First, we used linear models to identify short-term changes in proteins associated with particle exposure (assessed as respirable dust and RCS) during work. Secondly, we used linear mixed models to evaluate whether these associations were long-term, ie, persistent after vacation. RESULTS: The median exposure to respirable dust and RCS during work were 0.25 mg/m3 and 0.01 mg/m3, respectively. Respirable dust was associated with short-term changes in six proteins (tissue factor, growth hormone, heme oxygenase-1, dickkopf-related protein-1, platelet-derived growth factor-B, stem cell factor); long-term associations were observed for the former three proteins. RCS was associated with short-term changes in five proteins (carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule-8, hydroxyacid oxidase-1, tissue factor, carbonic anhydrase-5A, lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1); long-term associations were observed for the former four proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate exposure to particles in the construction industry is associated with both short- and long-term changes in circulating CVD-related proteins. Further studies are needed to evaluate if these changes are predictors of occupationally induced clinical CVD.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Exposición Profesional , Masculino , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Dióxido de Silicio/análisis , Proteínas Sanguíneas , Polvo/análisis
15.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(1): 84-94, 2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36228167

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mounting evidence indicates increased risk of COVID-19 among healthcare personnel, but the evidence on risks in other occupations is limited. In this study, we quantify the occupational risk of COVID-19-related hospital admission in Denmark during 2020-2021. METHODS: The source population included 2.4 million employees age 20-69 years. All information was retrieved from public registers. The risk of COVID-19 related hospital admission was examined in 155 occupations with at least 2000 employees (at-risk, N=1 620 231) referenced to a group of mainly office workers defined by a COVID-19 job exposure matrix (N=369 341). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were computed by Poisson regression. RESULTS: During 186 million person-weeks of follow-up, we observed 2944 COVID-19 related hospital admissions in at-risk occupations and 559 in referents. Adjusted risk of such admission was elevated in several occupations within healthcare (including health care assistants, nurses, medical practitioners and laboratory technicians but not physiotherapists or midwives), social care (daycare assistants for children aged 4-7, and nursing aides in institutions and private homes, but not family daycare workers) and transportation (bus drivers, but not lorry drivers). Most IRR in these at-risk occupations were in the range of 1.5-3. Employees in education, retail sales and various service occupations seemed not to be at risk. CONCLUSION: Employees in several occupations within and outside healthcare are at substantially increased risk of COVID-19. There is a need to revisit safety measures and precautions to mitigate viral transmission in the workplace during the current and forthcoming pandemics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ocupaciones , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Hospitales
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(1): 65-74, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36385261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Working in close contacts with coworkers or the general public may be associated with transmission of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). We investigated whether crowded workplaces, sharing surfaces, and exposure to infections were factors associated with IPD. METHODS: We studied 3,968 cases of IPD, and selected six controls for each case from the Swedish population registry with each control being assigned the index date of their corresponding case. We linked job histories to job-exposure matrices to assess different transmission dimensions of pneumococci, as well as occupational exposure to fumes. We used adjusted conditional logistic analyses to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for IPD with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: ORs for IPD for the different transmission dimensions were increased moderately but were statistically significant. Compared to home-working or working alone, the highest odds was for Working mostly outside, or partly inside (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.38). Estimates were higher in men for all dimensions, compared to women. The odds for IPD for Working mostly outside, or partly inside were 1.33 (95% CI 1.13-1.56) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.55-1.14) for men and women, respectively. Higher odds were seen for all transmission dimensions among those exposed to fumes, although CIs included unity. Contact with ill or infected patients did not increase the odds for IPD. CONCLUSION: IPD was associated with working in close contact with coworkers or the general public, and with outside work, especially for men. Contact with infected patients or persons was not associated with IPD.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Oportunidad Relativa , Gases
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36232108

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to identify trends in precarious employment in the Swedish workforce from 1992 to 2017. This is a repeated cross-sectional study, analyzing the total working population aged 16-75 in Sweden at five-year intervals. We used version 2.0 of the Swedish Register-based Operationalization of Precarious Employment, covering the following dimensions: employment insecurity, income inadequacy, lack of rights and protection. The proportion in precarious employment increased from 9.7 to 12% between 1992 and 2017, a relative increase of 24%. The prevalence was higher among those of lower age, of low education, and immigrants. Differences between sexes converged, and there were slightly more precarious men than women in 2017. The relative increase was most pronounced among men, especially those with low educational attainment and of European origin. The increasing proportion of precarious employees is a clear challenge to the tripartite Nordic model, which requires sufficient trade-union bargaining power.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Masculino , Suecia
18.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 48(7): 520-529, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35723926

