An audit of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients attending our center at Bergamo, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly is a chronic disease impacting on morbidity and mortality. Increased mortality is reverted after the achievement of hormonal targets. The relative role of treatment options is still matter of debate. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all the acromegalic patients attending our center along the last 20 years. RESULTS: Data about 159 patients (83 F) were retrieved and analyzed: 18% had been lost to follow-up, while follow-up was >5 years in 79%. Growth hormone (GH) at diagnosis was 24 microg/L (median, range 3-239). Pituitary MRI showed a macro-, micro-adenoma or no lesion in 73.6, 22.9, and 3.5%, respectively. Hyperprolactinemia (hyperPRL) was present in 20.8%. Ninety-six and 29 patients had been treated by neurosurgery (NS) and irradiated (RT), respectively. Drugs had been employed in 149 patients (in 58 as the only treatment). At the last evaluation, 22% of patients were cured (hypopituitarism and GH deficiency in 6.3%), 37.1% were controlled by ongoing pharmacological treatment, 22.6% had discordant GH and Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) values, and 18.2% had still active disease (median follow-up in this last group was 9 months). By evaluating the outcome with a multimodal approach, safe GH and normal IGF-I had been achieved in 78 and 63.5% of the whole series, 80.5 and 59.7% in patients submitted to NS (and adjuvantly treated with drugs), 95.8 and 91.7% in those submitted to NS + RT (and drugs as well), 70.2 and 55.2% in those treated only with drugs (increased to 82.2 and 60.9% if considering only patients treated with modern long-acting drugs). Hypopituitarism had occurred in 25, 66.6, and 13.8% in the three groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, previous RT and NS were significant positive predictors of cure, whereas previous NS, follow-up, and year of diagnosis were significant positive predictors of control. Diabetes was a negative predictor both of cure and control. Sex, age, baseline GH levels, hyperPRL, tumor size, extrasellar extension, and invasiveness were not independent predictors of either cure or control. CONCLUSION: This series seems to indicate that a multimodal approach can achieve control of disease in most patients.

Primary treatment of acromegaly with octreotide LAR: a long-term (up to nine years) prospective study of its efficacy in the control of disease activity and tumor shrinkage.

CONTEXT: Neurosurgery is regarded as the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Because of its low cure rate in macro and invasive adenoma, the role of primary medical treatment is debated. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate primary pharmacological treatment in acromegaly. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted an open prospective study at two Italian tertiary level centers. PATIENTS: We studied 67 consecutive patients (36 women; age, 54.9 +/- 14.2 yr; 72% bearing macroadenoma). INTERVENTION: Individually tailored octreotide LAR (OCLAR) was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included safe GH (<2.5 mug/liter), normal age-matched IGF-I levels, and tumor shrinkage. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 6-108 months), safe GH levels and normal age-matched IGF-I values were obtained by 68.7 and 70.1% of patients, respectively. Hormonal endpoints were achieved regardless of basal levels, and early results were predictive of outcome. Tumor shrank in 82.1% of patients by 62 +/- 31% (range, 0-100%), decreasing from 2101 +/- 2912 to 1010 +/- 2196 mm(3) (P < 0.0001). The higher the basal GH values and the greater the GH/IGF-I changes on treatment, the greater the tumor shrinkage. Tumor disappeared in three patients and was progressively reduced to empty sella in five patients; apparent magnetic resonance imaging cavernous sinus invasion disappeared in three. In males, testosterone increased, restoring eugonadism in 64% of hypogonadal patients. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy on GH/IGF-I levels in unselected patients and the outstanding volumetric control indicate that treatment with OCLAR may be the first therapeutic approach to all acromegalic patients not amenable to surgical cure. Tumor shrinkage might also encourage the evaluation of primary OCLAR adoption in patients with initial visual field defects.

Four-year treatment with octreotide-long-acting repeatable in 110 acromegalic patients: predictive value of short-term results?

The effects of a very prolonged treatment with octreotide (OC)-long-acting repeatable (LAR) were retrospectively evaluated in 110 patients with acromegaly, showing a GH/IGF-I decrease of at least 20% vs. baseline after a short-term (6-month) OC-LAR challenge. OC-LAR was given (20 mg, im, every 28 d for 3 injections, then individually tailored) as adjuvant treatment (AT) in 59. The other 51 [primary treatment (PT)] were naive or previously treated by pharmacotherapy. IGF-I normalized in 83 patients [75%; from 770 +/- 26 (mean +/- SE) to 276 +/- 15 micro g/liter; P < 0.0001; median follow-up, 30 months; range, 18-54 months). A progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization was observed. GH fell to less than 2.5 micro g/liter in 72% and to less than 1 micro g/liter in 27% (from 20.7 +/- 2.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.2 micro g/liter; P < 0.0001). PT and AT patients achieved similar final GH/IGF-I levels and rates of normalization. Patients attaining safe GH and normal IGF-I had GH levels below 5 micro g/liter after 3 months and IGF-I levels below 550 micro g/liter after 6 months. No tachyphylaxis was observed. The up-titration to 30 mg improved IGF-I suppression. Elderly patients had greater sensitivity. Tumor shrank in 46% of assessable patients, in 77% of PT patients, and in 91% of naive patients. The powerful suppression of GH/IGF-I levels without tachyphylaxis, the finding of progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization and of superimposable effects in PT and AT patients, and the predictive value of short-term results support the role of PT of acromegaly with OC-LAR in at least some patients.