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effects of various aspects of night and shift work on the risk of incident ischemic heart disease (IHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) using detailed and registry-based exposure data. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included >30 300 healthcare employees (eg, nurses, nursing assistants) employed for at least one year in Region Stockholm 2008-2016. Information on daily working hours was obtained from a computerized administrative employee register and outcomes from national and regional registers. Using discrete-time proportional hazard models, we analyzed the outcomes as functions of working hour characteristics the preceding year, adjusted for sex, age, country of birth, education, and profession. RESULTS: We observed 223 cases of IHD and 281 cases of AF during follow-up 2009-2016. The risk of IHD was increased among employees who the preceding year had permanent night shifts compared to those with permanent day work [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.43] and among employees working night shifts >120 times per year compared to those who never worked night (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.21). When restricted to non-night workers, the risk of IHD was increased for employees having frequent quick returns from afternoon shifts. No increased risks were observed for AF. CONCLUSIONS: Night work, especially working permanent night shifts and frequent night shifts, is associated with an increased risk of incident IHD but not AF. Moreover, frequent quick returns from afternoon shifts (among non-night workers) increased IHD risk. Organizing work schedules to minimize these exposures may reduce IHD risk.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Isquemia Miocárdica , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Horario de Trabajo por Turnos/efectos adversos , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado
19.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 48(6): 479-489, 2022 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35696552

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated time trends in occupational exposure to various chemicals in Sweden and the distribution across demographic and labor market sectors. METHODS: Exposure to six chemicals was investigated from 1980 to 2013 by application of a job exposure matrix to national population registers. Respirable crystalline silica (RCS), diesel engine exhaust, welding fumes, wood dust, chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, and lead were selected to represent different groups of chemicals. Trends in exposure prevalence were investigated by linear regression and compared to the occupationally active population. Confidence intervals for the rate of change over time were obtained by bootstrapping. RESULTS: The proportion of workers born outside the Nordic countries increased over time in those exposed to RCS, diesel exhaust and wood dust. There was a shift of exposed jobs to small companies (<50 employees), especially for RCS, welding fumes, wood dust, and chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents. For RCS and welding fumes, there was a marked drop in exposure levels from 1980 to 1990 but small changes thereafter. Exposure to lead diminished, both in terms of prevalence and intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, several exposures tended to shift to small companies, the construction sector, and migrant workers, all factors being indicative of less well-controlled working conditions. Occupational exposure to chlorinated organic solvents and lead diminished, while exposure levels to RCS and welding fumes have changed little since 1990. In view of the serious and well-established negative health effects, increased efforts to reduce exposure to RCS and welding fumes are needed.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire , Exposición Profesional , Soldadura , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Demografía , Polvo/análisis , Gases , Humanos , Plomo , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Solventes , Suecia/epidemiología
20.
Environ Epidemiol ; 6(2): e185, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35434456

RESUMEN

Exposures at work have a major impact on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Current risk reduction policies and strategies are informed by existing scientific evidence, which is limited due to the challenges of studying the complex relationship between exposure at work and outside work and health. We define the working life exposome as all occupational and related nonoccupational exposures. The latter includes nonoccupational exposures that may be directly or indirectly influenced by or interact with the working life of the individual in their relation to health. The Exposome Project for Health and Occupational Research aims to advance knowledge on the complex working life exposures in relation to disease beyond the single high exposure-single health outcome paradigm, mapping and relating interrelated exposures to inherent biological pathways, key body functions, and health. This will be achieved by combining (1) large-scale harmonization and pooling of existing European cohorts systematically looking at multiple exposures and diseases, with (2) the collection of new high-resolution external and internal exposure data. Methods and tools to characterize the working life exposome will be developed and applied, including sensors, wearables, a harmonized job exposure matrix (EuroJEM), noninvasive biomonitoring, omics, data mining, and (bio)statistics. The toolbox of developed methods and knowledge will be made available to policy makers, occupational health practitioners, and scientists. Advanced knowledge on working life exposures in relation to NCDs will serve as a basis for evidence-based and cost-effective preventive policies and actions. The toolbox will also enable future scientists to further expand the working life exposome knowledge base.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...